Re: [EMAIL PROTECTED]: Re: problem with usb2.0 usbkey with kernel 2.6.8]

2006-05-07 Thread Avraham Rosenberg
On Sun, May 07, 2006 at 12:10:18PM +0300, guy keren wrote: > > just out of curiousity - most USB disk-on-key devices i saw had a > partition on them that was supposed to be mounted (i.e. you'd need to > mount /dev/sdb1 or /dev/sdb3, rather then /dev/sdb). > > did you verify that you indeed should

Re: [EMAIL PROTECTED]: Re: problem with usb2.0 usbkey with kernel 2.6.8]

2006-05-07 Thread Avraham Rosenberg
On Sun, May 07, 2006 at 01:46:19PM +0300, Ilya Konstantinov wrote: > Avraham Rosenberg wrote: > > >On Sun, Apr 30, 2006 at 11:45:14PM +0300, Chaim Keren Tzion wrote: > > > >>This sound very much like a problem I had/have. Does the dmesg show > >>anything like this "[CUMANA/ADFS]" after connecti

Re: voip and firewall

2006-05-07 Thread Erez D
On 5/7/06, Tzafrir Cohen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: On Sun, May 07, 2006 at 02:12:46PM +0300, Erez D wrote:> hi>> my company just installed a new firewall.> i had an ATA (grandstream handytone) that was connected via the internet to> asterisk at my home. >> this ATA does not work anymore ( i can di

voip and firewall

2006-05-07 Thread Erez D
himy company just installed a new firewall.i had an ATA (grandstream handytone) that was connected via the internet to asterisk at my homethis ATA does not work anymore ( i can dial, but have no incoming audio, people can dial to me but it disconnects when i answer) this is due to the new firewall.

Re: [EMAIL PROTECTED]: Re: problem with usb2.0 usbkey with kernel 2.6.8]

2006-05-07 Thread Ilya Konstantinov
Avraham Rosenberg wrote: On Sun, Apr 30, 2006 at 11:45:14PM +0300, Chaim Keren Tzion wrote: This sound very much like a problem I had/have. Does the dmesg show anything like this "[CUMANA/ADFS]" after connecting the disk-on-key? Well, search the web then! Your disk-on-key's p

Re: [EMAIL PROTECTED]: Re: problem with usb2.0 usbkey with kernel 2.6.8]

2006-05-07 Thread guy keren
just out of curiousity - most USB disk-on-key devices i saw had a partition on them that was supposed to be mounted (i.e. you'd need to mount /dev/sdb1 or /dev/sdb3, rather then /dev/sdb). did you verify that you indeed should mount the entire device? doesn't fdisk recognize partitions on this de