guy keren <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> On Wed, 4 Dec 2002, Michael Sternberg wrote:
>
> > Oleg Goldshmidt wrote:
> > > Use recursive make:
> > > ppc:
> > > $(MAKE) ARCH=PPC
> >
> >
> > It does not work.
> > Here is a simple makefile:
> >
> > ppc:
> > @ $(MAKE) ARCH=PPC
>
> obviously, y
On Thu, 5 Dec 2002, guy keren wrote:
>
> Makefiles should not be medled with. if you try to do something
> complicated - most likely you'll fail, cause the language that gmake (and
> the commercial 'make' variants) supports - are very very limited.
A chalange, then, ha?
(reading the gnu-make man
On Wed, 4 Dec 2002, Michael Sternberg wrote:
> Oleg Goldshmidt wrote:
> > Use recursive make:
> > ppc:
> > $(MAKE) ARCH=PPC
>
>
> It does not work.
> Here is a simple makefile:
>
> ppc:
> @ $(MAKE) ARCH=PPC
obviously, you did not read what oleg wrote - and modified his suggestion.
I did not try reinstalling RH7.3, but got it right anyway, although only with
mplayer.
The problem (for future reference, for google searches):
I installed xine, videolan::client (vlc), ogle and mplayer, all from
freshrpms.net, all for RedHat 8.0. All dependency problems where solved.
However,
I'll definately be attending. However, I'd like to suggest re-arranging the priorities
a little :-)
Seems more logical, at least to me, to have printing and hardware issues before
development and the web server thing. Just a thought...
Eli
04/12/02 13:57:24, Eddie Aronovich <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wr
feasible for anybody in the private sector. If it was moved even a half hour
forward it would be more reasonable - allows one to get out of work and get to
TAU, if one is in TA/RG.
A full hour forward is even better, so that I don't have to miss my
Discrete Math lecture :-)
Alexander (aka Sa
Quoting Eddie Aronovich <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
> For now there are lectures planned once on 2 weeks, on Mondays.
At 18:00. Darn. I've been wishing to attend regular linux lectures, but you
know, not all Linux enthusiasts are unemployed. 18:00 on a weekday is not
feasible for anybody in the private
Oleg Goldshmidt wrote:
> Use recursive make:
> ppc:
> $(MAKE) ARCH=PPC
It does not work.
Here is a simple makefile:
ppc:
@ $(MAKE) ARCH=PPC
debug:
@ echo performing $@ build for $ARCH
release:
@ echo performing $@ build for $ARCH
I run it with "make ppc debug"
Michael Sternberg <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> I run it with "make ppc debug" and wait to see
> "performing debug build for PPC"
I misunderstood your question. It's simpler, actually:
make debug ARCH=PPC
will work - what's wrong with that?
--
Oleg Goldshmidt | [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Who is paying for this?
(sorry, the start of the thread didn't get to my mailbox)
I will gladly except this work.
Please see my references at http://www.uadm.com
On Wed, Dec 04, 2002 at 01:45:00PM +0200, Orna Agmon wrote:
> On Wed, 4 Dec 2002, Max K. wrote:
>
> > On Tue, 3 Dec 2002, Shachar Sh
On Wed, 4 Dec 2002, Max K. wrote:
> On Tue, 3 Dec 2002, Shachar Shemesh wrote:
>
> > Hi all,
> >
> > During last Linux instaparty, one of the (only) people who came took the
> > RedHat 8.0 CDs, but did not have a computer ready. She asked whether we
> if it's a she, i think there won't be a probl
Following some requests for lectures about Linux at Tel-Aviv University (
Ariel Biner & Didi Bar-David talked about it over the mailing list) - it
comes to be true.
For now there are lectures planned once on 2 weeks, on Mondays.
The coming lectures appear on the web site:
http://www.cs.tau.ac.i
Michael Sternberg <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> I would like to set up a taget in a makefile that will only define
> some variable, and it will be used in the next target,
Use recursive make:
ppc:
$(MAKE) ARCH=PPC
--
Oleg Goldshmidt | [EMAIL PROTECTED]
===
On Wed, 4 Dec 2002, Michael Sternberg wrote:
>
> I would like to set up a taget in a makefile that will only define
> some variable, and it will be used in the next target, something
> like this:
>
> ppc :
> ARCH = PPC
>
Won't autoconf be better for this specific need? Autoconf can detec
I would like to set up a taget in a makefile that will only define
some variable, and it will be used in the next target, something
like this:
ppc :
ARCH = PPC
release:
ifeq ($(ARCH),PPC)
echo start ppc compiler with ppc flags
else
echo do something else
endif
And I woul
Oleg Goldshmidt wrote:
Also, do you really want to start dealing with the IRS (mas-hachnasa) ?
cause something tells me you will, eventually ...
I can see mas-hachnasa supina-ing his records, or interogating him.
I certainly do not see how Shachar or the list (which is not a legal
entity as
Guy Baruch <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> Also, do you really want to start dealing with the IRS (mas-hachnasa) ?
> cause something tells me you will, eventually ...
I certainly do not see how Shachar or the list (which is not a legal
entity as far as I can tell) can be held responsible for financ
I may be a bit paranoid here, but I think there may be implications
you're not aware of.
what is some criminal element takes advantage of this list ? (wether sex
or property
crime, or even terrorists; remember the poor 16-yr old who got seduced
to ramalla
thru the internet, and then murdered.)
On Wed, 4 Dec 2002, Max K. wrote:
> On Tue, 3 Dec 2002, Shachar Shemesh wrote:
>
> > Hi all,
> >
> > During last Linux instaparty, one of the (only) people who came took the
> > RedHat 8.0 CDs, but did not have a computer ready. She asked whether we
>
> if it's a she, i think there won't be a prob
> Max K. wrote:
>
>if it's a she, i think there won't be a problem to find a hundred of
>volunteers.
>say no more.
OH look! Max has got a willie!
Way to go, Max. You are a truly Israeli male.
--
---OFCNL
This is MY list. This list belongs to ME! I will flame anyone I want.
Officia
Max K. wrote:
if it's a she, i think there won't be a problem to find a hundred of
volunteers.
say no more.
I seriously considered masking the fact that it's a "she" to prevent
precisely these kind of remarks. I think we had enough bad taste and
self humiliation the last time this subject
On Tue, 3 Dec 2002, Shachar Shemesh wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> During last Linux instaparty, one of the (only) people who came took the
> RedHat 8.0 CDs, but did not have a computer ready. She asked whether we
if it's a she, i think there won't be a problem to find a hundred of
volunteers.
say no more.
22 matches
Mail list logo