On Tuesday 19 October 2004 23:45, Yedidyah Bar-David wrote:
> I do not want to make this look as some stupid contest, and intended not
> to reply, hoping for the thread to die.
My fault. I transformed it into a "contest" because it started
with a naive question by a newbie about shell redirection/
I encountered the following incompatibility problem.
I developed some Python scripts, which access a MySQL database using the
MySQLdb module.
The environment was RedHat 8.0, and the MySQLdb RPM version was 0.9.1-4.
Now, I am trying to run the same scripts in Debian Sarge environment,
and the MyS
Hi all,
I do not want to make this look as some stupid contest, and intended not
to reply, hoping for the thread to die. But I feel the current state of
it can leave some people with misconceptions.
On Tue, Oct 19, 2004 at 08:40:53PM +0200, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> Oron Peled wrote:
> >On Tuesd
Oron Peled wrote:
On Tuesday 19 October 2004 09:33, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Yedidyah Bar-David wrote:
That's wrong. If /tmp/tmp-sms contains multiple lines then sendsms
would be invoked separatly for each one of them.
You are right - multiple lines will result in multiple command line
arguments,
ביום שלישי, 19 באוקטובר 2004, 02:34, כתבת:
> An included javascript file for the main page starts with:
>
> var xmlDoc = new ActiveXObject("Msxml2.DOMDocument");
>
> and if it fails it has an alert saying that an accompanaying file was
> not loaded.
stupid ass holes who dont know how to code Java
On Tuesday 19 October 2004 01:59, Stiven Andre wrote:
> Hi list.
> Anyone knows why http://focus.msn.co.il/ doesn't work in any Linux
> browser?
Let's start with the obvious:
http://validator.w3.org/check?uri=http%3A%2F%2Ffocus.msn.co.il%2F
That would give you a start as you talk with focus peop
On Tuesday 19 October 2004 09:33, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> Yedidyah Bar-David wrote:
> >>That's wrong. If /tmp/tmp-sms contains multiple lines then sendsms
> >>would be invoked separatly for each one of them.
> You are right - multiple lines will result in multiple command line
> arguments, not
Quoting Oleg Goldshmidt <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
>
> ff:ff:ff:ff:ff:ff is 255.255.255.255 - the broadcast address
>
> 00:0f:34:7b:c8:a0 is the MAC of the offending host
>
> 08:06 is the protocol - ARP, if memory serves.
>
..
>Is the MAC above on your LAN?
Not to my knowledge. There are only two machi
Herouth Maoz <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> Oct 18 20:12:01 Motti kernel: martian source 172.27.107.135 from 172.27.96.1, on
> dev eth1
> Oct 18 20:12:01 Motti kernel: ll header:
> ff:ff:ff:ff:ff:ff:00:0f:34:7b:c8:a0:08:06
Basically, "martians" are "packets with source addresses with no known
rou
I asked this question on Whatsup and there was no help, I hope someone here can
clue me in, given that I'm not exactly an expert network manager...
I've switched from ADSL to cable yesterday, and although the network seems to
work, I constantly get martian messages in the kernel log, which probabl
Yedidyah Bar-David wrote:
On Tue, Oct 19, 2004 at 06:21:47AM +0200, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
That's wrong. If /tmp/tmp-sms contains multiple lines then sendsms
would be invoked separatly for each one of them.
Where did you get this from?
xargs(1):
" --max-chars=max-chars, -s max-chars
On Tue, Oct 19, 2004 at 06:21:47AM +0200, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> That's wrong. If /tmp/tmp-sms contains multiple lines then sendsms
> would be invoked separatly for each one of them.
Where did you get this from?
xargs(1):
" --max-chars=max-chars, -s max-chars
Use at most max-chars chara
12 matches
Mail list logo
