On Wed, Dec 17, 2003 at 02:23:45AM +0200, guy keren wrote:
> you will need to set the 'LD_ASSUME_KERNEL' variable very early during
> system boot - that will make _most_ processes launched with the non-tls
> libraries. however, the 'init' process, is launched before any of the
> system's initializ
On linux mailing lists you would have a much better chance of getting a
reply if you avoid the html mail (don't know about the policy on this
list but on most lists its considered offensive).
Most (all?) text mail agents don't handle html mails natively and even
when I used graphical ones I disable
maybe mozilla is not compiled with cups support in fedora/debian?
> When I run, mozilla 1.4.0 or 1.4.1 on Fedora-core1 or
> Knoppix 3.3 with added Debian applications partitions,
> all I can see in the mozilla printer selection window, is:
> "PostScript/default" ,
> and the printers output only En
On Tue, 16 Dec 2003, Elad Almadoi wrote:
> Hey!
> I have an IBM xSeries 335 runing redhat 7.3
> Till few a days ago all was runing as it cant get better
> Looks like from it self, a problem started:
> The machine have many IP's, the main one is configured as eth0 and the
> others as eth0:0 eth0:1
On Tue, 16 Dec 2003, Alon Weinstein wrote:
> Muli Ben-Yehuda wrote:
> > On Tue, Dec 16, 2003 at 09:21:27AM +0200, Alon Weinstein wrote:
> >
> >
> > cat /etc/ld.so.conf, assuming it hasn't been changed since the last
> > time someone ran ldconfig.
>
>
> Looking at /etc/ld.so.conf:
> /usr/kerberos/
Sorry for mailing this mail in HTML!
When I am running Mozilla 1.3.1 or 1.4.0 on my Mandrake-9.2 or RH
9-Enterprise WS Partitions,
I can print Hebrew pages on any one of my CUPS configured printers,
selected from the Mozilla printer selection window:
LocalHP930C@:33 [HP930C connected to parall
On Tue, 16 Dec 2003, Oleg Goldshmidt wrote:
> guy keren <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>
> > that's not what he was writing. he said that the benchmark should be
> > perfrmed on one of those systems. he didn't say these systems contained
> > the NPTL code from CVS head. get yourself one of those sys
On Tue, 16 Dec 2003 [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> guy keren wrote:
>
> > did you _read_ the mentioned post(s)? they give you a direction regarding
> > what to try doing.
> >
> > try running the problematic program using:
> >
> > LD_ASSUME_KERNEL=2.4.1
> >
> > read the posts for the exact command -
Lior Kaplan wrote:
Maybe http://subversion.tigris.org/ ?
Looks really nice, but is a source code management system (in general)
as a document management system? Considering that many documents (MS
Office files, PDF and Images) are in binary format, wouldn't that create
an unnecessary load in di
On Tue, Dec 16, 2003, Pinchas Rosenfeld wrote about "Printing hebrew with mozilla":
Please do not send HTML mail to mailing lists.
--
Nadav Har'El| Tuesday, Dec 16 2003, 22 Kislev 5764
[EMAIL PROTECTED] |-
Phone: +97
When I am running Mozilla
1.3.1 or 1.4.0 on my Mandrake-9.2 or RH 9-Enterprise WS
Partitions, I can print
Hebrew pages on any one of my CUPS configured printers,
selected from the Mozilla
printer selection window:
LocalHP930C@:33 [HP930C
connected to parallel port 0]
SMB-Printer@:33
[HP9
Maybe http://subversion.tigris.org/ ?
I'm not sure it answers all you requests.
You may also want to check this: http://horde.org/chora/
Regards,
Lior Kaplan
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://www.Guides.co.il
Come to write at the forums: http://www.guides.co.il/forums
- Original Message -
From
Yishay Mor wrote:
wow. not that I have any ideas (other than CVS), but just out of
curiosity, what is this for?
CVS would be nice if I could get people to use normal editors with
normal formats (read *ML)
Mainly for myself, and some startups I work with.
If you don't find anything existing, I
On Tue, Dec 16, 2003, Shaul Karl wrote about "Re: Various performance problems":
> On Tue, Dec 16, 2003 at 11:42:49AM +0200, Nadav Har'El wrote:
> >
> > I'm guessing that TLS (thread local storage, NOT transport layer
> > security)
>
>
> Is there any work to remove this name clash?
