Looking for a Debian Maintainer for Freecell Solver

I am the main programmer of Freecell Solver, which is a library and an executable for automatic solving of boards of Freecell and similar Solitaire variants. Freecell Solver is already used by KDE's Solitaire suite - kpat - and it is expected that it will be used by PySol and by GNOME's AisleRiot

No Subject

this is a mail test, i will appreciate it if you all reply back had some dns problems Michael W Ray IT Manager * G-Connect - Helping ISPs to differentiate www.g-connect.com POB 2200, Herzlyia B, 46120, Israel < m

Re: IPSec on 2.4.2/IPv4

Well, not a perfect solution, but definitely one that should work - with ipsec performing as Tzafrir described, and using the the mangling table as Alex has Looks like I'm gonna kill my uptime to try and do this. Wish me luck :-) ---= Miki Shapiro =-- ---= Cell: (+972)-56-32

Re: bind 9.1

Hi, What do you mean "the record has disappeared" ? What are the relevant logs entries tell you ? (tell us) If you don't have requested that, you might not be able to see any logging, or only minor ones. put in your named.conf something like: logging { channel syslog_debug { syslog mail;

Re: Mandrake 2.4.4 kernel

On Sun, May 20, 2001 at 08:15:21PM +0300, Alex Shnitman wrote: > > > > 1. Much faster, thanks to a major optimization of the way fork-exec is > > >implemented. > > > > IIRC, that feature's effects on the scheduler were not considered properly, > > and you could get all kinds of undesired sc

Re: IPSec on 2.4.2/IPv4

Hi, Ilya! On Sun, May 20, 2001 at 02:15:07PM +0300, you wrote the following: > As far as I see, there's no way to change the destination route based > on the port (that is, according to man netfilter, there's no such > option). Actually it's quite easy to do if you combine netfilter and the pol

Re: Mandrake 2.4.4 kernel

I think the changes would be seen mostly in fast cards ir giga ones Ely Levy System group Hebrew University Jerusalem Israel On Sun, 20 May 2001, Alex Shnitman wrote: > > > > 1. Much faster, thanks to a major optimization of the way fork-exec is > > > implemented. > > > > IIRC, that featur

Re: Mandrake 2.4.4 kernel

> > 1. Much faster, thanks to a major optimization of the way fork-exec is > >implemented. > > IIRC, that feature's effects on the scheduler were not considered properly, > and you could get all kinds of undesired scheduling behavior under 2.4.3, > such as unresponsive processes and the li

bind 9.1

Title: Message Hi   I installed RH 7.1 with bind 9.1 which came with the cd, everything worked fine for 2 weeks, today I saw that I do not have any dens resolution at all.   at the named.conf file I saw that it did not even load the zone file, the record has disappeared !!   any one with a

Re: Hebrew on IGLU

On 20-May-2001 Tzafrir Cohen wrote: > On Sat, 19 May 2001 [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > >> I have what is probably a **silly** problem, but here it is. Although I have >> Hebrew fonts and can see Hebrew in both directions using Konqueror on sites >> like Walla, Ynet, Maariv, and many others, **DAVKA

Re: Q: Using GNU Autoconf/Automake with proprietary software projects

As written in the autoconf automake manuals they doesnt' require any special licence to be used they only encourage you to use GPL in general GPL programs doesn't automaticly GPL the files they make Ely Levy System group Hebrew University Jerusalem Israel On Sun, 20 May 2001, Shlomi Fish wro

Re: RAID 0 or LVM?

Hi, Im using RAID 0 in a UDMA disk with 4.5GB 7200RPM and we tested reading and writing 1GB file so here is the results (This test giving a results of 1 disk): For 512 byte blocks we get: Write (bytes/s): 5,520,807 Read: 9,625,655 CPU Load in %s: 26.1 and for 8192 byte (8kB) blocks we get: Write

Re: Re[2]: IPSec on 2.4.2/IPv4

Cool :-) Thx! ---= Miki Shapiro =-- ---= Cell: (+972)-56-322433 = ---= ICQ: 3EE853 =--- ---= Windows Programmer in Rehab =--- - "If at first you don't succeed... .. Skydiving is probbably not for you." On Sun,

Re[2]: IPSec on 2.4.2/IPv4

I also recommend read the FAQs of NetBSD and FreeBSD: http://www.netbsd.org/Documentation/network/ipsec/ http://www.r4k.net/ipsec/ They are a good FAQs that I recommend to read. I hope this will give you the answer. At 17:33 20/05/01 +0300, you wrote: >Are we *absolutely sure* we're not confusin

RAID 0 or LVM?

