--- Tom Rosenfeld <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Thanks Oded. That sounds like it should work. I was
> just hoping there was
> some way to override $arch on the command line.
> Actually I now vaguely recall some command that
> temporaroly changes the
> architecture in your environment. has anyone e
Ira Abramov wrote:
is the RHEL-supplied Xvnc ignoring MIT-MAGIC-COOKIE because of
configuration, or something missing at compile time?
I believe they ignore it because their X server doesn't support it.
A VNC server is also an X server, which means that you are NOT using a
X.org or XFree86 ba
On Feb 2, 2008 9:01 PM, Tom Rosenfeld <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I hear ZFS is available on Linux. Anyone has any experience with it there?
Last time I heard it was implemented as a FUSE module (User-level file
system), both because this is ideal for development and because its license
doesn't
On Feb 2, 2008 11:49 PM, Ira Abramov <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> howdie gang!
>
> I have two clients with a similar problem: the run a job dispatcher that
> sends their requests to a free node in a compute cluster to run a
> compilation or simulation of the system. Some of those jobs are supposed
howdie gang!
I have two clients with a similar problem: the run a job dispatcher that
sends their requests to a free node in a compute cluster to run a
compilation or simulation of the system. Some of those jobs are supposed
to open an interactive X connection. the display is set right but of
cour
I hear ZFS is available on Linux. Anyone has any experience with it there?
-tom
On Jan 22, 2008 3:28 PM, Jacob Broido <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I agree with Hetz, it really depends on the use scenario of the FS.
>
> On a side note, if its a viable platform(solaris), I'd consider seriously
> Z
Thanks Oded. That sounds like it should work. I was just hoping there was
some way to override $arch on the command line.
Actually I now vaguely recall some command that temporaroly changes the
architecture in your environment. has anyone else heard of it?
About nspluginwrapper. It is available in
[... Once upon a time I asked about Linux support of >2TB filesystems ...]
Okay, task is over and we have a 2.5TB ext3 filesystem (eventually not 6TB),
it looks stable also.
Here are the findings:
1. For >2TB, one must use a "gpt" type partition table and not the default,
msdos one. Same goes f
Hi,
I'm not Tal, but I think that using a different distro can help as it
operates using a different kernel (preferably a kernel from an enterprise
distro).
- Noam
On Feb 2, 2008 9:48 AM, Shlomi Fish <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Hi Tal!
>
> May you please answer my email?
>
> Regards,
>
>
