[HAIFUX Lecture] High performance multi threaded programming - Shachar Shemesh

2008-05-07 Thread Orr Dunkelman
Next Monday, 12th of May, at 18:30 the Haifa Linux Club, will gather to listen to Shachar Shemesh's talk about High performance multi threaded programming Abstract With a bit of manual reading, anyone can learn how to create a program that has more than one thread of execution. This brea

Re: Asterisk

2008-05-07 Thread Tzafrir Cohen
On Wed, May 07, 2008 at 11:32:54AM +0800, Ohad Levy wrote: > ilbc is the best "compression wize" but takes the most of the cpu. > > I can have up to four gsm channels on my linksys openwrt box :) iLBC has a not-exatly-free license, and has thus been remomved fromt he default distribution. Review

Re: RHEL-family dev environment

2008-05-07 Thread Gilboa Davara
On Wed, 2008-05-07 at 15:26 +0300, Ira Abramov wrote: > Quoting Gilboa Davara, from the post of Wed, 07 May: > > > > > > - Gilboa > > > [1] http://kde-redhat.sourceforge.net/ > > yup, that's the repo that supplies us with a really unstable kdevelop... Have you reported the problem in the kde-re

Re: RHEL-family dev environment

2008-05-07 Thread Gilboa Davara
On Wed, 2008-05-07 at 22:21 +1000, Amos Shapira wrote: > On Wed, May 7, 2008 at 5:28 PM, Gilboa Davara <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > P.S. as other have mentioned, if the machines are being used for > > development and testing, CentOS should be OK. > > If the machines are being used for product

Re: RHEL-family dev environment

2008-05-07 Thread Ira Abramov
Quoting Gilboa Davara, from the post of Wed, 07 May: > > > > - Gilboa > > [1] http://kde-redhat.sourceforge.net/ yup, that's the repo that supplies us with a really unstable kdevelop... > P.S. as other have mentioned, if the machines are being used for > development and testing, CentOS should be

Re: RHEL-family dev environment

2008-05-07 Thread Amos Shapira
On Wed, May 7, 2008 at 5:28 PM, Gilboa Davara <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > P.S. as other have mentioned, if the machines are being used for > development and testing, CentOS should be OK. > If the machines are being used for production (servers, machines that > will end up in your client's hand

Re: RHEL-family dev environment

2008-05-07 Thread Gilboa Davara
On Wed, 2008-05-07 at 10:25 +0300, Gilboa Davara wrote: > On Mon, 2008-05-05 at 16:40 +0300, Ira Abramov wrote: > > you may remember a few weeks ago, I was asking about KDE and kdevelop > > for centos5. I recommended against it, the client insisted, now we are > > seeing it's buggy as hell, the kd

Re: RHEL-family dev environment

2008-05-07 Thread Gilboa Davara
On Mon, 2008-05-05 at 16:40 +0300, Ira Abramov wrote: > you may remember a few weeks ago, I was asking about KDE and kdevelop > for centos5. I recommended against it, the client insisted, now we are > seeing it's buggy as hell, the kde4RHEL repositories give us binaries > newer than what Ubuntu of

Re: RHEL-family dev environment

2008-05-07 Thread Gilad Ben-Yossef
Ira Abramov wrote: Quoting Gilad Ben-Yossef, from the post of Tue, 06 May: Ira Abramov wrote: centos5. I recommended against it, the client insisted, now we are seeing it's buggy as hell I would say that claiming that CentOS5 is not a good development environment for a pro