Yes,
On Tue, Dec 16, 2003 at 11:42:49AM +0200, Nadav Har'El wrote:
>
> I'm guessing that TLS (thread local storage, NOT transport layer
> security)
Is there any work to remove this name clash?
--
"If you have an apple and I have an apple and we exchange apples then
you and I will still ea
On Tue, Dec 16, 2003 at 05:08:36PM +0200, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
>
> It might be related to my switch to 2.6test11 (which I did about a month
> ago, when test9 or so came out), as it ("persist + maxfail 0") worked
> for me for months with 2.4.2x before that, or maybe it's just that
> Actcom are
guy keren <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> that's not what he was writing. he said that the benchmark should be
> perfrmed on one of those systems. he didn't say these systems contained
> the NPTL code from CVS head. get yourself one of those systems, and
> test.
Sorry, misattributed. Linus did test
"moses" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> Hi all
>
> The man page doesn't *really* say what it's .Does anyone know what is the exact
> meaning of this field - it's hard to belive that rss is the the number if current
> memory resident in 1024 bytes. I run several examples that show it
> the man page
guy keren wrote:
did you _read_ the mentioned post(s)? they give you a direction regarding
what to try doing.
try running the problematic program using:
LD_ASSUME_KERNEL=2.4.1
read the posts for the exact command - i might be typing it wrong here,
and i have no RH9 to test it on.
I think the m
On Tue, 16 Dec 2003, moses wrote:
> Hi all
>
> The man page doesn't *really* say what it's .Does anyone know what is the
> exact meaning of this field - it's hard to belive that rss is the the number
> if current memory resident in 1024 bytes. I run several examples that show
> it
>
> the man page
On Tue, 16 Dec 2003, Aaron wrote:
> I in fact noticed in RH 9.0 hspell and aspell were locking up my system.
> I was running a lowlatency kernel but found that jack and ardour were
> slow.
>
> I am now running Fedora, in kde and gnome window minimize slowly and
> maximize slowly. Programs lockup
On 16 Dec 2003, Oleg Goldshmidt wrote:
> Oleg Goldshmidt <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>
> > http://kerneltrap.org/comment/reply/1574
> >
> > Note that Ulrich Drepper says there that Fedora Core 1 and RHEL3
> > should not have the problem. Shachar says that RHAS3 is slow -
> > question is, whether
On 16 Dec 2003, Oleg Goldshmidt wrote:
> guy keren <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>
> > people have such short memories:
> >
> > http://www.mail-archive.com/[EMAIL PROTECTED]/msg30749.html
>
> From memory (thanks for reminding, Guy), someone (Mulix?) found this
> (I just found it on my own, but it d
Shaul Karl wrote:
> I am not using pptp. My point is that with pppoe, persist + maxfail 0
> parameters to pppd were suggested here in the past. Works well for me.
I am the one who suggested it, and it seems to work very well for
me too.
But recently (over the last week) I noticed twice that my ADSL
Hey!
I have an IBM xSeries 335 runing redhat
7.3
Till few a days ago all was runing as it cant get
better
Looks like from it self, a problem
started:
The machine have many IP's, the main one is
configured as eth0 and the others as eth0:0 eth0:1 eth0:2, etc...
All the eth0:* won't reply to p
On Tue, Dec 16, 2003 at 11:43:53AM +0200, Noam Rathaus wrote:
> I have implemented the following Crontab record to monitor my ADSL, and bring it up
> when it comes done:
>
> Does anyone have a better solution?
