RE: problem with connecting to a microsoft Proxy server

2003-06-04 Thread Assaf Flatto
True but this doesn't help me either since i do not want to run the mozilla on a windows station but on my linux PC . and so far i can't reach the net to d/l any new software. Assaf -Original Message- From: Ilya Konstantinov [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Wednesday, June 04, 2003 12:17

Re: SCO vs IBM on yesterday's HaAretz

2003-06-04 Thread Hetz Ben-Hamo
Try this: http://news.walla.co.il/?w=/4/395478/@@/item/printer No registration required ;) Hetz -- Original Message --- From: Dan Kenigsberg <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: iglu <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Sent: Wed, 4 Jun 2003 11:20:23 +0300 Subject: SCO vs IBM on yesterday's HaAr

Re: SCO SCO SCO (or whatever)

2003-06-04 Thread Nadav Har'El
On Tue, Jun 03, 2003, Shachar Shemesh wrote about "Re: SCO SCO SCO (or whatever)": > Creating awarness with those journalists take time. We sent one press > release about Haifux already. I missed the HSpell announcement. Since Hspell became a favorite example here, I think I better comment on it.

SCO vs IBM on yesterday's HaAretz

2003-06-04 Thread Dan Kenigsberg
If you would like to read about it from a Microsoft- and Bush- bashing article, take a look at (reg. req.) http://www.haaretz.co.il/hasite/pages/ShArtSR.jhtml?itemNo=299720&objNo=10045&returnParam=Y -- Dan Kenigsberghttp://www.cs.technion.ac.il/~dankenICQ 162180901 ==

Modern SCO Executive

2003-06-04 Thread Ira Abramov
on a lighter note, this filk is by two members of the SVlug: http://twiki.iwethey.org/twiki/bin/view/Main/PiratesOfPenguinance (Apologies to Gilbert, Sullivan, and most of humanity) -- Next step in human evolution Ira Abramov http://ira.abramov.org/email/ ==

Solved - Temporary malfunctioning of email on linux.org.il

2003-06-04 Thread Ilya Konstantinov
For an hour or two, linux.org.il might've refused emails send to it, including emails sent to linux-il. This, of course, is just a forwarder address and the list was always accessible via the address at cs.huji.ac.il. I apologize for the inconvenience caused by those problems caused by my incom

Re: SCO SCO SCO (or whatever)

2003-06-04 Thread Meir Kriheli
On Tuesday 03 June 2003 22:59, Shachar Shemesh wrote: > As for you, Meir. I wrote a long email, only to realize I'm too angry > and hurt to click "send" without regretting it later on. Read my > previous post, show some interest in actively helpin, send your comments > to me or the board in private

Re: SCO SCO SCO (or whatever)

2003-06-04 Thread Meir Kriheli
On Tuesday 03 June 2003 21:36, Tzafrir Cohen wrote: > On Tue, Jun 03, 2003 at 09:16:59PM +0300, Meir Kriheli wrote: > > On Tuesday 03 June 2003 20:49, Tzafrir Cohen wrote: > > > To what address should announcements be sent? Are there any problems > > > with UTF-8 text? > > > > All *Nuke systems hav

Re: SCO SCO SCO (or whatever)

2003-06-04 Thread Shachar Shemesh
Meir Kriheli wrote: Wouldn't it save resources if a "Press Release" was issued ? It have saved us the time to translate it, and Nadav's time coming and "fixing" it. To what address should announcements be sent? Are there any problems with UTF-8 text? All *Nuke systems have a simply way

Re: SCO SCO SCO (or whatever)

2003-06-04 Thread Tzafrir Cohen
On Tue, Jun 03, 2003 at 09:16:59PM +0300, Meir Kriheli wrote: > On Tuesday 03 June 2003 20:49, Tzafrir Cohen wrote: > > > > To what address should announcements be sent? Are there any problems with > > UTF-8 text? > > All *Nuke systems have a simply way to submit stories via the web interface. Kn

Re: SCO SCO SCO (or whatever)

2003-06-04 Thread Meir Kriheli
On Tuesday 03 June 2003 20:49, Tzafrir Cohen wrote: > On Tue, Jun 03, 2003 at 07:52:25PM +0300, Meir Kriheli wrote: > > [ snip ] > > > There's one thing we must realize: > > > > The stage of early adapters and techies adopting FOSS is reaching the > > end. From now on we are facing a uphill PR batt

Re: Linux distro for old computers

2003-06-04 Thread Hetz Ben Hamo
> This is silly. I use gnome-latest in debian unstable on a PII266 with > 64MB of memory, and it works fine. It doesn't fly, but it works. Yeah, I run KDE CVS on such a low end machine too (after compiling it with prelinking, disable-debug, enable-final where it's possible) - and that could run.