Hi, I just got a nice little 1U server for some testings here at work... It's a pretty nice machine for it's price (almost $2,000) - 2X866Mhz PIII, 2X75GB UDMA hard drives (IBM, 7200RPM), 512MB PC-133 SDRAM, cdrom, floppy, Promise IDE controller, 2 64-bit PCI slots, and lots of fans... I was

Re: IPSec on 2.4.2/IPv4

Hi, I recommend you read the IETF's comprehensive list of papers in: http://www.ietf.org/ids.by.wg/ipsec.html maybe you will find there your answer and read the RFCs and surely you will find the answer. At 17:33 20/05/01 +0300, you wrote: >Are we *absolutely sure* we're not confusing >(1) IP-lay

Re: Linux mail relay + MS Exchange

Evgeny Popov wrote: > No. I keep a single account in Linux, which recieves all the mail > for domain, and Popbeamer ( > http://www.dataenter.co.at/products/popbeamer.htm , 129$) or similar Windows > product can routes them to my Exchange users using POP3. Do you mean you use a "multi-dro

Re: IPSec on 2.4.2/IPv4

Are we *absolutely sure* we're not confusing (1) IP-layer encryption (that may.. I hope still.. exist in upcoming OS implementations) with (2) tunneling software (or a tunneling kernel driver) that implements a simple "tunnel-over-network-interface" to abide with existing interface/routing mecha

Re: IPSec on 2.4.2/IPv4

On Sun, May 20, 2001 at 04:35:23PM +0300, Miki Shapiro wrote: > I seemed to have an idea (or possibly a misconception) that IPSec talked > about generic enctyption on the IP layer I thought so too, when I first heard about the term, but now I'm not too sure. Guys, correct me if I'm wrong. > more

Re: IPSec on 2.4.2/IPv4

On Sun, 20 May 2001, Ilya Konstantinov wrote: > Yet again, I'm not sure it's possible to establish IPSec connections to > any accepting host around the world without preconfiguring it. I seemed to have an idea (or possibly a misconception) that IPSec talked about generic enctyption on the IP lay

RE: Linux mail relay + MS Exchange

> How is that more secure? > > This is more secure, because you don't need to allow any connection from DMZ to your LAN. If you forward all the mail from DMZ to your LAN by SMTP, you have to allow incoming SMTP connection from Mail Relay to Exchange that recides in LAN, which is potenti

Re(2): Linux mail relay + MS Exchange

Or I just didnt understand the question. I mean using the in.pop3d with sendmail/postfix and then receive the mail in MS. If you will use in.pop3d and you will enable it from inetd the 110 port will open and then you will be able to receive the mail from MS. At 13:53 20/05/01 +0200, you wrote:

Re: IPSec on 2.4.2/IPv4

On Sun, May 20, 2001 at 02:52:50PM +0300, Miki Shapiro wrote: > Can I ask my linux box (with this kernel patch) to only use IPSec for > communication on pre-designated TCP ports? (and have other services such > as DNS and SMTP go on working without using IPSec?) As far as I see, there's no way to

Re: Linux mail relay + MS Exchange

why not using pop3d to get mail from MS? At 12:57 20/05/01 +0300, you wrote: >On Sun, 20 May 2001 10:54:46 +0200, Evgeny Popov <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > > That what my company is going to implement in growing amounts at client > > sites. > > > > If anyone can share his experience, especial

Re: IPSec on 2.4.2/IPv4

On Sun, 20 May 2001, Ilya Konstantinov wrote: > AFAIK, there isn't such thing as "suggesting". Win2K allows you, if you're the client, to "ask" the server to use IPSec, yet fall back to not using it if it refuses. Alternatively, if you're a paranoid sysadmin with suicidal tendencies and a polic

