Meir Kriheli wrote:
If not seen it already, here's a nice tutorial about the subject:
http://www.linuxjournal.com/article.php?sid=6586
Thanks, the tutorial and links from it were very useful.
I wonder why I wasn't successful in locating the stuff by means of google.
From: guy keren <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
CC: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: Which RH or FC to install for company developer desktop?
Date: Sat, 3 Apr 2004 12:02:31 +0200 (IST)
(i'm responding only because i didn't see the more qualified people
respond to this yet)
since the mach
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
[snip]
No we don't have VMware. What do I need several linux environments for?
Anyway - shouldn't I be able to load several "sub-linux" under User-mode
Linux?
It's just that VMware images are very portable and allow for rollbacks.
It's just a convenience.
[snip]
Exchange
On Thu, Apr 01, 2004 at 11:33:15AM +0200, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I got a chance to install Linux on my office desktop (next to Windows
> XP, for now).
> I'd like to install something which will impress them the most with
> stability and usability, and mostly as a developer station.
>
On Friday 02 April 2004 17:49, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> The client is OpenBSD3.4 (and that's the command).
> Yes, I DO KNOW, this is a Linux list.
But that's Ok -- *BSD is family :-)
> Now, that's what I get by running "rpcinfo -p" to the
> server ip ("10.0.0.8") and to the client ip ("10.20
Gil Freund wrote:
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hi,
I got a chance to install Linux on my office desktop (next to Windows
XP, for now).
Do you have VMware? This can be very handy to display several Linux
environments side by side.
No we don't have VMware. What do I need several linux environments fo
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hi,
I got a chance to install Linux on my office desktop (next to Windows
XP, for now).
Do you have VMware? This can be very handy to display several Linux
environments side by side.
I'd like to install something which will impress them the most with
stability and usabi
guy keren wrote:
(i'm responding only because i didn't see the more qualified people
respond to this yet)
Thanks. Anyone's experience counts.
from stability point of view, you should install RH 9.0 - but it's a "dead
goat" because of redhat's recent moves.
Yes, I learned this by now. But right no