>
I am not using pptp. My point is that with pppoe, persist + maxfail 0
parameters
Perhaps you can try
http://www.linuxtested.com/linux_tools.html
-EK
- Original Message -
From: "Oleg Goldshmidt" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Tuesday, December 16, 2003 1:26 PM
Subject: Re: Various performance problems
> Oleg Goldshmidt <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes
Oleg Goldshmidt <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> http://kerneltrap.org/comment/reply/1574
>
> Note that Ulrich Drepper says there that Fedora Core 1 and RHEL3
> should not have the problem. Shachar says that RHAS3 is slow -
> question is, whether or not that is the same kernel as RHEL3 uses, and
> w
guy keren <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> people have such short memories:
>
> http://www.mail-archive.com/[EMAIL PROTECTED]/msg30749.html
>From memory (thanks for reminding, Guy), someone (Mulix?) found this
(I just found it on my own, but it does ring a bell)
http://kerneltrap.org/comment/reply
On Tue, Dec 16, 2003 at 11:43:53AM +0200, Noam Rathaus wrote:
> Does anyone have a better solution?
reasonable distros provide a directory of scripts or at least a script
that gets called whenever a ppp connection goes up or
down. /etc/ppp/ip-{up|down} and friends. See for example
http://www.hage
Hello,
I'm taking another approach: I have a process running, which makes sure
the connection is up every minute. The advantage is that if I don't want
ADSL connection for a while, I can kill a process, not crond.
This script has terrible bash syntax, but it has proven to work well for
over a
Well, here is a little script I use for adsl monitoring.
#!/bin/bash
ping -c2 192.115.133.185
if [ "$?" != "0" ]; then
poff -a
killall pppd
killall pptp
rm -rf /var/run/pptp
rm -rf /var/lock/LCK..pts_0
sleep 5
/usr/sbin/pptp 10.0.0.138 --quirks BEZEQ_ISRAEL user [EMAI
Title: הודעה
Hi all
The man page doesn't *really* say
what it's .Does anyone know what is the exact
meaning of this field - it's hard to belive that rss is the the number if
current memory resident in 1024 bytes. I run several examples that show
itthe man
page for rss
-- rss the r
Hi,
I have implemented the following Crontab record to monitor my ADSL, and bring it up
when it comes done:
if ! ping -c 1 -n 192.114.47.250 > /dev/null ; then killall -KILL pptp ; logger ADSL
connection stopped ; /usr/sbin/adsl-up ; logger ADSL connection started; fi
It doesn't work well :(, I
On Tue, Dec 16, 2003, Alon Weinstein wrote about "Re: Various performance problems":
> >http://www.mail-archive.com/[EMAIL PROTECTED]/msg30749.html
> >
> >(summary - nadav harel, checks why hspell on redhat 9 runs several times
> >slower then on redhat 7.something, and finds that changing the
> >LD
Muli Ben-Yehuda wrote:
On Tue, Dec 16, 2003 at 09:21:27AM +0200, Alon Weinstein wrote:
cat /etc/ld.so.conf, assuming it hasn't been changed since the last
time someone ran ldconfig.
Looking at /etc/ld.so.conf:
/usr/kerberos/lib
/usr/X11R6/lib
/usr/lib/qt-3.1/lib
/opt/opengroupware.org/Libraries
On Tue, Dec 16, 2003 at 09:21:27AM +0200, Alon Weinstein wrote:
[snip]
> And another question, for the uninitiated (that's me) -- when I try to
> output $LD_LIBRARY_PATH I get nothing. How can I find out what are the
> default libraries used by the system?
RTFM - man ld.so .
Basically /etc/ld.so
On Tue, Dec 16, 2003 at 09:21:27AM +0200, Alon Weinstein wrote:
> That's a very interesting thread I'm wondering -- would I gain a
> performance boost by making my RH9 always use /lib/i686 instead of
> /lib/tls?
Possibly, due to a bug in RH 9's NPTL implementation, IIRC.
> And another ques
Alon Weinstein <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> And another question, for the uninitiated (that's me) -- when I try to
> output $LD_LIBRARY_PATH I get nothing. How can I find out what are the
> default libraries used by the system?
cat /etc/ld.so.conf
See also
man 8 ldconfig
man 8 ld.so
--
Oleg
Shaul Karl wrote:
Aren't pon* and plog debian specific? Did I miss the original poster
mentioning of the distribution he is using or did he in fact haven't
mentioned it? In any case, the distribution one is using is yet one more
item that is worth mentioning.
The distribution is gentoo. They
guy keren wrote:
On Mon, 15 Dec 2003, Shachar Shemesh wrote:
I have a (couple of) client(s) that have performance problems across
linux distirbutions. That is - they try an operation on a given platform
with a given (redhat both cases) distribution, and get a certain
performance. Then they try th
41 matches
Mail list logo