Re: Q: Using GNU Autoconf/Automake with proprietary software projects

Well, as long as you don't change any of the autoconf tools - I don't see a reason why can't you.. Of course - before everyone flames me - I'll give few examples of applications that uses just the same way with gcc which is also, under GPL.. 1. Nvidia binary only drivers (compiled with GCC at

Re: IPSec on 2.4.2/IPv4

On Sun, May 20, 2001 at 12:59:43PM +0300, Miki Shapiro wrote: > Another Q: > > I want my box to suggest (yet not require) IPSec over my IPv4 connection, > especially for incoming sessions. AFAIK, there isn't such thing as "suggesting". Using IPSec is basically establishing a VPN tunnel with you

Re: need powerful linux news client

Hi, Well, I can recommend you what I use - a very small and efficient text client called "brag" - search it on freshmeat.net it's a small application where you put all your arguments in 1 line. Hetz On Sunday 20 May 2001 11:26, Miki Shapiro wrote: > Hi all > > 1. Thx Eli/Ilya for answer on ba

Re: IPSec on 2.4.2/IPv4

Following some reading-up on www.kerneli.org - anyone know when 2.4.x will see crypto-inside in its out-of-the-box sources? thx. ---= Miki Shapiro =-- ---= Cell: (+972)-56-322433 = ---= ICQ: 3EE853 =--- ---= Windows Programmer in Rehab =--- --

Q: Using GNU Autoconf/Automake with proprietary software projects

As you may well know, GNU Autoconf and Automake are distributed under the GPL, which means that all the autoconf m4 macros and Bournme shell source code is also GPLed. At least from what I could see by examining the files. So, the question is whether it is legally possible to use autoconf for pr

Re: need powerful linux news client

If it will come down to implementing it, I'll use perl. First, I wanna make sure there isn't something in existance that does this out-of-the-box. ---= Miki Shapiro =-- ---= Cell: (+972)-56-322433 = ---= ICQ: 3EE853 =--- ---= Windows Programmer in Re

Re: Linux mail relay + MS Exchange

On Sun, 20 May 2001 10:54:46 +0200, Evgeny Popov <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > That what my company is going to implement in growing amounts at client > sites. > > If anyone can share his experience, especialy which freeware/GPL product to > use at Exchange site to pull the mail from Linux using

Re: need powerful linux news client

On Sun, 20 May 2001, Miki Shapiro wrote: > Hi all > > 1. Thx Eli/Ilya for answer on back-resolving a coupla days back. It hit > the spot :-) > > 2. Can someone recommend a news client for linux that can run over whole > newsgroups and automatically download attachments answering to certain > na

IPSec on 2.4.2/IPv4

Another Q: I want my box to suggest (yet not require) IPSec over my IPv4 connection, especially for incoming sessions. I have a custom-tailored 2.4.2 as it is, and I didn't find IPSec support in the config menu. I either missed something or... Can anyone point it out to me? (I also really hope

RE: Linux mail relay + MS Exchange

> -Original Message- > From: Tzafrir Cohen [SMTP:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] > Sent: à 20 îàé 2001 10:24 > To: Evgeny Popov > Subject: Re: Linux mail relay + MS Exchange > > On Sun, 20 May 2001, Evgeny Popov wrote: > > > That what my company is going to implement in growing amounts at cl

Linux mail relay + MS Exchange

That what my company is going to implement in growing amounts at client sites. If anyone can share his experience, especialy which freeware/GPL product to use at Exchange site to pull the mail from Linux using Pop/IMAP. Also some RTFM links would be great. Currently we use Redhat + Popbeamer com

Re: Hebrew on IGLU

On Sat, 19 May 2001 [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > I have what is probably a **silly** problem, but here it is. Although I have > Hebrew fonts and can see Hebrew in both directions using Konqueror on sites > like Walla, Ynet, Maariv, and many others, **DAVKA** on IGLU, I can't see > Hebrew (not that

need powerful linux news client

Hi all 1. Thx Eli/Ilya for answer on back-resolving a coupla days back. It hit the spot :-) 2. Can someone recommend a news client for linux that can run over whole newsgroups and automatically download attachments answering to certain naming criteria? something like News Agent or Xnews for Wind