On Tue, 15 Jan 2002, Hetz Ben Hamo wrote:
> > I'm rather confused at the moment. Does this kernel contain the new
> > Virtual Memory manager from Andrea Archangeli or does it use the
> > original VM that was present in the older 2.4.x releases?
>
> The new one. Old one is deprecated officially (l
> I'm rather confused at the moment. Does this kernel contain the new
> Virtual Memory manager from Andrea Archangeli or does it use the
> original VM that was present in the older 2.4.x releases?
The new one. Old one is deprecated officially (look at Redhat's Rawhide
kernel - 2.4.16)
> I know
> i find your use of 2.4.18pre3-ac2 and 'stable' in the same sentance
> amusing, if a bit oxymoronic, since that kernel has been out for all of
> two days. maybe it does beautifully under stress, but what if it has a
> hidden bug that causes it to degrade over time, so that in a week it's
> unusab
On Tue, 15 Jan 2002, Hetz Ben Hamo wrote:
> Hi People,
>
> After much more stress tests with the new VM (36 hours tests and rapid emails
> swapping) I'm happy to announce:
>
> Kernel 2.4.17 + Marcello's pre3 + Alan Cox ac2 patch = kernel 2.4.18-pre3-ac2
> is the the most stable tests with the new
On Tue, 15 Jan 2002, Hetz Ben Hamo wrote:
> Kernel 2.4.17 + Marcello's pre3 + Alan Cox ac2 patch = kernel
> 2.4.18-pre3-ac2 is the the most stable tests with the new VM, after
> 12 hours of heavy stress testing (tests include: parallel compiling
> X + KDE + running OpenGL demos + live file system
Hi People,
After much more stress tests with the new VM (36 hours tests and rapid emails
swapping) I'm happy to announce:
Kernel 2.4.17 + Marcello's pre3 + Alan Cox ac2 patch = kernel 2.4.18-pre3-ac2
is the the most stable tests with the new VM, after 12 hours of heavy stress
testing (tests i
On Mon, 14 Jan 2002, Adi Stav wrote:
> On Mon, Jan 14, 2002 at 03:27:18PM +0200, Tzafrir Cohen wrote:
> > On 14 Jan 2002, Erez Doron wrote:
> >
> > > hi
> > >
> > > when i do 'ls -l' , i get the file modification time
> > > how do i get file creation time ?
>
> I don't think ls or any other tool
> Shaul,
> Har Tzion street near Central Bus Station in T.A. has a number of a
> small electronics shops which have everything you need, and at decent
> prices (comparing to computer shops). You may want to shop there before
> looking elsewhere.
>
> Haim.
I was hopping to have it cheaper. From
Hi,
On 14 Jan 2002, Erez Doron wrote:
> when i do 'ls -l' , i get the file modification time
> how do i get file creation time ?
In Linux, or in Unix in general, you can get all the information about a file
by the stat(2) function, and utilities like `ls' or `find' just use it. As you
can see f
Is it true to all FS or just the ext2,3 ?
--
Canaan Surfing Ltd.
Internet Service Providers
Ben-Nes Michael - Manager
Tel: 972-4-6991122
http://sites.canaan.co.il
--
- Original Message -
From: "Erez Doron" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: "ilug" <[EM
solved
there is no way to see creation time only change time (ctime) and access
time (atime)
the command is :
ls -l --time=ctime ( or --time=atime)
regards
erez.
On Mon, 2002-01-14 at 15:47, Oleg Goldshmidt wrote:
> Tzafrir Cohen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>
> > On 14 Jan 2002, Erez Doron w
Tzafrir Cohen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> On 14 Jan 2002, Erez Doron wrote:
> > when i do 'ls -l' , i get the file modification time
> > how do i get file creation time ?
> Try using 'find' instead of 'ls'. The option -printf is very
> powerful.
Can you elaborate? The find info pages say
On Mon, 14 Jan 2002, Itay Meiri wrote:
> Hi,
>
> Any one knows how to cause automake to use
> GNU ld instead of 'ar'?
> I replaced AC_PROG_RANLIB with AC_PROG_LIBTOOL
> and changed all LIBRARIES primaries to LTLIBRARIES as
> well as calling ./configure with --with-gnu-ld. Nothing worked.
What ex
On 14 Jan 2002, Erez Doron wrote:
> hi
>
> when i do 'ls -l' , i get the file modification time
> how do i get file creation time ?
Try using 'find' instead of 'ls'. The option -printf is very powerful.
I'm not sure, though, how to list only the files in the current directory,
and not in subdir
Hi
I only recently started using kernel 2.4, and only this morning bothered
to find out what is this strange "kapm-idled" process that takes so much
of my CPU time. Finding this was a mere google search for "kapm-idled",
but anyway, I thought that this should appear in the FAQ:
http://www.iglu.o
hi
when i do 'ls -l' , i get the file modification time
how do i get file creation time ?
regards
erez.
=
To unsubscribe, send mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with
the word "unsubscribe" in the message body, e.g., run the command
echo u
Hi,
Any one knows how to cause automake to use
GNU ld instead of 'ar'?
I replaced AC_PROG_RANLIB with AC_PROG_LIBTOOL
and changed all LIBRARIES primaries to LTLIBRARIES as
well as calling ./configure with --with-gnu-ld. Nothing worked.
?
-
in my experience, TED reads English RTF,
cheers, avraham
>>> [EMAIL PROTECTED] 01/14/02 10:32am >>>
Tzafrir Cohen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> What about RTF?
Let me repeat my question: what tools can read/write RTF (English)
under Linux? StarOffice does, and KWord doesn't, AFAIK. Anything *bu
Ira Abramov <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> now search freshmeat for more :)
I wonder if this is worthwhile. You gave a rather long list of tools
that don't do what I asked. Given that latex2rtf and rtf2latex don't
work at all (last time I checked - a few months ago - their
documentation even warn
On 14 Jan 2002, Oleg Goldshmidt wrote:
> > What about RTF?
>
> Let me repeat my question: what tools can read/write RTF (English)
> under Linux? StarOffice does, and KWord doesn't, AFAIK. Anything *but*
> SO?
looks like more things convert to rather than from, but here's a short
list I got you w
Tzafrir Cohen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> What about RTF?
Let me repeat my question: what tools can read/write RTF (English)
under Linux? StarOffice does, and KWord doesn't, AFAIK. Anything *but*
SO?
--
Oleg Goldshmidt | [EMAIL PROTECTED]
"If it ain't broken, it has not got enough features
21 matches
Mail list logo
