On Sun, 6 May 2001 [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> On 06-May-2001 Oded Arbel wrote:
> > I'm trying to use libtool to help me build a library. I wrote a simple
> > Makefile (here's a snippet :
> > ...
>
> Good. libtool is the way to build libraries in different environment and
> stay sane.
Thanks :-)
Hi Shlomi,
QT 3.0 can do this (you can grab a snapshot and try it - although it's not in
the beta stages yet - probably will be this end of the month)..
I think that GTK 2.0 with Pango will also give you bidi features - again, you
can grab a snapshot...
Thanks,
--
Hetz Ben Hamo
System Admini
On Mon, 7 May 2001, Shaul Karl wrote:
> [01:55:01 tmp]$ dig www.linux.org.il
>
> ; <<>> DiG 8.2 <<>> www.linux.org.il
> ;; res options: init recurs defnam dnsrch
> ;; res_nsend to server default -- 192.115.106.10: Connection timed out
> [04:59:02 tmp]$ host ns1.bezeqint.net
> ns1.bezeqint.net
[01:55:01 tmp]$ dig www.linux.org.il
; <<>> DiG 8.2 <<>> www.linux.org.il
;; res options: init recurs defnam dnsrch
;; res_nsend to server default -- 192.115.106.10: Connection timed out
[04:59:02 tmp]$ host ns1.bezeqint.net
ns1.bezeqint.netA 192.115.106.10
[04:59:44 tmp]$ ping -c1
I believe that what could be a useful thing to development is a
generic Rich Text Display and Editting Widget that supports Bi-Directional
text. I don't think Gtk+ and Qt have such a widget already, whether Bidi
or Not.
To make it useful it should be distributed under the LGPL or some more
liber
On Mon, 7 May 2001, Ely Levy wrote:
> I see no reason to use reiserfs beside the fact xfs is not offecialy in
> the kernel yet.
And is not supported by the distributions.
> I don't think it can even get close in reliabilty and preformance
> is reisierfs even 64 bit?
>
It is possible to create
On Sat, 5 May 2001, Nadav Har'El wrote:
> As Alon Altman pointed out a couple of days ago, to allow sending Hebrew
> SMSs all that was needed to do in SendSMS is just what I had suggested in
> the comments.
> I'm releasing a new version (2.1) of my SendSMS, at the usual place
(snip description of
I see no reason to use reiserfs beside the fact xfs is not offecialy in
the kernel yet.
I don't think it can even get close in reliabilty and preformance
is reisierfs even 64 bit?
forgive my spelling 2 am:)
Ely Levy
System group
Hebrew University
Jerusalem Israel
On Mon, 7 May 2001, Ilya K
On Sun, May 06, 2001 at 07:28:48PM +0300, Ely Levy wrote:
> http://linux-xfs.sgi.com/projects/xfs/
Think it's any use for the home user as a replacement for ReiserFS as
the fast-recovering filesystem? Or is it more suitable for servers?
--
Best regards,
Ilya Konstantinov
==
On 06-May-2001 Oded Arbel wrote:
> I'm trying to use libtool to help me build a library. I wrote a simple
> Makefile (here's a snippet :
> ...
Good. libtool is the way to build libraries in different environment and
stay sane.
> I've tried to link against the .la file buf ld failed saying that
>
OA>> I'll think about, but I don't think I'll change from semaphores just yet.
OA>> I don't like the idea of creating temp files for locks, and I can't lock
Actually, cleaning temp file is by far easier than cleaning semaphore.
Especially if your app can be killed any moment.
OA>> against an exi
OA>> I don't think its an option I have for the current
OA>> implementation - it's file IO, and should be much slower, right
OA>> ?
Wrong. Record locking has nothing to do with file I/O - it is done
entirely in memory.
--
[EMAIL PROTECTED] \/ There shall be counsels taken
Stanislav Malysh
gk>> not terribly good portability, according to
gk>> /usr/src/linux/Documentatino/mandatory.txt , for mandatory locks?
gk>> advisory locks can be used, but then you only have a single such lock
gk>> available per file. if you need to use several locks, you need to keep
What? You sure should use
Hey,
Since it been few days already and no one wrote about it..
XFS 1.0 is released for linux I guess most people think now
yea well another FS what's the big deal. well this time it's not just
another FS it's sgi one and they hacked the kernel to add many features
linux needed for years
includi
On Sun, May 06, 2001 at 04:05:11PM +0300, Ben-Nes Michael wrote:
> Hi All
>
> Where or what is the rc.local on debian ?
/etc/init.d/bootmisc.sh looks like a good place for your custom startup
commands. I have my hdparm optimizations in there.
