Nadav Har'El wrote:
what's really wrong
with that? How is that any different than what happens in any other utility
like phone, cellphone, electricity, water, and so on?
I think the great thing about the internet is specifically that we're
*not* billed for volume. That's separates the
On Thursday 20 April 2006 20:37, Ilya Konstantinov wrote:
> Ariel,
>
>
> Knowing that you're quite a veteran in this field, I'm feeling you must
> have inner knowledge which leads you to conclude that ISPs and TV
> companies have the noble goal of providing customers with the best value
> for their
On Tuesday, 18 בApril 2006 15:45, Shlomo Solomon wrote:
> When I click a link, while in Konqueror, I often
> (not always) get a notification that the HTML document will be opened
> in Firefox.
> I would expect
> that if I'm ALREADY in Konqueror, links would be opened in Konqueror.
You might wan
Ariel,
Knowing that you're quite a veteran in this field, I'm feeling you must
have inner knowledge which leads you to conclude that ISPs and TV
companies have the noble goal of providing customers with the best value
for their money, rather than maximizing shareholders value.
Is this so?
On Thursday 20 April 2006 19:22, Tzahi Fadida wrote:
> The bandwidth capabilities from israel won't be depleted 20 years from now
> (med). They have the capability they just want to earn more on you.
Yet, that bandwidth is not available to the ISPs, they have to buy the links,
and Med Nautilus nee
We'd better start using tags :)
\begin{joke}
Or I should get a better "sensor" of humor :)
Regards,
tzahi.
> -Original Message-
> From: Geoffrey S. Mendelson [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Sent: Thursday, April 20, 2006 5:27 PM
> To: Tzahi Fadida
> Cc: 'Israel Linux Mailing list'
>
Followup:
Also don't expect them to sell you the service unless you're already a
subscriber to BezeqInt's Internet service at 1.5M or higher. Hey, I
tried subscribing, talked to two different salesmen of theirs -- What's
the deal?! The service isn't free (in fact, you'd be paying good money
f
On Thu, Apr 20, 2006 at 06:22:50PM +0200, Tzahi Fadida wrote:
> I am sorry, but I don't agree with your logic.
It was a joke. Of course, it's flawed logic. :-)
Geoff.
--
Geoffrey S. Mendelson, Jerusalem, Israel [EMAIL PROTECTED] N3OWJ/4X1GM
IL Voice: (07)-7424-1667 IL Fax: 972-2-648-1443 U.S.
I am sorry, but I don't agree with your logic.
If there will be less usage the companies will buy less bandwidth
and earn more. You are not expected to get a better service.
Their logic will be, if you tolerate and pay for your service now
you will continue to do so later when they'll cut the bandw
On Thu, Apr 20, 2006, Hetz Ben Hamo wrote about "Looking for another ISP (a bit
off topic)":
> Hi,
> I just saw the news in
> ynet:http://www.ynet.co.il/articles/0,7340,L-3241600,00.html - Netvisionhas
> started charging extra for users who downloaded over 5GB a month.
> Naturally, since I'm tes
I called Netvision and asked them about the Y-Net article. I spoke to
someone who did not speak English well, but her English was better
than my Hebrew.
I have a 5m/256k connection via HOT. I am not limited to the amount of
downloads I make, nor will I be "fined" for extra useage.
This topic was
On Thu, Apr 20, 2006 at 04:54:41PM +0300, Avraham Rosenberg wrote:
> On Thu, Apr 20, 2006 at 03:34:08PM +0200, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> >
> > Hello,
> >
> >Have you read the latest DWN? It could be that you can jump right to the
> > 21st century, leaving 32 bit behind.
> >
> Hi,
> Ta
On Thursday 20 April 2006 15:20, Omer Zak wrote:
> The recent news about multiple security vulnerabilities in Firefox 1.5,
> and the lack of information about the Mozilla browser (the fatter older
> brother of Firefox) lead me to ask what is the corresponding information
> about Mozilla.
>
Well, I
On Thu, Apr 20, 2006 at 03:34:08PM +0200, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
>
> Hello,
>
>Have you read the latest DWN? It could be that you can jump right to the
> 21st century, leaving 32 bit behind.
>
Hi,
Tanks for the tip. I would read it NOW if only I knew what DWN
means, and where it is a
On Thu, Apr 20, 2006 at 03:20:40PM +0300, Omer Zak wrote:
> The recent news about multiple security vulnerabilities in Firefox 1.5,
> and the lack of information about the Mozilla browser (the fatter older
> brother of Firefox) lead me to ask what is the corresponding information
> about Mozilla.
>
On Thu, 2006-04-20 at 12:08 +0300, Hetz Ben Hamo wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I just saw the news in ynet:
> http://www.ynet.co.il/articles/0,7340,L-3241600,00.html - Netvision
> has started charging extra for users who downloaded over 5GB a month.
>
> Naturally, since I'm testing every now and then a new ve
The recent news about multiple security vulnerabilities in Firefox 1.5,
and the lack of information about the Mozilla browser (the fatter older
brother of Firefox) lead me to ask what is the corresponding information
about Mozilla.
Should I now ditch Mozilla in favor of Firefox 1.5.0.2 (which has
Hi,
I just saw the news in ynet:
http://www.ynet.co.il/articles/0,7340,L-3241600,00.html - Netvision
has started charging extra for users who downloaded over 5GB a month.
Naturally, since I'm testing every now and then a new version of
various Linux distributions, plus some other heavy bandwidth
18 matches
Mail list logo
