Omer Zak wrote:
> Will it be OK to plug one's pet Web site in one's Signature (in an
> otherwise on-topic, interesting and relevant message)?
>
> --- Omer
> This one is my shameful plug: http://www.zak.co.il/
> WARNING TO SPAMMERS: at http://www.zak
On Thu, 11 Apr 2002, Dvir Volk wrote:
> > I liked the zillion packages. You see, sometimes I jsut want
> > one component,
> > not the entire warehouse.
>
> I didn't say that there shouldn't be seperate packages, of course that
> IS GOOD.
> but you i would also like to see a bundled package withal
On Wednesday 10 April 2002 18:43, Dvir Volk wrote:
> I didn't say that there shouldn't be seperate packages, of course that
> IS GOOD.
> but you i would also like to see a bundled package with all the
> necessary files and libs inside.
agreed. Linux is among others about choice.
> maybe there sh
> I liked the zillion packages. You see, sometimes I jsut want
> one component,
> not the entire warehouse.
I didn't say that there shouldn't be seperate packages, of course that
IS GOOD.
but you i would also like to see a bundled package with all the
necessary files and libs inside.
i mean,
On Wed, Apr 10, 2002, Dvir Volk wrote about "RE: KDE 3.0 Instelation":
> which kinda makes you wonder: why isn't there just one big package for
> each distro, with all the needed dependecies (qt, libxml, openssh and
> such), and seperate packages for the "extra" stuff such as devel
> packages, kof
Is CUPS indispensable for KDE to work? I didn't install any printers under
CUPS, and wanted to force it to uninstall, but then I tried to print a PDF
doc that had lots of tables in it (a bunch of forms) and got an error message
from kghostview about something not being implemented for printing
On Wednesday 10 April 2002 15:19, you wrote:
> which kinda makes you wonder: why isn't there just one big package for
> each distro, with all the needed dependecies (qt, libxml, openssh and
> such), and seperate packages for the "extra" stuff such as devel
> packages, koffice and maybe kdevelop?
>
At 22:40 +0300 on 10/4/2002, Yehuda Drori wrote:
> other then that if you don't want to be
> directed to our site just don't press on the link to go there. you don't have
> a gun pointed to your head !! I personally think you missed that all IDEA but
> this is up to you and not for me to say
On Wed, 10 Apr 2002, Dvir Volk wrote:
> which kinda makes you wonder: why isn't there just one big package for
> each distro, with all the needed dependecies (qt, libxml, openssh and
> such), and seperate packages for the "extra" stuff such as devel
> packages, koffice and maybe kdevelop?
>
> i m
On Tuesday 09 April 2002 21:37, Yehuda Drori wrote:
hello to all of you co-responders
I would like to thank you for your time writing down your points of view.
I when I wrote that review I did it out of pure dedication for the future of
open source. I must first admit that I didn't write any pr
GB>> 4. To assume that we should somehow benefit from "central planning" is
GB>> to assume that there is someone, or even a group of people, who knows
GB>> what's best. This is in some way the premise behind "commercial"
Not exactly. It's assuming that some people have more manager talents than
o
which kinda makes you wonder: why isn't there just one big package for
each distro, with all the needed dependecies (qt, libxml, openssh and
such), and seperate packages for the "extra" stuff such as devel
packages, koffice and maybe kdevelop?
i mean, most people install it lock, stock and libs -
I didnt left the ^, probobly it was coment out using the copy paste
--
Canaan Surfing Ltd.
Internet Service Providers
Ben-Nes Michael - Manager
Tel: 972-4-6991122
http://sites.canaan.co.il
--
- Original Message -
From: "Tzafrir Cohen" <[EMAI
On Wed, 10 Apr 2002, Tzafrir Cohen wrote:
> Except ...
Except nothing. Everything worked.
> RPM's dependencies should have verified such silly stuff for you, right?
