On Mon, 27 Feb 2006, Ilya Konstantinov wrote:
> Dogtail is another testing tool, based on Python:
>
> http://people.redhat.com/zcerza/dogtail/
>
>
> It's a rather new tool which was introduced in the GNOME circles last
> year so it might be worth checking out.
finally! xrunner is toast ;)
(also
Dogtail is another testing tool, based on Python:
http://people.redhat.com/zcerza/dogtail/
It's a rather new tool which was introduced in the GNOME circles last
year so it might be worth checking out.
Shlomi Fish wrote:
We are trying to set up qa for Denemo (denemo.sourceforge.net)
Yup, forgot the name! ISC it is :)
Thanks,
Hetz
On 2/27/06, Yaron Zabary <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> TAU runs with two ISC version 3.0.2 on Linux RH3. Over 10,000 hosts,
> most of them are assigned static addresses, but we also have a small
> number of dynamic hosts. Works with no problems. C
TAU runs with two ISC version 3.0.2 on Linux RH3. Over 10,000 hosts,
most of them are assigned static addresses, but we also have a small
number of dynamic hosts. Works with no problems. Configuration of failover
was not complicated, although you need to specify the failover peer for
each pool o
Be careful.
I had my share doing this tricks, and from my experience, NT's/2K/2003
DHCP server implementation simply sucks, specially when it comes to
Linux machines receving IP's from NT machines.
My suggestion: Install any other DHCP server on your Windows machines
that works well with Linux.
Howdy All,We are looking into implementing a redundant DHCP system in our office. Our main office uses NT servers with Split Scope. I'd like to implement a linux failover DHCP system, using ISC's failover configuration. Does anyone have any experience with failover DHCP? We would test, of cours
