On Sun, Nov 26, 2006 at 08:42:39AM +0200, Michael Green wrote:
> On 11/23/06, Ilya Konstantinov <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> >On 11/23/06, Michael Green <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> >> I'm trying to build old gcc-2.95.* on AMD x64 with RHEL4.
> >
> >Does such an old version of gcc even support x86-
Silly suggestion: why not just install binary gcc-2.95
for i386 with all needed 32-bit libraries ?
Valery.
--- Michael Green <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On 11/23/06, Ilya Konstantinov <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> wrote:
> > On 11/23/06, Michael Green <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> wrote:
> > > I'm trying to b
On 11/23/06, Ilya Konstantinov <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
On 11/23/06, Michael Green <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I'm trying to build old gcc-2.95.* on AMD x64 with RHEL4.
Does such an old version of gcc even support x86-64 (as a target for
the code it compiles, not as a target to run on)?
Do
Thanks.
It doesn't seem to be the nVidia driver, as rmmodding it doesn't drop
the SI count too much. I'm using 1.0.8776.
As for my eth card, its a 8139 chipset (Realtek Semiconductor Co.,
Ltd. RTL-8139/8139C/8139C+ (rev 10)). I'm using the default
Debian-testing module (8139cp).
My RX|TX is:
RX
Peter wrote:
> Really ? Let's see. The people who duplicated the ink 'protection'
> chips on Lexmark ink cartridges did not duplicate the chips proper,
> they duplicated the protocol. In other words they gained access to the
> 'file format' (or 'wire format' in this case). They were sued by
> Lexm
