RE: root fs mount options

2003-02-10 Thread linux_il
Zombies are walking dead - don't worry about them too much except that it would be nice to get rid of them. I wonder if maybe one of them is a child of the other and there are supposed to be two processes? > -Original Message- > From: Michael Sternberg > [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] > Sent:

RE: root fs mount options

2003-02-10 Thread Michael Sternberg
> -Original Message- > From: Michael Sternberg [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] > > How can I tell kernel what mount options to use when mount root fs ("/") ? > I have in kernel command line "root=/dev/mtdblock0 rw" and want to use > mount option "noatime" for faster access. Hello I hate to ans

RE: xkb handling in upcoming 4.3.0

2003-02-10 Thread linux_il
I'd like to concur with that! I though that I missed the line of this discussion because some positions sounded so wierd (mainly stuff like Shift-9 opening braces all the time). Not until this reversing began with KDE have I ever had problems with braces in any language I used on computers and no

root fs mount options

2003-02-10 Thread Michael Sternberg
Hello How can I tell kernel what mount options to use when mount root fs ("/") ? I have in kernel command line "root=/dev/mtdblock0 rw" and want to use mount option "noatime" for faster access. I already RTFM `man mount` and linux/Documentation/kernel-parameters.txt Thanks, Micha

Re: Weird IP problem...

2003-02-10 Thread Michael Sternberg
> -Original Message- > From: Alex Shnitman [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] > On Mon, 2003-02-10 at 17:17, Ira Abramov wrote: > > Quoting Michael Sternberg, from the post of Mon, 10 Feb: > > > > > > > > Errr... MAC address or IP address? Why the hell play with the MAC > > > > address? > > > > >

Re: KCrorn - Solved

2003-02-10 Thread Amichai Rotman
Hi Tzafrir, Your solution did it ! Thanks, Amichai. On Saturday 08 February 2003 21:37, you wrote: > On Sat, 8 Feb 2003, Amichai Rotman wrote: > > Hi Clan, > > > > I am trying to run a cron job to use the record command as follows: > > > > KDEDIR/bin/konsole -e /usr/bin/record -cv -t 00:15 > >

Re: xkb handling in upcoming 4.3.0

2003-02-10 Thread Diego Iastrubni
Then we agree: it's a bug in X. Who shall report? Note to self: dont upgrade to X 4.3 yet. - diego ביום שני, 10 בפברואר 2003, 10:34, Lars Knoll כתב: > > On Sun, 9 Feb 2003, Diego Iastrubni wrote: > > > well, I do think that it should be done by a higher level toolkit. Like > > > in windows..

Re: mplayer 0.90 is around the corner

2003-02-10 Thread Ely Levy
what was the end in the argument between mplayer's dev and debian about the license thing? (I hope they would get GUI to work normaly before 0.90..) Ely Levy System group Hebrew University Jerusalem Israel On Mon, 10 Feb 2003, Ira Abramov wrote: > Winner of the 2002 most-annoying-to-compile a

Re: What is missing before we have out-of-the-box Linux Hebrewexperience in RedHat 8.0/Gnome desktop?

2003-02-10 Thread Oron Peled
On Mon, 10 Feb 2003 11:36:22 +0200 "Nadav Har'El" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > On Mon, Feb 10, 2003, Omer Zak wrote: > >A full reboot of the machine fixed this problem. > > The slogan goes "Linux: Because rebooting is for changing hardware" :) Well said. > I believe that if you kill the fon

Graphic toolkit for guile (a Scheme interpreter)?

