Hi,
>I suppose the existance of this patch means that this isn't possible
in the standard kernel.
You are right; it is not in the kernel , also not in the git unstable
tree . In fact , as you can see in that link, it is from January
2005; So I suppose it will not be integrated into the kernel in t
On 07/11/2007, Rami Rosen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> Amos,
> I do not know if this is possible to probe for an RLIMIT resoruces of
> a process; however, there is a patch of Bill Rugolsky which enables
> it; see:http://lwn.net/Articles/119703/
> this patch is against a single file: /proc
Quoting Michael Sternberg, from the post of Wed, 07 Nov:
>
> It looks that if we will use libintl as DLL - we're OK, as it stated here:
> http://www.gnu.org/software/gettext/manual/gettext.html#Discussions
>
> Am I right ?
Yes from what _we_ know. Of course your company's lawyer should be aware
o
Quoting Ori Idan, from the post of Wed, 07 Nov:
>
> If it is GPL, I am happy, this shows the greatness of GPL, it forces free
> software.
actually, that's a bad way of putting things and the wrong marketing
message to put up there.
GPL only works happily with other free software. if you want to
Hello,
I've been looking for a way to cause Apache to dump core when it crashes
(found it - point CoreDumpDirectory to a writeable directory) and while
doing so I was looking for a way to verify whether the "unlimit -c
unlimited" that I hoped I had passed to it is actually working, but couldn't
fi
Well, this is the greatness of GPL that it demands publishing your source
code.
--
Ori Idan
On Nov 7, 2007 9:36 AM, Michael Sternberg <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> I agree that GPL is great and know that GPL applications can be
> commercial. The problem is that it demands to publish your appl