--
Best regards,
Ilya Konstantinov
===
Oded Arbel wrote:
> Actually, what I would like to know is - what happened to the "Secure"
> version of Mandrake's 2.2 kernel ? is the 'secure' patches were ported to
> 2.4.3mdk ?
As far as I understood, this stuff is based on 3rd parties and orgs which
didn't make it available for 2.4 yet.
>
On Sun, 6 May 2001, Eli Marmor wrote:
> Mandrake, basing on these companies, could not make a 2.4 port of "its"
> secure kernel.
> Now, the only question that remains (Nir?):
>
> Where can one find 2.4.4 with Mandrake improvements?
> The kernel which comes with Mandrake 8.0 is 2.4.3, and if you
Hi All
Where or what is the rc.local on debian ?
--
Canaan Surfing Ltd.
Internet Service Providers
Ben-Nes Michael - Manager
Tel: 972-4-6991122
http://sites.canaan.co.il
--
=
To uns
Oded Arbel wrote:
> About Mandrake's "Secure" kernel - with 2.4, Mandrake no longer has a
> "secure kernel package". my assumption was that simply most (or all) of
> Mandrake's secure patches features already exist in 2.4, and hence no
> need for a specially secure kernel. is that correct or BS ?
Hi list.
I'm trying to use libtool to help me build a library. I wrote a simple
Makefile (here's a snippet :
all: ${TARGET}
${TARGET}: ${OBJS}
libtool ${CC} ${CXXFLAGS} -g -o ${TARGET} ${LIBS} ${OBJS}
MyLib.lo: MyLib.cpp
libtool ${CC} ${CXXFLAGS} ${DEFS} ${INCS} -g -O -c MyLib
> Hi,
>
> I am trying to configure RAID, to be used as a raw device, on RedHat 6.2
> (Kernel 2.2-16).
>
> After building the /etc/raidtab file for raid-level 1, I defined several
> devices with the "mkraid" utility
> and right now there are several devices: /dev/md0, /dev/md1, ...
>
> In orde
On Sun, 6 May 2001, guy keren wrote:
> > I don't think its an option I have for the current implementation - it's
> > file IO, and should be much slower, right ?
>
> well, i'm not sure that usage of locks performs any file I/O (after all,
> all the locks data is kept in memory, not on disk, as th
On Thu, 3 May 2001, Tzafrir Cohen wrote:
> On 3 May 2001, Yoav "Timmy" Bornstein wrote:
>
> > On 02 May 2001 19:51:36 +0300, Ilya Konstantinov wrote:
> > > On Wed, May 02, 2001 at 06:34:58PM +, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> > >
> > > > 3. I need a strong and stable ftp client (something like
> >
On Fri, 4 May 2001, Tzafrir Cohen wrote:
> I would like to correct something I wrote here a while ago, regarding one
> of the modifications which are part of Mandrake's "Secure" kernel:
>
About Mandrake's "Secure" kernel - with 2.4, Mandrake no longer has a
"secure kernel package". my assumption
> > Yes. This is one of the problems with semaphores. BTW, why not using file
> > locking instead of it? It has much cleaner and richer semantics and almost
> > none of the problems semaphores have.
not terribly good portability, according to
/usr/src/linux/Documentatino/mandatory.txt , for mand
On Sun, 6 May 2001, Oded Arbel wrote:
> I don't know of any other really good Linux programming books out there,
> but if you need something to read to get you started with API programming
> in Linux, or want a backup sitting on your desktop - I can recommend it.
this book sohuld be used not ne
It's seem like ppp configuration.
Check your /etc/ppp/option file
and check if it contains the following lines:
ipcp-accept-remote
ipcp-accecpt-local
defaultroute
lock
debug
noauth
I think that one or more of that options it require but to make sure
try it or use the man page for pppd.
You can al
On Thu, 3 May 2001, Itay_Meiri wrote:
> >>Have "Advanced Programming in the UNIX environment" by Richard Stevens -
> >>borring as hell, but serves as a good book holder to prevent my Camel book
> >>from toppeling ;-)
>
> A matter of taste - I've got all his books!
>
True, so true :-)
Don't get m
Eli,
most of those changes appear inside the next official kernel, and if you want
the full features of redhat - just use the newest standard kernel + alan cox
latest ac patch..
For now, regarding to all the stuff with fork() functions etc I would suggest
to use 2.4.5pre1 or pre2 which will c
Shalom Lekulam,
This week's Bar-Ilan linux lecture...
David Shadmi
Introduction to the X-window system
(lecture 4 in the "beginners" series)
Wednesday, May 9, 19:45
"Shlifer 2"
30 matches
Mail list logo
