On Wed, 8 Feb 2006, Gilad Ben-Yossef wrote:
> guy keren wrote:
>
> > if anyone is using sys V message queues, they should scrap them ;)
>
> With this notion i tend to agree. The problem is that while Linux (2.6+)
> does implement POSIX message queues which are oh so better, their
> implmentation
guy keren wrote:
if anyone is using sys V message queues, they should scrap them ;)
With this notion i tend to agree. The problem is that while Linux (2.6+)
does implement POSIX message queues which are oh so better, their
implmentation is so un documented that it ain't even funny.
I had
On Wed, 8 Feb 2006, Gilad Ben-Yossef wrote:
> [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> > Hi there,
> >
> > Having a message queue designed so that each queue (message type) is
> > assigned
> > to one process for reading. How do you handle a situation where the reading
> > process of a given queue doesn't func
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hi there,
Having a message queue designed so that each queue (message type) is assigned
to one process for reading. How do you handle a situation where the reading
process of a given queue doesn't function and messages still arrive to that
queue?
1. Will the queue fi
>
> I have configure 2 network card (100m full duplex each) in a bound.
>
> but when I check the speed of the virtual network card (boun0) I see that
> it is 10m
>
> how do is configure the virtual card to work 100m ?
>
> p.s.
> the system running Redhat AS 3.0 R5
How do you know t
On Tue, Feb 07, 2006 at 11:24:03PM +0200, Diego Iastrubni wrote:
> ביום שלישי, 7 בפברואר 2006, 12:17, נכתב על ידי Geoffrey S. Mendelson:
> > As for asterisk being "great" what is the alternative?
Disclaimer: I haven't actually tried any of those:
> Regarding the alternatives, you have some dudz w
There were so few details about the specific situation that anyone who
would answer you - would have to answer using general principles.
On Wed, 2006-02-08 at 02:07 -0600, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> Hi there,
>
> Having a message queue designed so that each queue (message type) is assigned
> to
Hi there,
Having a message queue designed so that each queue (message type) is assigned
to one process for reading. How do you handle a situation where the reading
process of a given queue doesn't function and messages still arrive to that
queue?
1. Will the queue fill up untill blocking the en