2003-02-10 Thread Omer Zak
I am trying to get hold on a graphic toolkit for Scheme, which works with guile. I have browsed the Scheme, guile, GTk+, STk Web sites, and found the following: guile-gtk-0.19.tar.gz guile-gtk-1.2-0.31.tar.gz STk-4.0.1-1.i586.rpm However, it seems that no matter which version I choose, its docume

Re: xkb handling in upcoming 4.3.0

2003-02-10 Thread Oron Peled
On Sun, 9 Feb 2003 21:53:49 +0200 Diego Iastrubni <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Please remember that shift9 means open braces, and shift0 means close them. > How they are represented on screen is another thing. No! shift-9 contains engraving (on the plastic) of *left parenthesis* Under your interp

Re: Looking for a sound recorder

2003-02-10 Thread Beni Cherniavsky
On 2003-02-10, David Harel wrote: > I am looking for a sound recorder like the simple one that Windows has. > I found sox but it is a command line application and I need it to have > graphical interface. > Sweep_ is a nice editor. It should be able to record too but I didn't test it. . _Sweep: h

Re: Weird IP problem...

2003-02-10 Thread Alex Shnitman
On Mon, 2003-02-10 at 17:17, Ira Abramov wrote: > Quoting Michael Sternberg, from the post of Mon, 10 Feb: > > > Errr... MAC address or IP address? Why the hell play with the MAC > > > address? > > > > Because they all coming from production facilities with MAC > > of 00:00:00:00:00:00. I just hav

Re: Weird IP problem...

2003-02-10 Thread Nadav Har'El
On Mon, Feb 10, 2003, Ira Abramov wrote about "Re: Weird IP problem...": > > Because they all coming from production facilities with MAC > > of 00:00:00:00:00:00. I just have to change it to something > > reasonable in bootloader. > > say WHAT? > never heard of an OEM releasing such faulty hardwa

Re: Weird IP problem...

2003-02-10 Thread Official Flamer/Cabal NON-Leader
Quoth Michael Sternberg: > Because they all coming from production facilities with MAC > of 00:00:00:00:00:00. I just have to change it to something > reasonable in bootloader. Meir, could you please tell us who is the AH who builds nics with nulled macs? That is a crime against humanity. OZ: Yo

Re: Weird IP problem...

2003-02-10 Thread Ira Abramov
Quoting Michael Sternberg, from the post of Mon, 10 Feb: > > Errr... MAC address or IP address? Why the hell play with the MAC > > address? > > Because they all coming from production facilities with MAC > of 00:00:00:00:00:00. I just have to change it to something > reasonable in bootloader. sa

RE: Weird IP problem...

2003-02-10 Thread Michael Sternberg
> -Original Message- > From: Official Flamer/Cabal NON-Leader > > > No, two machines with the same MAC are two different > > PPC machines that MAC address can be set up by ignorant > > user (like me :). > > Errr... MAC address or IP address? Why the hell play with the MAC > address? Becau

Re: Weird IP problem...

2003-02-10 Thread Official Flamer/Cabal NON-Leader
Quoth Michael Sternberg: > No, two machines with the same MAC are two different > PPC machines that MAC address can be set up by ignorant > user (like me :). Errr... MAC address or IP address? Why the hell play with the MAC address? -- ---OFCNL This is MY list. This list belongs to ME! I

RE: Weird IP problem...

2003-02-10 Thread Michael Sternberg
> -Original Message- > From: Official Flamer/Cabal NON-Leader > > > It seems that there were two computers with > > same MAC address as of 172.17.4.202 on local > > subnet. Thanks everybody. > > TWO machines with the SAME MAC address is one machine with a > damaged NIC or spoofed MAC. No,

Re: Weird IP problem...

2003-02-10 Thread Official Flamer/Cabal NON-Leader
Quoth Michael Sternberg: > > Sorry, my mistake. > It seems that there were two computers with > same MAC address as of 172.17.4.202 on local > subnet. Thanks everybody. TWO machines with the SAME MAC address is one machine with a damaged NIC or spoofed MAC. Marc -- ---OFCNL This is MY lis

Re: Re: Re: xkb handling in upcoming 4.3.0

2003-02-10 Thread Ely Levy
that would sure have saved us a lot of troubles, but I also heard that there was some patch to pervious X version that add bidi support anyone remembers? does it work? Ely Levy System group Hebrew University Jerusalem Israel On Mon, 10 Feb 2003, Tzafrir Cohen wrote: > On Sun, 9 Feb 2003, Diego

Re: Weird IP problem...

