On 22 Jul 2002, Gilad Ben-Yossef wrote:
> As for the 'Linux Lost' hugwash, I see where all my Windows-centric
> *programers* friends ended up working (if at all) and I see where I and
> other Linux people work and I know that *we* have won and will continue
> to win. All the rest is just interti
I am looking for an old SVGA adapter to grab 2 of its memory chips.
I believe I am looking for chips that were popular on the latest
generation of {ISA,VLB} display adapters or early generations of PCI
display adapters. This imply that if you have such an adapter there is
some probability th
On Tue, 2002-07-23 at 06:09, Alex Chudnovsky wrote:
> What they aren't right in, IMHO, is that such 13 y.o teenagers should get some
> life on their vacation instead of spending 18(sic!) hours a day at a computer
> - actually becoming computeroholics.
Oh, right, they should play some more footb
Eliran <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>
> Some windows users (that I know) *don't* know how to install the OS.
> If we want these kind of users to use linux, we at least should make the
> installation easier.
>
For the record, me and another member of this list were paid for aprox.
3 years for bu
On Monday 22 July 2002 12:13, Eliran wrote:
> http://www.ynet.co.il/articles/0,7340,L-2014694,00.html
>
> What is happening with Ynet ? once they use the term 'cracker'
> and another they use 'hacker'...
Maybe, but just maybe, the reason is two different journalists having two
different opinions?
Eliran wrote:
>Quake 1-3 and Unreal works there even better than on win machines, games are
>available to purchase from locki.
>
sorry to point the obvious here, but loki went down in a mantle of flames
(have I gotten my mythologies mixed up ? o:-) )
so no, there are no serious new games for l
On Mon, Jul 22, 2002 at 05:51:15PM +0200, Eliran wrote:
> About the games it's depend about what kind of games... Graphic games such
> as
> Quake 1-3 and Unreal works there even better than on win machines, games are
> available to purchase from locki.
Ehem, Loki's dead, has been for quite some t
http://www.ynet.co.il/articles/0,7340,L-2014694,00.html
What is happening with Ynet ? once they use the term 'cracker'
and another they use 'hacker'...
--
http://www.rootshell.be/~eg";>Eliran G.
=
To unsubscribe, send mail to [EMA
Title: RE: Desktop Linux -- Linux lost
Not quality, it's the usage of the power of the
video card.
--Eliran'>http://www.rootshell.be/~eg">Eliran
G.
- Original Message -
From:
Michael
Sternberg
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Monday, July 22, 2002 6:15 PM
Subject: RE:
Title: RE: Desktop Linux -- Linux lost
You can not compare seriously quantity and quality of games on Windows and Linux.
And this is major use of computer at the most family homes... :(
-- -Original Message-
-- From: Eliran [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
-- Sent: Monday, July 22, 200
Of course there are some exceptions, not all users care about the
installation or reading/writing
documents. But most do care.
About the games it's depend about what kind of games... Graphic games such
as
Quake 1-3 and Unreal works there even better than on win machines, games are
available to pu
My whole point is that installations as a general thing should be "easy" to
use, especially OS's
installations... Unless you want only gurus and techies to use the OS...
Currently I'm trying to help a newbie to install linux but he gets errors in
the installation,
that's what he get :
hda:hewelt
Eliran <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> Some windows users (that I know) *don't* know how to install the OS.
> If we want these kind of users to use linux, we at least should make the
> installation easier.
True story:
Yesterday night an acquaintance asked me to help her with her
computer. She was
On Mon, 22 Jul 2002, Eliran wrote:
>
> > A computer is a complecated system. When something is broken in your house
> > you can either fix it yourself (if you know how), ask a friend to fix it
> > for you, or call a shiputznik.
> >
> > Quite the same with computers.
>
> But installations *should*
> A computer is a complecated system. When something is broken in your house
> you can either fix it yourself (if you know how), ask a friend to fix it
> for you, or call a shiputznik.
>
> Quite the same with computers.
But installations *should* be a basic and easy to use thing, at least that
w
I meant that installation should be much more user-friendly so that a
general user
will be able to install it alone.
--
http://www.rootshell.be/~eg";>Eliran G.
- Original Message -
From: "Orna Agmon" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: "Eliran" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Cc: "Tzafrir Cohen" <[EMAIL PROTECTE
On Mon, 22 Jul 2002, Omer Zak wrote:
> Why then there is such a thing as "uninterruptible sleep" in Unix/Linux?
> What useful purpose (besides full Posix conformance) does this serve?
cause in some situations, you cannot afford to be interrupted. for
example, when you have a mutex you own, and
On Mon, Jul 22, 2002, Omer Zak wrote about "Why do we need uninterruptible sleep?
(was: Re: killing "uninterruptible sleep" process)":
> Why then there is such a thing as "uninterruptible sleep" in Unix/Linux?
> What useful purpose (besides full Posix conformance) does this serve?
As far as I kn
Why then there is such a thing as "uninterruptible sleep" in Unix/Linux?
What useful purpose (besides full Posix conformance) does this serve?
On Mon, 22 Jul 2002, guy keren wrote:
>
> On Mon, 22 Jul 2002, Sagi Bashari wrote:
[... snipped ...]
> >
> > Their parent- pid 1532 is already dead.
> >
On Mon, 22 Jul 2002, Sagi Bashari wrote:
> I logged in to one of my servers today and noticed that the load average is
> very high. After investigating the problem I found two processes in "D" stat
> ("uninterruptible sleep"):
>
> root 24344 0.0 0.2 1532 584 ?DN Jul21 0:01
> /u
Hi
I logged in to one of my servers today and noticed that the load average is
very high. After investigating the problem I found two processes in "D" stat
("uninterruptible sleep"):
root 24344 0.0 0.2 1532 584 ?DN Jul21 0:01
/usr/bin/updatedb -f NFS,SMBFS,NCPFS,PROC,DEVPTS -
21 matches
Mail list logo
