Re: makefile question

2002-12-04 Thread Oleg Goldshmidt
guy keren <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > On Wed, 4 Dec 2002, Michael Sternberg wrote: > > > Oleg Goldshmidt wrote: > > > Use recursive make: > > > ppc: > > > $(MAKE) ARCH=PPC > > > > > > It does not work. > > Here is a simple makefile: > > > > ppc: > > @ $(MAKE) ARCH=PPC > > obviously, y

Re: makefile question

2002-12-04 Thread Tzafrir Cohen
On Thu, 5 Dec 2002, guy keren wrote: > > Makefiles should not be medled with. if you try to do something > complicated - most likely you'll fail, cause the language that gmake (and > the commercial 'make' variants) supports - are very very limited. A chalange, then, ha? (reading the gnu-make man

Re: makefile question

2002-12-04 Thread guy keren
On Wed, 4 Dec 2002, Michael Sternberg wrote: > Oleg Goldshmidt wrote: > > Use recursive make: > > ppc: > > $(MAKE) ARCH=PPC > > > It does not work. > Here is a simple makefile: > > ppc: > @ $(MAKE) ARCH=PPC obviously, you did not read what oleg wrote - and modified his suggestion.

SOLUTION: dvd player*s* show twice same half screen

2002-12-04 Thread Arie Folger
I did not try reinstalling RH7.3, but got it right anyway, although only with mplayer. The problem (for future reference, for google searches): I installed xine, videolan::client (vlc), ogle and mplayer, all from freshrpms.net, all for RedHat 8.0. All dependency problems where solved. However,

Re: You asked - we do !

2002-12-04 Thread voguemaster
I'll definately be attending. However, I'd like to suggest re-arranging the priorities a little :-) Seems more logical, at least to me, to have printing and hardware issues before development and the web server thing. Just a thought... Eli 04/12/02 13:57:24, Eddie Aronovich <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wr

Re: You asked - we do !

2002-12-04 Thread Alexander Maryanovsky
feasible for anybody in the private sector. If it was moved even a half hour forward it would be more reasonable - allows one to get out of work and get to TAU, if one is in TA/RG. A full hour forward is even better, so that I don't have to miss my Discrete Math lecture :-) Alexander (aka Sa

Re: You asked - we do !

2002-12-04 Thread herouth
Quoting Eddie Aronovich <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>: > For now there are lectures planned once on 2 weeks, on Mondays. At 18:00. Darn. I've been wishing to attend regular linux lectures, but you know, not all Linux enthusiasts are unemployed. 18:00 on a weekday is not feasible for anybody in the private

Re: makefile question

2002-12-04 Thread Michael Sternberg
Oleg Goldshmidt wrote: > Use recursive make: > ppc: > $(MAKE) ARCH=PPC It does not work. Here is a simple makefile: ppc: @ $(MAKE) ARCH=PPC debug: @ echo performing $@ build for $ARCH release: @ echo performing $@ build for $ARCH I run it with "make ppc debug"

Re: makefile question

2002-12-04 Thread Oleg Goldshmidt
Michael Sternberg <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > I run it with "make ppc debug" and wait to see > "performing debug build for PPC" I misunderstood your question. It's simpler, actually: make debug ARCH=PPC will work - what's wrong with that? -- Oleg Goldshmidt | [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Re: Payed Linux installers wanted

2002-12-04 Thread Guy Cohen
Who is paying for this? (sorry, the start of the thread didn't get to my mailbox) I will gladly except this work. Please see my references at http://www.uadm.com On Wed, Dec 04, 2002 at 01:45:00PM +0200, Orna Agmon wrote: > On Wed, 4 Dec 2002, Max K. wrote: > > > On Tue, 3 Dec 2002, Shachar Sh

Re: Payed Linux installers wanted

2002-12-04 Thread Orna Agmon
On Wed, 4 Dec 2002, Max K. wrote: > On Tue, 3 Dec 2002, Shachar Shemesh wrote: > > > Hi all, > > > > During last Linux instaparty, one of the (only) people who came took the > > RedHat 8.0 CDs, but did not have a computer ready. She asked whether we > if it's a she, i think there won't be a probl

You asked - we do !

