> > It's unrelated to kernel 2.4. Probably your winmodem has a
> > (proprietary) linux driver. Search at www.linmodems.org
>
> Almost no winmodem has an 'external' linux driver. I still didn't hear
> about this 2.4.0 support.. but about the drivers from linmodems.org, the
> only REAL, open sourc
On Mon, 25 Dec 2000, Oren Held wrote:
>
> Hello!
>
> A little question.. I used to be able to be able to type in hebrew in this
> pine (using an external program to change the keymap to hebrew). but now
> (I'm not sure what was changed), when I'm typing a hebrew letter it just
> says 'unknown com
Hello!
A little question.. I used to be able to be able to type in hebrew in this
pine (using an external program to change the keymap to hebrew). but now
(I'm not sure what was changed), when I'm typing a hebrew letter it just
says 'unknown command'.. anyone knows this problem ?
Thanks,
Oren.
Hello Matan
> It's unrelated to kernel 2.4. Probably your winmodem has a
> (proprietary) linux driver. Search at www.linmodems.org
Almost no winmodem has an 'external' linux driver. I still didn't hear
about this 2.4.0 support.. but about the drivers from linmodems.org, the
only REAL, open sour
Hello David
> WHAT?
> In kernel 2.4.0 winmodems should work?
> Are you sure?
> It's called an unstable kernel, Why? What makes it unstable? I want linux to
> work with my wimmodem If I will install kernel 2.4.0, will it work?
I didn't hear about it, but he could be right..
Anyway.. 2.4.0 is c
On Saturday 23 December 2000 17:58, Amir Tal wrote:
> hi list,
>
> when telneting to localhost on port 25, sendmail reply's.
> when trying to port 110, i get :
>
> Trying 127.0.0.1...
> telnet: Unable to connect to remote host: Connection refused
>
> the port is listed at /etc/services , and sendm
> I had a HSP modem on a 233 MHZ pentuim (really slow... ah?) running a RH6
> (kernel 2.17)
> Closed soure? what about kernel 2.4? is it open source? so what if the drivr
> for the kernel is source closed,
> as long as it works?
Will it work with kernel 2.4? will it work with kernel 2.6? Will it
> WHAT?
> In kernel 2.4.0 winmodems should work?
> Are you sure?
> It's called an unstable kernel, Why? What makes it unstable? I want linux to
> work with my wimmodem If I will install kernel 2.4.0, will it work?
It's unrelated to kernel 2.4. Probably your winmodem has a
(proprietary) linux
WHAT?
In kernel 2.4.0 winmodems should work?
Are you sure?
It's called an unstable kernel, Why? What makes it unstable? I want linux to
work with my wimmodem If I will install kernel 2.4.0, will it work?
David
- Original Message -
From: Ely Levy <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: Oren Held <[EM
- Original Message -
From: Matan Ziv-Av <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Cc: Shaul Karl <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>; Isreali Linux mailing list
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Saturday, December 23, 2000 11:56 PM
Subject: Re: PCI modem
>
> On Sat, 23 Dec 2000 [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
>
> >
On Sun, 24 Dec 2000, Oded Arbel wrote:
> setting the nolocal option causes 2 things -
> 1. any user that doesnt exist in the local password file still can't log on,
> because getpwnam() fails
> 2. the root can't login (unless there exist a user "root" in the PDC) ;-)
i think you should be able
Maybe /hosts.deny ?
- Original Message -
From: "Amir Tal" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: "Iglu" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Saturday, December 23, 2000 5:58 PM
Subject: Sendmail
> hi list,
>
> when telneting to localhost on port 25, sendmail reply's.
> when trying to port 110, i get :
>
> Trying
On Sun, 24 Dec 2000, Ely Levy wrote:
> Real modems..yea I forgot anything that linux didn't think about first
> isn't real?
A modem is a modulator-demodulator. as DSP-less "modem" does not
modulate, and does not demodulate, so can hardly be called a modem. This
is regardless of whether a driver
From: "guy keren" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>
> On Sun, 24 Dec 2000, Oded Arbel wrote:
>
> > Thanks :-)
>
> ma "toda"? da've'ach!
>
> and seriously, once you get this thing working for a while, let us know
> how it works. i never actually tried this (authenticating unix users
> against an NT PDC? blah..
hi list,
when telneting to localhost on port 25, sendmail reply's.
when trying to port 110, i get :
Trying 127.0.0.1...
telnet: Unable to connect to remote host: Connection refused
the port is listed at /etc/services , and sendmail is able to send messages
to the outside world.
can anyone direc
I've heard some stories to that effect, but I heard other stories about good
service from plonter - I my self am one (after replacing my video card for
the second time, for free - including shipment, and concluding that the
problem was a wierd interaction with me MB, they sold me a better one for
control your freege if you can get java to work!!:)
or run a virtual shrink on your toaster and see what it really thinks:)
Ely Levy
System group
Hebrew University
Jerusalem Israel
On Sat, 23 Dec 2000, Moshe Zadka wrote:
| On Sat, 23 Dec 2000, "Tizmo" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
|
| > T
Real modems..yea I forgot anything that linux didn't think about first
isn't real?
winmodem is just another chip no better than the new intel mother boards
that uses memory for the onboard screen card.
pctel chips (as in most win modems) sould work with kenrel 2.4.0
so you can just downlad the new
On Fri, 22 Dec 2000, Amir Tal wrote:
> a reminder :
> NOT all people that deal with system administration (of any kind) are Linux
> experts.
>
> if you know your way around Linux better then others - good for you ! but
> that's no reason to bust chops you know...
> what the hell were mailing lis
> Surely does not worth double humor exercises.
Sorry, I meant "sarcasm" (and not humor). Now it's triple posting...
=
To unsubscribe, send mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with
the word "unsubscribe" in the message body, e.g., run the co
It was only the preliminary suggestion, and not a rule set. I would spell it
so:" There is a USR modem that at least does not cost 100...150 NIS as it's
neighbors on the shelf, so it CAN be worth to call Office Depot and ask them
if it is a hardware modem, or come to the closest branch to see it".
I wrote:
> > 2. I have seen USR 56k modem ( probably PCI ) in Office Depot. According to
> > the price - 350 NIS it was a hardware modem.
>
> Yes. A higher price is a proof for quality and richer functionality.
> Like Windows and Linux.
Just to clarify the humor: Windows costs more than Linux.
22 matches
Mail list logo