Re: SCO SCO SCO (or whatever)

2003-06-04 Thread Tzafrir Cohen
On Tue, Jun 03, 2003 at 07:52:25PM +0300, Meir Kriheli wrote: [ snip ] > There's one thing we must realize: > > The stage of early adapters and techies adopting FOSS is reaching the end. > From now on we are facing a uphill PR battle. > > We're nearing a stage off public non techie adoption. A

Re: Linux distro for old computers

2003-06-04 Thread Diego Iastrubni
I know people running in some 266 pc's, kde cvs. They are using gentoo, but it is optimized as any redhat/mdk for that arch. OO will be out of the question, but I can be wrong... However more ram is a good idea (and cheap, you can get 128mb for about 50nis I would guess). ביום שלישי, 3 ביוני 2

Re: SCO SCO SCO (or whatever)

2003-06-04 Thread Meir Kriheli
On Tuesday 03 June 2003 17:38, Shachar Shemesh wrote: > Dittigas wrote: > > Having been contributing to whatsup (www.whatsup.org.il) for a while > > now, I think it has clearly become the de-facto leader of news and > > support alternative to Israeli FOSS users. For the last 1.5 years I > > have se

Re: [OT] BEOS IS ALIVE!!!!1!

2003-06-04 Thread Oron Peled
On 03 Jun 2003 11:12:43 +0300 Gilboa Davara <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > B. Events (posix conditions). > Wait it doesn't work right (PulseEvent never did... MS, like MS, just > refuses to fix it), NT events are much easier to use, and have much > better control. The posix conditions are a just pai

Re: [OT] BEOS IS ALIVE!!!!1!

2003-06-04 Thread Oron Peled
On Tue, 3 Jun 2003 13:58:43 +0300 Muli Ben-Yehuda <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > - 2.5 adds system calls for manipulating a task's processor > affinity: sched_getaffinity() and sched_setaffinity() > > I haven't checked if RH 9.0 includes a backport of it to their 2.4 > kernel. (It's pretty trivia

Re: SCO SCO SCO (or whatever)

2003-06-04 Thread Shachar Shemesh
Dittigas wrote: Having been contributing to whatsup (www.whatsup.org.il) for a while now, I think it has clearly become the de-facto leader of news and support alternative to Israeli FOSS users. For the last 1.5 years I have seen it grow from a meer few dozens registered users, to full blown 8

Re: SCO SCO SCO (or whatever)

2003-06-04 Thread Dittigas
Having been contributing to whatsup (www.whatsup.org.il) for a while now, I think it has clearly become the de-facto leader of news and support alternative to Israeli FOSS users. For the last 1.5 years I have seen it grow from a meer few dozens registered users, to full blown 800+ with over 1M

Re: Force reboot a machine?

2003-06-04 Thread Idan Sofer
> On Tue, Jun 03, 2003 at 02:23:16PM +0300, Shachar Shemesh wrote: > > On a side note, what's 2.4.18-8? I thought debian went with vanilla > always? Debian's kernel source packages are not plain vanilla, the maintainers add couple of patches, mostly removal of non-free stuff(driver that contain fi

Re: Force reboot a machine?

2003-06-04 Thread Shachar Shemesh
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: And where would you connect that RJ45? This part of the discussion reminds me that back about 7 years ago when I took part in some tiny ISP there was some hub laying around there which could take serial cables and make them available over telnet, (each serial port mapped

Re: Force reboot a machine?

2003-06-04 Thread linux_il
On Tue, Jun 03, 2003 at 04:26:14PM +0300, Shaul Karl wrote: > On Tue, Jun 03, 2003 at 02:23:16PM +0300, Shachar Shemesh wrote: > > > > About serial consol - anyone has a > > RJ-45 to D9 serial cable? > > And where would you connect that RJ45? This part of the d