Which server/client do you except linux ?
- Original Message -
From: "Alon Altman" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: "Linux-IL" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Friday, November 23, 2001 6:58 AM
Subject: NFSS and time problem
> Hi,
> I have two problems in my home network, and I'm not sure if they're
r
Hi,
I have two problems in my home network, and I'm not sure if they're related.
I have a client PC which mounts /home as an NFS share on the server. Once in
a while, all access to the mounted directory is stalled and the following
data is transferred on the network:
06:45:23.270071 192.168.1.2
At the past The IBM BiDi team was looking for testers.
Should I report minor problems about Mozilla and Hebrew sites?
By minor I mean something like a column that is justified to the left
rather then to the right, or a list of Hebrew items which looks like
OneTwoThree (i.e it is readable but l
On Fri, Nov 23, 2001 at 01:21:24AM +0200, Hetz Ben Hamo wrote:
> Don't u mean 0.9.6? it's out since 2 days now (0.9.6 I mean)
Give the maintainer some time. Besides, a package can't enter testing
following two days of its initial upload to unstable.
Regards, Yotam Rubin
>
> On Friday 2
In case this was not already taken care of:
Can it be arranged that some copies of your book will be available to
look at, or maybe even to purchase?
For those who are not sure what book I am referring to,
http://www.iglu.org.il:8080/Control_Panel/Products/Squishdot/IGLU/1005584814/index_html
Don't u mean 0.9.6? it's out since 2 days now (0.9.6 I mean)
On Friday 23 November 2001 01:08 am, you wrote:
> In case there are other Debian users who still did not saw it, Debian
> woody (testing) now has Mozilla 0.9.5. This holds for the i386 version.
> Not sure what is going on for all the ot
In case there are other Debian users who still did not saw it, Debian
woody (testing) now has Mozilla 0.9.5. This holds for the i386 version.
Not sure what is going on for all the other platforms that Debian is,
at least partly, ported to.
And yes, as far as I know MDK/RH/other distros have a
Yedidyah Bar-David wrote:
> efence only causes buffer overruns to segv, nothing more.
>
> Eli - If you only looked at a leak detector - don't look at efence.
Thanks.
Just to CTBS: It's true that I was looking only for mem leaks detector;
However, during my tries to use njadm (New Just Anothe
I've had several bad experiences with tulip cards on kernel 2.2 (got most to
work, eventually, by downloading drivers and recompiling). I'm not sure what
the situation is with 2.4, but if my experience is any indication - then I
don't want to touch tulip cards ever. also - I wasn't impressed with
Hetz Ben Hamo wrote:
> You may want to contact rational,
>
> from what I know, they DO have some sort of beta test but they want some
> customers before they'll release it to market - that what I heard from
> someone there 2 months ago.
I had a feeling like this...
In the ads of IBM about the
> On Thu, Nov 22, 2001, Yedidyah Bar-David wrote about "Re: Mem Leak Tracer (monitored
>malloc)":
> > Hi
> >
> > I never used any of them, so I can't comment.
> >
> > For my needs, ElectricFence is good enough. It is tiny, I understand
> > perfectly how it works, and what I can expect from it.
Hetz Ben Hamo <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> Oh, and insure sucks, specially when it finds tons of other leaks,
> but not in your code, in the other libs code ;)
I didn't see that all that much, and when it happened it was simple
to make it shut up about the particular things.
One thing about In
Hi
On Thu, Nov 22, 2001 at 09:47:19PM +0200, Nadav Har'El wrote:
> On Thu, Nov 22, 2001, Yedidyah Bar-David wrote about "Re: Mem Leak Tracer (monitored
>malloc)":
> > Hi
> >
[snip]
>
> I thought the original poster was after a memory *leak* checker.
> According to efence's manual,
>
> "Elec
On 2001 November? 21 ,Wednesday 21:26, Hetz Ben Hamo wrote:
> Did u really expected Koffice 1.1 to replace MS Word? cause it ain't.
>
> http://koffice.kde.org/install-source.phtml - get the source from here and
> compile it - it worked here on Redhat 6.2 so I assume it can compile and
> work on th
On Thu, Nov 22, 2001, Hetz Ben Hamo wrote about "Re: Mem Leak Tracer (monitored
malloc)":
> Oh, and insure sucks, specially when it finds tons of other leaks, but not in
> your code, in the other libs code ;)
So what? If it tells you these leaks occur because of memory allocated in
another libr
On Thu, Nov 22, 2001, Omer Musaev wrote about "RE: Mem Leak Tracer (monitored malloc)":
> bugs in hellish efficiency. However, there is a catch.
>
> It is for WinNT( ++ ) or Solaris on SPARC only. period.
I remember using it on a VAX running Unix!
I guess Purify changed their platform focus sin
On Thu, Nov 22, 2001, Eli Marmor wrote about "Re: Mem Leak Tracer (monitored malloc)":
> I was not aware of memprof...
> Seems that my search in freshmeat, although it brought zillion results,
> was not full anough...
> I'll take a look at it!
If you're using RedHat (and perhaps other distributio
On Thu, Nov 22, 2001, Yedidyah Bar-David wrote about "Re: Mem Leak Tracer (monitored
malloc)":
> Hi
>
> I never used any of them, so I can't comment.
>
> For my needs, ElectricFence is good enough. It is tiny, I understand
> perfectly how it works, and what I can expect from it. Most others
> a
>From the day site:
"Cards that are Tulip compatible are not supported well on Linux and may not function;
these cards can be identified by a MX written on their Chip). "
This is complete and utter bullshit. Not only Tulip chip based cards work well with
Linux (and have been since 1.0.x), they
You may want to contact rational,
from what I know, they DO have some sort of beta test but they want some
customers before they'll release it to market - that what I heard from
someone there 2 months ago.
