--- shimi <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> Replying to myself because I found the CAUSE, but
> not the REASON.
>
> toast ~ # date
> Sun Apr 22 01:25:13 IDT 2007
> toast ~ # date
> Sun Apr 22 00:52:25 IDT 2007
> toast ~ # date
> Sun Apr 22 01:25:14 IDT 2007
> toast ~ # date
> Sun Apr 22 00:52:26 I
On 22/04/07, Gil Freund <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
On 4/22/07, Amos Shapira <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On 22/04/07, Gil Freund <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > True, however:
> > 1. Scalix is a free (as in beer), there is still HP/Samsung code in
it.
> > 2. Scalix has the least feature
>
> *le
On 4/22/07, Amos Shapira <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
On 22/04/07, Gil Freund <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> True, however:
> 1. Scalix is a free (as in beer), there is still HP/Samsung code in it.
> 2. Scalix has the least feature
*least* features? I haven't got around to test it myself but thei
On 22/04/07, Gil Freund <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
True, however:
1. Scalix is a free (as in beer), there is still HP/Samsung code in it.
2. Scalix has the least feature
*least* features? I haven't got around to test it myself but their web site
left me with the impression it aims (and ach
On 22/04/07, Gil Freund <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
On 4/21/07, Amos Shapira <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Hi,
>
> Our servers have to deal with huge amounts of small files (tens,
sometimes
> hundreds of thousands of files IN ONE DIRECTORY).
Do you access them locally or remotely, if so, how?
On 22/04/07, Marc A. Volovic <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Quoth Amos Shapira:
> Hi,
>
> Our servers have to deal with huge amounts of small files (tens,
> sometimes hundreds of thousands of files IN ONE DIRECTORY).
>
> Currently they use ext3 but I wonder wether this is the prefered FS.
Ext3 is
Replying to myself because I found the CAUSE, but not the REASON.
toast ~ # date
Sun Apr 22 01:25:13 IDT 2007
toast ~ # date
Sun Apr 22 00:52:25 IDT 2007
toast ~ # date
Sun Apr 22 01:25:14 IDT 2007
toast ~ # date
Sun Apr 22 00:52:26 IDT 2007
toast ~ # date
Sun Apr 22 01:25:15 IDT 2007
toast ~ # d
Hi,
WMV is a type of file, not a type of compression. You need both a WMV
player and a CODEC (enCODerdECoder) for the types of compression.
One codec for audio and one for video).
Actually, like AVI, it's a container which supports different codecs.
You can (theoritaclly speaking) wrap a Quick
On Saturday 21 April 2007 22:08, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I think that your problem is in the crontab time and day configuration.
> Can you send the relevant crontab time and date configuration.
>
> Yours,
>
> Yaron Kahanovitch
Hi Yaron,
Did you mean the scheduled jobs?
I have this
Hi,
I think that your problem is in the crontab time and day configuration.
Can you send the relevant crontab time and date configuration.
Yours,
Yaron Kahanovitch
- Original Message -
From: "shimi" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: "linux-il" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: 21:36:53 (GMT+0200) Asia
Hi All,
Sorry for being so verbose, but I was not really sure which of all those
details is important to understand the source of the problem :)
I've installed a new machine into production on Thursday (19 Apr 2007).
Machine is still running since then:
$ uptime
21:10:43 up 2 days, 10:11, 2 u
On Fri, Apr 20, 2007 at 06:07:05PM -0400, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> I am looking for wmv movie player.
> Are there any recommendations for such a player.
WMV is a type of file, not a type of compression. You need both a WMV
player and a CODEC (enCODerdECoder) for the types of compres
On 4/21/07, Amos Shapira <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Hi,
Our servers have to deal with huge amounts of small files (tens, sometimes
hundreds of thousands of files IN ONE DIRECTORY).
Do you access them locally or remotely, if so, how?
Currently they use ext3 but I wonder wether this is the pr
On 4/21/07, Marc A. Volovic <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Quoth Gil Freund:
> Sub 20 users licensing is expensive, and free/GPL version is not
> appropriate due to the outlook factor.
Scalix provides 25 outlook licenses in the community open edition...
True, however:
1. Scalix is a free (as in
Quoth Gil Freund:
> Sub 20 users licensing is expensive, and free/GPL version is not
> appropriate due to the outlook factor.
Scalix provides 25 outlook licenses in the community open edition...
--
---MAV
Marc A. Volovic [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Swiftouch, LTD
Quoth Amos Shapira:
> Hi,
>
> Our servers have to deal with huge amounts of small files (tens,
> sometimes hundreds of thousands of files IN ONE DIRECTORY).
>
> Currently they use ext3 but I wonder wether this is the prefered FS.
Ext3 is - last I chaecked (about two years ago) possibly the wors
Hi,
Is there a local ISP providing groupware (Zimbra, Scalix or
OpenXchange) hosting. This is for a small site (5-8) users.
Sub 20 users licensing is expensive, and free/GPL version is not
appropriate due to the outlook factor.
Thanks
Gil
--
Gil Freund, Systems Analyst
---
Hi,
Our servers have to deal with huge amounts of small files (tens, sometimes
hundreds of thousands of files IN ONE DIRECTORY).
Currently they use ext3 but I wonder wether this is the prefered FS.
I used to be fond of ReiserFS v3 until I got beaten by it not recovering
from a partition resizin
ביום שישי 20 אפריל 2007, 21:00, כתבת:
> Hello guys,
>
> What software would you recommend for project management under Linux?
> Currently I need to keep track of time spent on each project. It has to
> be web-based.
>
Look in the archives for a thread titled "Just another project management
ques
You can look at NetOffice, seems like a good option
netoffice.sourceforge.net
take a look at the list in the wikipedia
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_project_management_software
On Fri, April 20, 2007 21:00, Andre Bar'yudin wrote:
> Hello guys,
>
>
> What software would you recommend for p
20 matches
Mail list logo