2003-02-10 Thread Omer Zak
1. Does each computer successfully ping itself in its own NIC's IP address? 2. Does 172.17.4.1 communicate with other computers in the network? 3. Does 172.17.4.202 communicate with other computers in the network? 4. While there is no firewall, is there a bridge or router between them? My suspi

RE: What is missing before we have out-of-the-box Linux Hebrew ex perience in RedHat 8.0/Gnome desktop?

2003-02-10 Thread linux_il
> On Mon, 10 Feb 2003 [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > > > Interesting read (though I'm a Debian user). > > What complementary actions does one need to do to get full Hebrew in a > modern Debian installation? I'd love to answer that, but I always was hazy about hebrew/character-sets/keyboard bindings

Re: What is missing before we have out-of-the-box Linux Hebrew experience in RedHat 8.0/Gnome desktop?

2003-02-10 Thread Nadav Har'El
On Mon, Feb 10, 2003, Omer Zak wrote about "What is missing before we have out-of-the-box Linux Hebrew experience in RedHat 8.0/Gnome desktop?": >I tried to restart xft (the X Font Server), and after it was restarted, >several font-using applications (emacs, AbiWord, gedit, etc.) failed >

RE: What is missing before we have out-of-the-box Linux Hebrew experience in RedHat 8.0/Gnome desktop?

2003-02-10 Thread Omer Zak
On Mon, 10 Feb 2003 [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > Interesting read (though I'm a Debian user). What complementary actions does one need to do to get full Hebrew in a modern Debian installation? > > I tried to restart xft (the X Font Server), and after it > > was restarted, > > several font-using

Re: xkb handling in upcoming 4.3.0

2003-02-10 Thread Lars Knoll
> On Sun, 9 Feb 2003, Diego Iastrubni wrote: > > well, I do think that it should be done by a higher level toolkit. Like > > in windows > > > > Please remember that shift9 means open braces, and shift0 means close > > them. How they are represented on screen is another thing. X is doing > > so

Re: xkb handling in upcoming 4.3.0

2003-02-10 Thread Lars Knoll
> well, I do think that it should be done by a higher level toolkit. Like in > windows > > Please remember that shift9 means open braces, and shift0 means close them. Yes, and if XFree 4.3 fixed the keymap, it's very simple to fix in Qt. I'll just remove the hack I introduced to fix XFrees b

Re: xkb handling in upcoming 4.3.0

2003-02-10 Thread Meir Kriheli
On Saturday 08 February 2003 19:20, Tzafrir Cohen wrote: 10x for the informative links. > On Sat, 8 Feb 2003, Meir Kriheli wrote: > Two other notes: > > * the reason for this change is to make keyboard configuration in linux > easier. There is still the limit of 4 layouts ("groups") that is proba

RE: What is missing before we have out-of-the-box Linux Hebrew experience in RedHat 8.0/Gnome desktop?

2003-02-10 Thread linux_il
Interesting read (though I'm a Debian user). >I tried to restart xft (the X Font Server), and after it > was restarted, >several font-using applications (emacs, AbiWord, gedit, > etc.) failed >at startup due to failure to find fonts. >A full reboot of the machine fixed this probl

What is missing before we have out-of-the-box Linux Hebrew experiencein RedHat 8.0/Gnome desktop?

2003-02-10 Thread Omer Zak
In this message I'm trying to determine what is still missing from standard Linux distributions before full out-of-the-box support for Hebrew can be claimed. What I am doing here is "gap analysis" - analysis of the gap between full out-of-the-box Linux Hebrew experience and what we have today. I