On Mon, 4 Aug 2003, Oleg Kobets wrote:
> Hi.
>
> Since RedHat is a common name taken from a fairy tale, we can and will use
> the name to desribe the distro. If by their policy you cannot use the logo,
> then don't, but we shure can say "it's a distro that is essentialy a red
> hat". There is no
On Sun, 03 Aug 2003 22:49:10 +0300
Gilad Ben-Yossef <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Now, the big 9,000,000$ question is:
>
> Does this violate the principles of Free Software (note that I didn't
> say anything about the GPL license - IANAL, I'm asking if you think it
> hurts violates the philosoph
Hi.
Since RedHat is a common name taken from a fairy tale, we can and will use
the name to desribe the distro. If by their policy you cannot use the logo,
then don't, but we shure can say "it's a distro that is essentialy a red
hat". There is no violation there (I am not a lawyer) and it is ok.
T
Howdie,
Since I posted some info on the subject in the past, and since this
generated a lot of off list interest and because was looking for info
about the subject myself because of this and couldn't find any until
now, you might be interesting in the following:
http://www.redhat.com/about/cor
Hi friends.
The Linux Conference and installation party is coming (Aug 22 in Tel-Aviv at
John-Bryce)
I need 3 Linux installers (RedHat 9) that know how to install, configure and
show it to newbies.
Please feel free to call me at 052482173.
Thanks Miki (Moshe) Barzilay
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
=
On Sun, 3 Aug 2003, Vasiliev Michael wrote:
> On Sunday 03 August 2003 12:01, Shlomi Fish wrote:
> > I recently installed pine on my home computer. In my /etc/pine.conf file I
> > have:
> >
> > normal-foreground-color=black
> > normal-background-color=white
> >
> > However, the background is displ
On Sun, Aug 03, 2003 at 03:26:51PM +0300, Mix Sella wrote:
> On Saturday 02 August 2003 17:56, Shaul Karl wrote:
> > $ /usr/sbin/pppd call provider dryrun
> > /usr/sbin/pppd: bad local IP address 127.0.0.1
> > $
> >
> > What does that means? It is only obtained with non root user.
>
On Wed, Jul 30, 2003 at 09:30:12PM +0300, Oded Arbel wrote:
> On Wednesday 30 July 2003 19:00, Sagi Bashari wrote:
> > >1) Hebrew pages are sent as "western" encoding...
> > >the text is right but for some reason the browser sets itself to "western"
> > >instead of Hebrew.
> > >if I set it to "Hebr
On Saturday 02 August 2003 17:56, Shaul Karl wrote:
> $ /usr/sbin/pppd call provider dryrun
> /usr/sbin/pppd: bad local IP address 127.0.0.1
> $
>
> What does that means? It is only obtained with non root user.
Try putting ``noipdefault'' in the privileged global options file.
See p
Hi all,
I just wanted to clear something. Signing a document ( i.e. file ) is
NOT an identification ! Showing your ID card to someone is
identification, also entering password to your account ( with or without
the use of Kerberos ). Therefore all the picture issue is out of context
here.
Signing a
On Sunday 03 August 2003 12:01, Shlomi Fish wrote:
> I recently installed pine on my home computer. In my /etc/pine.conf file I
> have:
>
> normal-foreground-color=black
> normal-background-color=white
>
> However, the background is displayed in an nnoying colour of light gray.
> How do I set it to
Greetings all.
Right now I'm in a summer vacation up to October, which will be followed
by a Semester in which I'll learn only two days a week. Thus, I'm looking
for a job. You can find two versions of my resume (one with more details)
here:
http://t2.technion.ac.il/~shlomif/me/
Note that after
I recently installed pine on my home computer. In my /etc/pine.conf file I
have:
normal-foreground-color=black
normal-background-color=white
However, the background is displayed in an nnoying colour of light gray.
How do I set it to true white? My default terminal colours are white as
the backgr
> -Original Message-
> From: Shaul Karl [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Sent: Saturday, August 02, 2003 5:43 AM
[snip]
Hello all
You are talking about the SPAM problem but ignoring a bigger problem: The misuse of
SMTP.
This announcement is automatic; yet instead of replying to the envelope
On Saturday 02 August 2003 17:59, Vasiliev Michael wrote:
> On Saturday 02 August 2003 14:33, Guy Cohen wrote:
> > They still do nothing.
> >
> > This is absolutly disrespct for good paying customers!!!
>
> Well, once, in my free time, I interviewed a number of well known sysadmins
> on a certain I
On Saturday 02 August 2003 05:42, Shaul Karl wrote:
> I got a similar message for the 2 last messages that I have sent to
> the list. I guess that I will have another one for this message too. Was
> there a modification to the list policies lately regarding the header of
> the messages that are s
16 matches
Mail list logo