Oh, and insure sucks, specially when it finds tons of other leaks, but not in
your code
HI Linuxers!
A new version of the adsl-howto was just installed on the net. This
reflects the new pptp version just worked out by Mulix and merged in the
main pptp branch. Also some clarifications for DNS and the path MTU
discovery blackholing. We call for a *BSD user to contribute a detailed
sect
LINUX DAY -
INVITATION
You are welcome to participate in the Linux Day that will
take place on Monday 26/11/01 at Bar-Ilan University (10:00 – 18:00 near Agudat
Hastudentim building).
This year we are
hosting IBM, SUN and Comprise who will demonstrate, install,
and distribute thei
i have tried a lot of malloc debuggers and i can recommend dmalloc it's very
good for finding leaks and validate pointers , but if you want simple and
clear reporting try using memprof ( you can find it on freshmeat) it has a
very good gtk gui for reporting leaks and profiling , but unfortunal
Hi
I never used any of them, so I can't comment.
For my needs, ElectricFence is good enough. It is tiny, I understand
perfectly how it works, and what I can expect from it. Most others
are much bigger. The extreme is checker (package gccchecker in debian),
which puts some checks inside all memor
Eli Marmor <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> Does anybody have any experience with one or more of them?
> Any recommendations?
I have used dmalloc and ElectricFence. Both are very helpful.
> Tips?
In the past I found it very useful to compile with ParaSoft's Insure
during development. It flushes a
Hi,
We all love the plurality of choices in Linux/Open-Source.
However, it doesn't come without a price: The difficulty to choose a
package from so many "competing" packages.
I used freshmeat to search for a memory leak tracer.
In return, I got an infinite list of libraries, all claim to do wh
> Looks good, but if I decide to buy a product, I believe I'll put my
> money on Purify.
Purify is the best tool I had worked with. It works well on multithreaded
apps.
It does not touch your code ( opposing to Insure++ ). It is reliable and
points to
bugs in hellish efficiency. However, there
Thanks a lot, Shlomi/Yedidya/Vlad/Oleg (though others are still welcome
to contribute from their experience too...)
Mid-Summary:
Yedidyah Bar-David wrote:
> I never used any of them, so I can't comment.
>
> For my needs, ElectricFence is good enough. It is tiny, I understand
As I w
>
> some of my thought about performance.
> Is it really important ?
>
> Well in out little country I don't think so, lets imagine a
> site that get
> 5,000,000 ( big site in any meaning - a good site for my
> opinion get 100,000
> hits per month)
> 5,000,000 hits are equals to 2 queries per s
Hi Cedar,
The adsl is a very sturdy protocol considering what he has to do. The 5 times a day
disconnection could
be a not so good quality of your line. I had the same problem in the past, until i
called bezeq technitians a few times until they went all over the cables in my house
(and replaced
Hi!
It apears to be a disconnection on the link to Bezeq. If your ppp does not
use keepalive (this may be configured as an option) the ppp will not
identify link loss. The best is to run a background / cron process that
checks the connection and when it finds that it is dead, kills pppd and
reconn
> Date: Thu, 22 Nov 2001 01:20:16 +0200
> From: "Nadav Har'El" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> Subject: Re: ADSL problems (is it just me?)
>
> On Wed, Nov 21, 2001, Hetz Ben Hamo wrote about "ADSL problems (is it just me?)":
> > I don't know if its just me or this happends to anyone but in the last 2 days
Henry Ficher wrote:
>
> Hi all!
>
> I'm kinda baffled by this one:
>
> I use NetSaint to check hosts and routers in one of our networks. This
> network is somewhat complex, with several remote sites connected with
> the main office.
..
> I'm running kernel 2.4.14 on RedHat 7.2 and the rout
Hi all!
I'm kinda baffled by this one:
I use NetSaint to check hosts and routers in one of our networks. This
network is somewhat complex, with several remote sites connected with
the main office.
I'm running kernel 2.4.14 on RedHat 7.2 and the routing table looks like
this:
Kernel IP routi
Yes - performance is really important, in some cases - it all depends on
what you do with a hit.
On my P2-233 I have a database with some tables, two of those hold more then
800,000 records (each), and the others aren't all that far behind. several
PHP pages that are hit by almost anyone seeing th
some of my thought about performance.
Is it really important ?
Well in out little country I don't think so, lets imagine a site that get
5,000,000 ( big site in any meaning - a good site for my opinion get 100,000
hits per month)
5,000,000 hits are equals to 2 queries per second which is easy tas
i think that there is a little problem in solving
the "nezek" problem in our country. so yes, there's an
unknown number of incompetent tech supporters who work for
this company and "bend" under pressure of the clients,
and do give some kind of compensation for the nezek they provide.
but actually
El Sun, 18 Nov 2001 22:43:42 +0200, Yedidyah Bar-David
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> escribió:
> Hi
>
> I wish to remind everyone, that the current output from the part
> that reads the babylon file keeps the exact order of the chars
> in the file, which is what I can call "reverse visual", which is
> ide
El Sun, 18 Nov 2001 21:30:16 +0200 (IST), Tzafrir Cohen
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> escribió:
>[...]
> So basically neutral is the safest choice, but can cause unexpected
> results, in case the first word in the definition happens to be an
english
> one. In that case, you may add the character RLM (Right
39 matches
Mail list logo
