Re: bad Hebrew encoding [was: Re: M$ $oftware audit pushes schoolstoward Linux]

2002-05-11 Thread Tzafrir Cohen
Hi On Sat, 11 May 2002, Daniel Feiglin wrote: > > > Tzafrir Cohen wrote: > > On Sat, 11 May 2002, Daniel Feiglin wrote: > > > > > >>The central paragraph is beautifully worded: > >> > >>? , ??? ?? ? ??? ??? > >>?"? ? ? ?

Re: upgrading RH7.2 --> RH7.3

2002-05-11 Thread Nadav Har'El
On Sat, May 11, 2002, Yedidyah Bar-David wrote about "Re: upgrading RH7.2 --> RH7.3": > In that case, Dan, it should be trivial to "fake" a floppy+ISOs approach > by adding a suitable entry to grub (or lilo), something like > > title Upgrade to 7.3 > kernel > initrd > > Note, I did

Re: bad Hebrew encoding [was: Re: M$ $oftware audit pushes schoolstoward Linux]

2002-05-11 Thread Daniel Feiglin
Tzafrir Cohen wrote: > On Sat, 11 May 2002, Daniel Feiglin wrote: > > >>The central paragraph is beautifully worded: >> >>? , ??? ?? ? ??? ??? >>?"? ? ? ? ?? ??? > > > you, questions marks. The non-a

Re: M$ $oftware audit pushes schools toward Linux

2002-05-11 Thread Daniel Feiglin
Oy, vay! It seems that the Hebrew didn't come out too well. I used Mozilla 1.0RC mail client, with the KDE language setting, on Hebrew. What it says, is: "From information that has come to our attention, there is suspicion ("oleh chashad") that in your organisation, there is inconsistency ("ch

bad Hebrew encoding [was: Re: M$ $oftware audit pushes schools towardLinux]

2002-05-11 Thread Tzafrir Cohen
On Sat, 11 May 2002, Daniel Feiglin wrote: > The central paragraph is beautifully worded: > > ? , ??? ?? ? ??? ??? > ?"? ? ? ? ?? ??? you, questions marks. The non-ascii characters were converted to ques

Re: M$ $oftware audit pushes schools toward Linux

2002-05-11 Thread Daniel Feiglin
Same for us, I hope. Have you seen the disgustingly worded letter MS is sending to anybody and everybody here? It's from someone by the name of Gil Mey-Tal, cc: MS Ron Gazit Lawyer, and FUD at its worst. The central paragraph is beautifully worded: ? , ??? ?? ??

Re: upgrading RH7.2 --> RH7.3

2002-05-11 Thread Yedidyah Bar-David
Hi, On Fri, May 10, 2002 at 12:16:48AM +0300, Eran Tromer wrote: > Whatever you do, *don't* do what I did, which is burning the first ISO, > booting from it and hoping that the installer would be willing to read > the rest of the ISOs from disk (it isn't, and my box was stuck in > mid-install

Re: Expect Programmers

2002-05-11 Thread Eliran
On Wed, May 08, 2002 at 06:39:02PM +0300, Nadav Har'El wrote: > On Wed, May 08, 2002, Ehud Karni wrote about "Re: Expect Programmers": > > On Wed, 8 May 2002 01:11:15 +0300, Nadav Har'El <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > About 10 years ago, before easy-to-use tools like wget existed, I wrote > > >

wu-imapd mailbox

2002-05-11 Thread Tzafrir Cohen
Hi Im running a mail server that serves mail on a local LAN. most users read mail through POP3, some users read mail through IMAP, and very few shell users. I currently use a rather standard installation of wu-imapd (2001a) with a couple of small local modifications. The main problem of this i

Re: Compiling a single kernel module

2002-05-11 Thread Dan Aloni
On Fri, May 10, 2002 at 10:09:09PM +0300, Amir Sela wrote: > Hey list. > Is there a way, to compile a single module out of the kernel source > tree, without fiddling about manually with the Makefiles and such ? > I wanted to compile ntfs.c(as a loadable module, of course), and I'm > not very wel

Re: Compiling a single kernel module

2002-05-11 Thread Dan Aloni
On Fri, May 10, 2002 at 10:09:09PM +0300, Amir Sela wrote: > Is there a way, to compile a single module out of the kernel source > tree, without fiddling about manually with the Makefiles and such ? > I wanted to compile ntfs.c(as a loadable module, of course), and I'm > not very well versed in

Re: 3com 3c905cx "unknown device"

2002-05-11 Thread Muli Ben-Yehuda
On Sat, May 11, 2002 at 10:33:14AM +0300, Shachar Shemesh wrote: > Muli Ben-Yehuda wrote: > > > The word-wide EEPROM checksum is . > >Saved EEPROM settings of a 3Com Vortex/Boomerang: > > 3Com Node Address FF:FF:FF:FF:FF:FF (used as a unique ID only). > > OEM Station address ff:FF:FF:FF:FF:FF

Re: 3com 3c905cx "unknown device"

2002-05-11 Thread Shaul Karl
> Salutations, linux-il. > > I have a new 3com PCI NIC, which claims it is a "3c905cx", but lspci > with the latest pci.ids file gives: > > 00:09.0 Ethernet controller: 3Com Corporation: Unknown device (rev 78) > Flags: bus master, medium devsel, latency 64, IRQ 11 > I/O ports a

Re: 3com 3c905cx "unknown device"

2002-05-11 Thread Shachar Shemesh
Muli Ben-Yehuda wrote: > The word-wide EEPROM checksum is . >Saved EEPROM settings of a 3Com Vortex/Boomerang: > 3Com Node Address FF:FF:FF:FF:FF:FF (used as a unique ID only). > OEM Station address ff:FF:FF:FF:FF:FF (used as the ethernet address). > Device ID , Manufacturer ID . >

3com 3c905cx "unknown device"

2002-05-11 Thread Muli Ben-Yehuda
Salutations, linux-il. I have a new 3com PCI NIC, which claims it is a "3c905cx", but lspci with the latest pci.ids file gives: 00:09.0 Ethernet controller: 3Com Corporation: Unknown device (rev 78) Flags: bus master, medium devsel, latency 64, IRQ 11 I/O ports at 6500 [size=128