On 7/3/07, Gil Freund <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
On 7/3/07, Vassilii Khachaturov <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > Let me try explaining what is it that I find missing in Debian's
> > iptables setup:
> >
>
> If you have console access, it's a different thing. I agree that,
> perhaps, a mid or low pr
On 03/07/07, Micha Silver <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Oded Arbel wrote:
> On Tue, 2007-07-03 at 21:16 +1000, Amos Shapira wrote:
>
>
> I think this is really bad. The only good thing in the above document
> is that one of the tools suggested in the first section is shorewall
which is
> a brillia
On 7/3/07, Vassilii Khachaturov <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Let me try explaining what is it that I find missing in Debian's
> iptables setup:
>
If you have console access, it's a different thing. I agree that,
perhaps, a mid or low priority debconf option to change it to auto-save
every change
On 7/3/07, Shlomo Solomon <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
3 - There is obvoiusly still a problem here and I don't know if it's Bezeq or
015-Smile. I'm convinced the problem is not on my machine, since as I wrote
earlier, I have the same problem on my regular Mandriva partition and a
clean, non-update
> Let me try explaining what is it that I find missing in Debian's
> iptables setup:
>
> The most basic use case is for a sysadmin to configure rules and
> expect them to survive reboot. This is the behavior he is familiar
> with from nearly every enterprise FW device. Here, on Debian OTOH he's
>
On 7/3/07, Amos Shapira <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
On 03/07/07, shlomo solomon <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Sorry if this arrives twice, but my original message to
[EMAIL PROTECTED] didn't arrive after waiting an hour.
To the list managers - maybe an attachment to the end of messages is in
order
On Tuesday 03 July 2007 11:27, Yedidyah Bar-David wrote:
> On Tue, Jul 03, 2007 at 08:18:01AM +0200, shlomo solomon wrote:
> [snip]
>
> > I contacted 015 and after being instructed to telnet into one of their
> > servers and succeeding (telnet 192.114.186.54 110) they said they had no
> > idea what
Hi,
Thanks every one that answered me.
On 7/2/07, Vassilii Khachaturov <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Is it for a server room or an (home?) office location?
In that case, make sure you can live with the dB the UPS
will put up. And listen to it yourself --- lower dB at some
freqs sounds nastier than
On Tue, Jul 03, 2007, Amos Shapira wrote about "Re: Keeping iptables rules
across reboots on Debian (lenny) ?":
> Are you serious? You recommend people to edit a file with a syntax like:
Oh, and I forgot to mention the most important reason why I always - and in
this case as well - like to confi
On Tue, Jul 03, 2007, Amos Shapira wrote about "Re: Keeping iptables rules
across reboots on Debian (lenny) ?":
> >The approach I like better is to edit
> >
> >/etc/sysconfig/iptables
>..
> Are you serious? You recommend people to edit a file with a syntax like:
>...
Yes!
The "Generated
Oded Arbel wrote:
On Tue, 2007-07-03 at 21:16 +1000, Amos Shapira wrote:
I think this is really bad. The only good thing in the above document
is that one of the tools suggested in the first section is shorewall which is
a brilliant firewall management script and ever since I started worki
On Tue, 2007-07-03 at 21:16 +1000, Amos Shapira wrote:
> As a long-time debian advocate, I'm hanging my head in shame about
> this - the above behaviour is the single advantage I found with FC/RH
> over latest Debian. As far as I can tell, Debian Sarge used to have
> some provisions for saving/res
On Tue, 2007-07-03 at 21:24 +1000, Amos Shapira wrote:
> On 03/07/07, Nadav Har'El <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> The approach I like better is to edit /etc/sysconfig/iptables
> Are you serious? You recommend people to edit a file with a syntax
> like:
>
> # Generated by iptables-save v1
On 03/07/07, Nadav Har'El <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
On Tue, Jul 03, 2007, Oded Arbel wrote about "Re: Keeping iptables rules
across reboots on Debian (lenny) ?":
> *) The SysV script offers the option of "save" to call iptables-store
> for you. The standard sysadmin use case would be to setup t
On 03/07/07, Oded Arbel <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
*) The SysV script offers the option of "save" to call iptables-store
for you. The standard sysadmin use case would be to setup the needed
rules, then run '/etc/init.d/iptables save' and then reboot the machine
and the rules will be loaded autom
On Tue, Jul 03, 2007, Oded Arbel wrote about "Re: Keeping iptables rules across
reboots on Debian (lenny) ?":
> *) The SysV script offers the option of "save" to call iptables-store
> for you. The standard sysadmin use case would be to setup the needed
> rules, then run '/etc/init.d/iptables save'
On Tue, 2007-07-03 at 12:23 +0300, Maxim Veksler wrote:
> On 7/2/07, Baruch Even <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > * Maxim Veksler <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [070702 03:32]:
> > > On 7/2/07, Lior Kaplan <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > > >Maxim Veksler wrote:
> > > >
> > > >Use iptables-save to save your curre
On Tue, 2007-07-03 at 11:27 +0300, Yedidyah Bar-David wrote:
> On Tue, Jul 03, 2007 at 08:18:01AM +0200, shlomo solomon wrote:
> [snip]
> > I contacted 015 and after being instructed to telnet into one of their
> > servers and succeeding (telnet 192.114.186.54 110) they said they had no
> > idea wh
On 7/2/07, Baruch Even <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
* Maxim Veksler <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [070702 03:32]:
> On 7/2/07, Lior Kaplan <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> >Maxim Veksler wrote:
> >
> >Use iptables-save to save your current rules as to the iptables rules
> >files. It will be loaded on the next re
On Tue, Jul 03, 2007 at 08:18:01AM +0200, shlomo solomon wrote:
[snip]
> I contacted 015 and after being instructed to telnet into one of their
> servers and succeeding (telnet 192.114.186.54 110) they said they had no
> idea what to do (we don't support Linux). The only thing they suggested was
>
On 03/07/07, shlomo solomon <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Sorry if this arrives twice, but my original message to
[EMAIL PROTECTED] didn't arrive after waiting an hour.
Don't know about your problem but the linux.org.il alias was shut down a few
weeks ago and only mail to cs.huji.ac.il is accept
>From my personal experience, Bezeq is absolutely useless.
I've had regular conversations that go like this "Hi, is there a problem
with the ADSL in my area?" "No" "But I have this problem, I haven't
changed anything on my PC, and last time this happened, the problem was
on your side". After con
22 matches
Mail list logo
