Re: IFRAME alternative

2003-09-12 Thread Oleg Kobets
Actually, no. All of my html's are text/html. Maybe it has something to do with charset=windows-1255 ? Oleg. - Original Message - From: "Sagi Bashari" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: "Oleg Kobets" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Cc: "Linux-IL" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Sent: Friday, September 12, 2003 8:55 PM Su

Re: IFRAME alternative

2003-09-12 Thread Ilya Konstantinov
On Friday 12 September 2003 22:39, Oleg Kobets wrote: > Hi. > > I have built a site (http://pagan.clean-mail.net) and in the Article Loader > screen I use IFRAME to load the external html document. > > Now, it looks great in IE, NS6+ and should look good in Opera as well. The > problem is Mozilla.

Re: IFRAME alternative

2003-09-12 Thread Sagi Bashari
On 12/09/2003 22:39, Oleg Kobets wrote: Hi. I have built a site (http://pagan.clean-mail.net) and in the Article Loader screen I use IFRAME to load the external html document. Now, it looks great in IE, NS6+ and should look good in Opera as well. The problem is Mozilla. It does not do the parsing

IFRAME alternative

2003-09-12 Thread Oleg Kobets
Hi. I have built a site (http://pagan.clean-mail.net) and in the Article Loader screen I use IFRAME to load the external html document. Now, it looks great in IE, NS6+ and should look good in Opera as well. The problem is Mozilla. It does not do the parsing of HTML inside the IFRAME and shows it

Re: [OT] Digital Cameras and Linux

2003-09-12 Thread Ilya Konstantinov
On Friday 12 September 2003 13:16, Geoffrey S. Mendelson wrote: > I then printed it on my EPSON 720 dpi printer in color. The reason to use > color for a black and white photograph is that the color of the "black" ink > that Epson uses is not to my liking and I can adjust the blackness of the > ink

Re: [OT] Old Hardware

2003-09-12 Thread Lior Kaplan
After a few talks with people, I thought it would be nice to publish what I want and what I can give:   My wish list: 1. A socket 370 processor. 2. A slot 1 processor. 3. SDRAM memory cards. 4. ATX power supplier.   My just-come-and-get-it list: 1. 1 * mini case + 200W AT power supplier.  2. 

Re: [OT] Digital Cameras and Linux

2003-09-12 Thread Boaz Rymland
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: It's going to be an ad, but they earned it - Go to Jugend Brothers (pronounced "Yugend") at 5 Hayarkon St. in Tel-Aviv. They are a pro shop and their prices are fair and their advice is good (I could have bought my camera there for almost the same price as abroad, onl

Re: [OT] Digital Cameras and Linux

2003-09-12 Thread Oleg Goldshmidt
Alex Shnitman <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > In any case, you haven't yet said anything about your budget... I think > more information in that direction would help a lot. It is somewhat stretchable: I would very much prefer to get something under $300, but if a somewhat higher price gets me a sig

Re: [OT] Digital Cameras and Linux

2003-09-12 Thread linux-il
Oleg Goldshmidt wrote: "Geoffrey S. Mendelson" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: I found that the best way to use a digital camera is to treat the memory cards as film. You buy several of them acording to your needs and replace one when it gets full. What's wrong with dumping files onto a hard

Re: [OT] Digital Cameras and Linux

2003-09-12 Thread Geoffrey S. Mendelson
Oleg Goldshmidt wrote: > > > Also without going into the physics of it here (this is a linux > > group after all), a two million pixel camera is all that you need. > > As you know perfectly well, Geoff, I am a physicist by training. ;-) Yes, and I would gladly discuss the subject with anyone at

GIMP [was Re: [OT] Digital Cameras and Linux]

2003-09-12 Thread Shlomi Fish
On Thu, 11 Sep 2003, Official Flamer/Cabal NON-Leader wrote: > Quoth Geoffrey S. Mendelson: > > > GIMP is an excelent photo editor. Photoshop is better because there are > > more features, more commercial plug-ins and better documentation. For Photoshop has more features than GIMP? From when? FYI

Re: [OT] Digital Cameras and Linux

2003-09-12 Thread Alex Shnitman
On Fri, 2003-09-12 at 12:18, Oleg Goldshmidt wrote: > "Geoffrey S. Mendelson" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > > > Also without going into the physics of it here (this is a linux > > group after all), a two million pixel camera is all that you need. > > As you know perfectly well, Geoff, I am a phys

Re: [OT] Digital Cameras and Linux

2003-09-12 Thread Oleg Goldshmidt
"Geoffrey S. Mendelson" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > Also without going into the physics of it here (this is a linux > group after all), a two million pixel camera is all that you need. As you know perfectly well, Geoff, I am a physicist by training. ;-) Is the 2Mpx number anything deeper than

Re: [OT] Digital Cameras and Linux

2003-09-12 Thread David Howard
On Thu, 2003-09-11 at 19:35, Oleg Goldshmidt wrote: > Hi, > > I am considering getting a digital camera (for amateur, not > professional, use), with the obvious requirement that it will interact > flawlessly with my Linux computers (desktops and laptop). [snipped] > Info relevant to makes and mode

Re: [OT] Digital Cameras and Linux

2003-09-12 Thread Oleg Kobets
And even more importantly, how well does camera shoots in a dark, or without any light at all. Oleg. > when you buy a camera, do note: > > 1. how large is the _optical_ zoom (a digital zoom, as far as i >understood, is generaly quite pointless). > 2. what kind of lens it has (if you know anyt