2002-12-04 Thread Eddie Aronovich
Following some requests for lectures about Linux at Tel-Aviv University ( Ariel Biner & Didi Bar-David talked about it over the mailing list) - it comes to be true. For now there are lectures planned once on 2 weeks, on Mondays. The coming lectures appear on the web site: http://www.cs.tau.ac.i

Re: makefile question

2002-12-04 Thread Oleg Goldshmidt
Michael Sternberg <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > I would like to set up a taget in a makefile that will only define > some variable, and it will be used in the next target, Use recursive make: ppc: $(MAKE) ARCH=PPC -- Oleg Goldshmidt | [EMAIL PROTECTED] ===

Re: makefile question

2002-12-04 Thread Orna Agmon
On Wed, 4 Dec 2002, Michael Sternberg wrote: > > I would like to set up a taget in a makefile that will only define > some variable, and it will be used in the next target, something > like this: > > ppc : > ARCH = PPC > Won't autoconf be better for this specific need? Autoconf can detec

makefile question

2002-12-04 Thread Michael Sternberg
I would like to set up a taget in a makefile that will only define some variable, and it will be used in the next target, something like this: ppc : ARCH = PPC release: ifeq ($(ARCH),PPC) echo start ppc compiler with ppc flags else echo do something else endif And I woul

Re: Payed Linux installers wanted

2002-12-04 Thread Guy Baruch
Oleg Goldshmidt wrote: Also, do you really want to start dealing with the IRS (mas-hachnasa) ? cause something tells me you will, eventually ... I can see mas-hachnasa supina-ing his records, or interogating him. I certainly do not see how Shachar or the list (which is not a legal entity as

Re: Payed Linux installers wanted

2002-12-04 Thread Oleg Goldshmidt
Guy Baruch <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > Also, do you really want to start dealing with the IRS (mas-hachnasa) ? > cause something tells me you will, eventually ... I certainly do not see how Shachar or the list (which is not a legal entity as far as I can tell) can be held responsible for financ

Re: Payed Linux installers wanted

2002-12-04 Thread Guy Baruch
I may be a bit paranoid here, but I think there may be implications you're not aware of. what is some criminal element takes advantage of this list ? (wether sex or property crime, or even terrorists; remember the poor 16-yr old who got seduced to ramalla thru the internet, and then murdered.)

Re: Payed Linux installers wanted

2002-12-04 Thread Tzafrir Cohen
On Wed, 4 Dec 2002, Max K. wrote: > On Tue, 3 Dec 2002, Shachar Shemesh wrote: > > > Hi all, > > > > During last Linux instaparty, one of the (only) people who came took the > > RedHat 8.0 CDs, but did not have a computer ready. She asked whether we > > if it's a she, i think there won't be a prob

Re: Payed Linux installers wanted

2002-12-04 Thread Official Flamer/Cabal NON-Leader
> Max K. wrote: > >if it's a she, i think there won't be a problem to find a hundred of >volunteers. >say no more. OH look! Max has got a willie! Way to go, Max. You are a truly Israeli male. -- ---OFCNL This is MY list. This list belongs to ME! I will flame anyone I want. Officia

Re: Payed Linux installers wanted

2002-12-04 Thread Shachar Shemesh
Max K. wrote: if it's a she, i think there won't be a problem to find a hundred of volunteers. say no more. I seriously considered masking the fact that it's a "she" to prevent precisely these kind of remarks. I think we had enough bad taste and self humiliation the last time this subject

Re: Payed Linux installers wanted

2002-12-04 Thread Max K.
On Tue, 3 Dec 2002, Shachar Shemesh wrote: > Hi all, > > During last Linux instaparty, one of the (only) people who came took the > RedHat 8.0 CDs, but did not have a computer ready. She asked whether we if it's a she, i think there won't be a problem to find a hundred of volunteers. say no more.