Sure, but I used --nodeps
--Ariel
--
Ariel Biener
e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
PGP(6.5.8) public key http://www.tau.ac.il/~ariel/p
On Wed, 10 Apr 2002, Ariel Biener wrote:
> I just did:
>
> cd /usr/local/src
> mkdir kde3
> cd kde3
> ftp ftp.sunet.se
> login as anonymous
> cd "/pub/kde/stable/latest/Red Hat/i386"
> bin
> prompt
> mget *.rpm
> quit
>
> then, rpm -Uvh --nodeps --force *.rpm
Just out of curiosity: what happens
Hi,
Someone earlier said --force implies --nodeps. That is wrong.
--Ariel
--
Ariel Biener
e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
PGP(6.5.8) public key http://www.tau.ac.il/~ariel/pgp.html
=
To unsubscribe, send mail to [EMAIL PROTEC
On Wed, 10 Apr 2002, Herouth Maoz wrote:
> In the mailing lists that I manage myself, I have a rule: no plugging
> your own website (maybe not even plugging your own article in
> somebody else's website). The exceptions are very few. This way, we
> know people will share *interesting* informatio
On Wed, 10 Apr 2002, Ben-Nes Michael wrote:
I just did:
cd /usr/local/src
mkdir kde3
cd kde3
ftp ftp.sunet.se
login as anonymous
cd "/pub/kde/stable/latest/Red Hat/i386"
bin
prompt
mget *.rpm
quit
then, rpm -Uvh --nodeps --force *.rpm
After that, worked like a charm. Make sure you have openss
On Wed, 10 Apr 2002, Hetz Ben Hamo wrote:
> rpm -e `rpm -qa | grep kde` --nodeps
You left out the '^'
> rpm -Uvh *rpm --nodeps --force...
>
> worked perfect here ;)
'rm -rf /' will work fine next time you try it givenm you are root)
What if you have a package called 'hookdesktop' ? It will be
> On Wed, Apr 10, 2002, Ben-Nes Michael wrote about "KDE 3.0 Instelation":
> > I fallowed KDE instruction of how to install the new KDE and obviously
it
> > didn't work.
> > all the dependencies are ruined and now I need to guess what lib belong
to
> > what package.
> >
> > I think its shame that
rpm -e `rpm -qa | grep kde` --nodeps
rpm -Uvh *rpm --nodeps --force...
worked perfect here ;)
Hetz
On Wednesday 10 April 2002 03:08 pm, Ben-Nes Michael wrote:
> Damn
>
> I fallowed KDE instruction of how to install the new KDE and obviously it
> didn't work.
> all the dependencies are ruined an
At 21:37 +0300 on 9/4/2002, Yehuda Drori wrote:
> I've written a review where I spill my gut about it at:
>
> http://whatsup.org.il/modules.php?name=Reviews&rop=showcontent&id=7
>
> and I would like you to response to that..
I am starting to agree with Gilad Ben-Yossef (in the thread "Linu
On Wed, Apr 10, 2002, Ben-Nes Michael wrote about "KDE 3.0 Instelation":
> I fallowed KDE instruction of how to install the new KDE and obviously it
> didn't work.
> all the dependencies are ruined and now I need to guess what lib belong to
> what package.
>
> I think its shame that they put such
Damn
I fallowed KDE instruction of how to install the new KDE and obviously it
didn't work.
all the dependencies are ruined and now I need to guess what lib belong to
what package.
I think its shame that they put such instruction that don't work :(
Here is a snip ->
-
On Wed, Apr 10, 2002 at 09:36:03AM +0200, Shai Bentin wrote:
> I've read what you all have written. I tend to agree with all of
> you.
First of all, please print out and read at least three times Gilad's
post. He makes the point with eloquence unmatched. Nontheless, I shall
now respond verbatim
On Tue, 2002-04-09 at 21:37, Yehuda Drori wrote:
> hi...
>
> I would like to raise a point about OPEN SOURCE..
> I think there are a lot of human resources getting wasted with OPEN SOURCE
> projects.
>
> I've written a review where I spill my gut about it at:
>
> http://whatsup.org.il/modules
Hi all,
Though I am an enthusiast on Linux (I am using RH 7.2) I wasnt able to
fully become a Linux desktop user.
The solution I fond was to use an X server on my Win2000 (I use Exceed
6.2), work with XDMCP, and get both Linux and Windows desktops.
Since my main desktop is the Win
27 matches
Mail list logo
