RE: Kword not ready for [Hebrew] prime time yet

2002-11-21 Thread Tzafrir Cohen
On Thu, 21 Nov 2002, Martin Polley wrote: > > -Original Message- > > From: Arie Folger [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] > > Sent: Thursday, November 21, 2002 4:42 PM > > To: MartinPolley; Ely Levy; [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > Subject: Re: Kword not ready for [Hebrew] prime time yet > > > > > > On Thur

Re: Kword not ready for [Hebrew] prime time yet

2002-11-21 Thread Oleg Kobets
Ahh, I remember the time I surfed BBS's with 2400bps modem. When I managed to d/l a 100kb text file I danced with joy :-))) Today, if I don't get at least 50kbs I get pissed off. Go figure :) - Original Message - From: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: "Linux-IL mailing list" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Cc

Re: Kword not ready for [Hebrew] prime time yet

2002-11-21 Thread afolger
Quoting Arie Folger <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>: > I'll wait for kde 3.1 and see (man, that's gonna be some download. > It's the first time I'll have to do it over 5k line :-(.) I obviously meant a 56k line. Nobody but museum curators use 5k anymore, if it ever existed (1200bps, anyone ;-)) Arie =

Re: PPtP problem

2002-11-21 Thread Baruch Even
First thing to check is if you added a routing entry for the internal network. PPTP by default only adds a route to the internal ip of the pptp gateway, that is if the pptp server gives you a 192.168.1.2 and it has a 192.168.1.1, there will be only a route to 192.168.1.1, you need to add a route o

Re: Kword not ready for [Hebrew] prime time yet

2002-11-21 Thread Arie Folger
On Thursday 21 November 2002 03:32, you wrote: > > Should I forward this to some kde developer? (Lars ... what's his email?) > He's actually on this list ;-) > Comments to some of your points (I have no idea about the others): > > 1* can produce ps > 2* ps has embedded fonts > > Both should work.

PPtP problem

2002-11-21 Thread Michael Sternberg
I have problem using Win2K VPN server from Linux. I success to connect to it, to receive an IP address in remote network, but when I try to ping something inside intranet I fail. I even can not ping other side of PPtP link. When I replace my default gateway with second side of link - PPtP connect

Re: Kword not ready for [Hebrew] prime time yet

2002-11-21 Thread Arie Folger
On Thursday 21 November 2002 09:53, Martin Polley wrote: > It depends on the font. If it is a font that is already available to X > apps AND to gs, no problem. > > If it is available to X and NOT to gs, then you need to make it > available to gs. > Arie Folger [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] > > Why no

RE: Kword not ready for [Hebrew] prime time yet

2002-11-21 Thread Martin Polley
It depends on the font. If it is a font that is already available to X apps AND to gs, no problem. If it is available to X and NOT to gs, then you need to make it available to gs. (I tried printing a Hebrew Word doc that I opened in KWord (font--Times), and all the Hebrew came out as boxes.) Th

Re: Kword not ready for [Hebrew] prime time yet

2002-11-21 Thread Arie Folger
On Thursday 21 November 2002 01:50, Martin Polley wrote: > It does #2 and #5 as well. Just enabling font embedding is not > enough--you have to make the Hebrew fonts available to GhostScript. Why not, ghostscript has no problem printing Hebrew coming from konqueror or lyx, after all? Arie =

Re: Samba and hebrew file name

2002-11-21 Thread Yedidyah Bar-David
On Thu, Nov 21, 2002 at 01:01:37PM +0200, Ben-Nes Michael wrote: > >Hi All > > > >Is there a way that samba will store a Hebrew file name that will be >accessible using direct access ( with correct name ), I mean not >through the smbmount ? I think samba 3 will support

yesterday's panel

2002-11-21 Thread Assaf Flatto
Any body attended the panel in Dan panorama yesterday ? what happened ? = Assaf Flatto --- This e-mail message may contain confidential, commercial and pr

Samba and hebrew file name

2002-11-21 Thread Ben-Nes Michael
Hi All   Is there a way that samba will store a Hebrew file name that will be accessible using direct access ( with correct name ), I mean not through the smbmount ?   Cheers

Re: Problem with process accounting

2002-11-21 Thread Oron Peled
On 20 Nov 2002 13:46:02 +0200 Gilad Ben-Yossef <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > On Wed, 2002-11-20 at 10:59, Michael Sternberg wrote: > > ... > > in "cmdline" there is a '\0' in place of last slash !! > ... > In short - it's the application (or whatever spawned it) fault. This "reflection" of argv[0]