Hello folks!
Can someone supply an RTFM describing the kernel implementation of this
API (other than reading the source code).
In particular, is it interrupt driven (as I always thought) or does it
use some sort of polling method?
Thanks,
Daniel
begin:vcard
fn:Daniel Feiglin
n:Feiglin;Dani
Hi Shachar,
Both Spamhaus and SORBS are *not* listing IP's on the basis of bounces,
only on the basis of actual spam received, which happens occasionally,
despite the generally good policing efforts that gmail and yahoo do.
BTW, Baruch Siach also configured our main server (sendmail) not to rel
Jonathan Ben Avraham wrote:
> Hi Shachar,
> Spamhaus and SORBS routinely list yahoo, google, hotmail, tiscali and
> other freemail addresses. So the problem isn't just SpamCop.
The main question is WHY they are being blocked.
Spamcop has been leading a crusade to make bouncing of incoming messages
Hi Shachar,
Spamhaus and SORBS routinely list yahoo, google, hotmail, tiscali and
other freemail addresses. So the problem isn't just SpamCop.
Secondly, talking with ISP's is a waste of time, unless there is a
designated community representative who speaks with a designated
management represe
On 26/01/02, guy keren <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
i think you forgot to add "and the reason i'm involved in such suspicious
activities is that i need bla bla bla (put a convincing description of a
legitimate need to run such password crackers here...)
And how would that matter? If he gives the
ביום שני, 12 ביוני 2006, 17:43, נכתב על ידי Shachar Shemesh:
> The solution is very simple. DO NOT USE SPAMCOP'S RBL
>
> Talk to your ISP and let them know that they are using a broken spam
> reporting tool.
Aharon, if you do call them, please record that message, we can have a lough
at the n
man e2label
On 6/12/06, Ira Abramov <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Quoting Dan Shimshoni, from the post of Mon, 12 Jun:
> in /etc/fstab, I have:
> LABEL=/work1/work1 ext3defaults1 2
>
> When I installed FC4 , I had chosen manual partition, and selected /work1
Aharon Schkolnik wrote:
> Technical details of temporary failure:
> TEMP_FAILURE: SMTP Error (state 9): 530 5.7.1 Blocked - see
> http://www.spamcop.net/bl.shtml?66.249.92.168: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>
At least in the past, spamcop used to add to their RBL any host that had
the audacity of bouncing
Hi.
I just noticed the following in my gmail mailbox:
Mail Delivery Subsystem
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> to aschkolnik+caf.
More options 4:25 pm (57 minutes ago)
This is an automatically generated Delivery Status Notification
THIS IS A WARNING MESSAGE ONLY.
YOU DO NOT NEED TO RES
Hi.
I just noticed the following in my gmail mailbox:
This is an automatically generated Delivery Status Notification
Delivery to the following recipient failed permanently:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Technical details of permanent failure:
PERM_FAILURE: SMTP Error (state 9): 550 IP 66.249.92.169
Hi.
I have my gmail account set to forward my email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
As far as i can tell, gmail has been unable to forward mail to that address
for the last hour. Also, I have sent email from gmail to that address, and
have not received it. However, Barak support sucessfully sent me mail,
Hello,
Yes, you are rigth, it did work ! thnks!
DanOn 6/12/06, Ira Abramov <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Quoting Dan Shimshoni, from the post of Mon, 12 Jun:> in /etc/fstab, I have:>
LABEL=/work1/work1 ext3defaults1
2>> When I installed FC4 , I had chosen manu
Dan Shimshoni wrote:
>
> in /etc/fstab, I have:
> LABEL=/work1/work1 ext3defaults1 2
>
> When I installed FC4 , I had chosen manual partition, and selected /work1
> as a mounting point for /dev/hda3; I have more partitions on this disk.
> (one of them is f
Quoting Dan Shimshoni, from the post of Mon, 12 Jun:
> in /etc/fstab, I have:
> LABEL=/work1/work1 ext3defaults1 2
>
> When I installed FC4 , I had chosen manual partition, and selected /work1
> as a mounting point for /dev/hda3; I have more partitions on t
in /etc/fstab, I have:
LABEL=/work1
/work1
ext3
defaults 1 2
When I installed FC4 , I had chosen manual partition, and selected /work1
as a mounting point for /dev/hda3; I have more partitions on this disk.
(one of them is for the other OS).
Is there a **saf
On Mon, Jun 12, 2006 at 12:45:37PM +0300, Ancient1 wrote:
> If I may intrude , I'd like to point out that you may be confusing
> Motherboard design with sound sampling . the FlyVideo is a PCI card and
> PCI defaults to 33Mhz and of course PCI card. If you are not mistaken
> but its me , than up
ציטוט Geoffrey S. Mendelson:
On Mon, Jun 12, 2006 at 01:35:27AM +0300, Oded Arbel wrote:
I don't believe the OSS emulation is ALSA is using 32KHz. I'm not sure
if its a fixed rate, but on my computer it seems to be using 48KHz
(which makes much more sense - sound cards work with either 44.1K
On Mon, 2006-06-12 at 10:47 +0300, Nadav Har'El wrote:
> On Mon, Jun 12, 2006, Oded Arbel wrote about "Re: Upgrading live RH9":
> > As mentioned before- upgrading RedHat/Fedora is not a recommended
> > practice
>
> I'm not sure anyone said that. Upgrading Fedora is not only recommended
> practice,
On Mon, Jun 12, 2006, Oded Arbel wrote about "Re: Upgrading live RH9":
> As mentioned before- upgrading RedHat/Fedora is not a recommended
> practice
I'm not sure anyone said that. Upgrading Fedora is not only recommended
practice, it is the only sensible practice: I've been using Redhat since
Red
19 matches
Mail list logo
