another idea .. trap or signal for awakening the child after its birth.
after forking - sleep until you send external intervention, in order to
begin execution and examination ... etc.
-=O0~~O0=-
"Beware the Jabberwock, my son!
The jaws that bite, the claws that catc
another problem with attaching to a child process can be:
until the process is born it has no PID ..
and to predict a PID may not be possible.
-=O0~~O0=-
"Beware the Jabberwock, my son!
The jaws that bite, the claws that catch!
Beware the Jubjub bird, and shun
The
>
> ddd is a graphic front end for gdb (and dbx and other debuggers).
> However, I haven't been able to redirect it to the child process,
> after a fork call. I need to redirect the debugger before the
> childs birth-- see the reason below .
> I've write "set follow fork-mode child" on the gdb pa
On Wed, 14 Nov 2001, Tzafrir Cohen wrote:
> On Wed, 14 Nov 2001, Uri Zalk wrote:
>
> > Hi, Dani and fellow linuxians :
>
> > (2) I run mainly RH 7.2 + one box RH 6.2 and another MDK 8.1. I had
> > problem viewing Hebrew sites.
>
> Support for logical Hebrew exists in mozilla sinceversion 0.9
ddd is a graphic front end for gdb (and dbx and other debuggers).
However, I haven't been able to redirect it to the child process,
after a fork call. I need to redirect the debugger before the
childs birth-- see the reason below .
I've write "set follow fork-mode child" on the gdb panel of ddd,
hello, linuxers,
if anyone wants to help test the new pptp patch against current cvs
pptp, you can grab it from http://www.pointer.co.il/~mulix/. there's
both a diff and a .tar.gz.
this patch has run time support for bezeq, instead of compile
time support like we used to have. it also appears to
On Wed, 14 Nov 2001, Uri Zalk wrote:
> Hi, Dani and fellow linuxians :
> (2) I run mainly RH 7.2 + one box RH 6.2 and another MDK 8.1. I had
> problem viewing Hebrew sites.
Support for logical Hebrew exists in mozilla sinceversion 0.9.1 Both RH7.2
and MDK8.1 have a version of mozilla that is
> Hi people,
>
> I'm trying to compile loop.o module inside my kernel, and I
> get this weird
> message - does someone knows about this anything?
>
> hetz]# modprobe loop
> /lib/modules/2.4.14/kernel/drivers/block/loop.o: unresolved symbol
> deactivate_page
> /lib/modules/2.4.14/kernel/drive
On Wed, 14 Nov 2001, Hetz Ben Hamo wrote:
> Hi people,
>
> I'm trying to compile loop.o module inside my kernel, and I get this weird
> message - does someone knows about this anything?
>
> hetz]# modprobe loop
> /lib/modules/2.4.14/kernel/drivers/block/loop.o: unresolved symbol
> deactivate_pag
Hi people,
I'm trying to compile loop.o module inside my kernel, and I get this weird
message - does someone knows about this anything?
hetz]# modprobe loop
/lib/modules/2.4.14/kernel/drivers/block/loop.o: unresolved symbol
deactivate_page
/lib/modules/2.4.14/kernel/drivers/block/loop.o: insm
attached is a revised patch for bezeq support, relative to current pptp
cvs. bezeq support is now a run time mechanism, via a
--quirks=BEZEQ_ISRAEL switch. for this, i implemented a general quirks
mechanism, which allows overriding the out_call_rqst packet
construction, start_ctrl_conn packet cons
Uri Zalk <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> (1) What do the NIS costs you mentioned translate to in US $ terms?
The "representative" NIS/USD FX rate (most widely used for USD-linked
transactions inside Israel) is 4.216 NIS per USD as of yesterday's
close. The actual rate may vary, but it should be go
Shaul,
They a model that is installed over ISDN lines, so you need not convert it
back to analog. In fact, the installation price for this version is only
199 NIS (while the regular is 299 NIS)..
but then you still being charged 80 NIS/month for the ISDN line ...
Dani
On Wed, 14 Nov 2001, Shaul K
Le 2001-11-13, Dani Arbel écrivait :
> with other ISPs using the same equipment. On the other hand, once
> implemented, the pptp is not fully compatible with the RFC . Maybe it
> would make sense to make a #define per ADSL modem that is bugy.
Yep, or some sort of 'quirk table' as is commonly fou
>
> With Alcatel modems, I found a bug in the unit for ISDN lines. The fix
> (refering to ver. 1.0.1 of pptp )is
> actualy trivial and will not make the code non rfc complient. I will see
> if it is at all neede for the current version.
>
What does ISDN has to do with ADSL?
I mean, as far as
15 matches
Mail list logo
