Hi,
I am having sendmail 8.9.3 as a mail server and users complain that if
they forward a letter with an attachment, the attachment gets
garbled. Funnily this happens only for the Windows users. I tried
increasing the MIME header parameters to no avail.
This very version of sendmail is serving o
Hello All,
I finally fixed my problem with help from someone on this newsgroup.
Anyway, quite a few people from this newsgroup privately wrote me and
extended an offer of help - and I want to express how much gratitude I have
to them.
Thanks again to all of you!
Moses
-Original Message--
Aviram Jenik wrote:
>> Any attacker which is after your stuff and is able to penetrate a GSM
>> exchange and send an unauthrized message without anyone noticing
>> (remember that banks rely on the number as a ID good enough to identify
>> you and divolge your account details on SMS)
>
>
> Hey
more people then in kmail:-)
what happened to the vote btw?can I readd the replay header?
Ely Levy
System group
Hebrew University
Jerusalem Israel
On Tue, 28 Nov 2000, Herouth Maoz wrote:
| On Tuesday 28 November 2000 22:15, Jonathan Ben-Avraham wrote:
|
| > You answer your own question.
Hi, Ely!
On Wed, Nov 29, 2000 at 09:20:13PM +0200, you wrote the following:
> what happened to the vote btw?can I readd the replay header?
I've posted the vote results on linux-il some time ago. You can see
them at http://www.egroups.com/surveys/iglu?id=374380 . It's 11 to 8
against having the
>
> Any attacker which is after your stuff and is able to penetrate a GSM
> exchange and send an unauthrized message without anyone noticing
> (remember that banks rely on the number as a ID good enough to identify
> you and divolge your account details on SMS)
Hey... Gilad, I expected better fr
Ilya Konstantinov wrote:
> On Wed, Nov 29, 2000 at 12:50:32PM +0200, Gilad Ben-Yossef wrote:
>
>> Other methods of configuration could be very well added. How about
>> attaching an GSM phone to the machine and accepting instruction only
>> from SMS messages coming from a certain phone number
On Wed, 29 Nov 2000, Nadav Har'El wrote:
> But let's face it - we'll never agree on what is the "proper" way to handle
> replies to mailing-lists...
And so we prove my original point: using vi+sendmail, I'll stay by my
opinion on the proper way to handle mailing-list -- the while "it's
the fault
On Wed, 29 Nov 2000, Ilya Konstantinov wrote:
> On Wed, Nov 29, 2000 at 12:50:32PM +0200, Gilad Ben-Yossef wrote:
> > Other methods of configuration could be very well added. How about
> > attaching an GSM phone to the machine and accepting instruction only
> > from SMS messages coming from a c
On Wed, Nov 29, 2000 at 06:32:23PM +0200, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> BTW, in my case, I have an account with barak-online (not ADSL) and all my
> e-mail is sent via that account's POP mail. I also have a few other accounts
> (aquanet, netvision, etc.) and I receive e-mail at all of the accounts. I
On Wed, Nov 29, 2000 at 12:50:32PM +0200, Gilad Ben-Yossef wrote:
> Other methods of configuration could be very well added. How about
> attaching an GSM phone to the machine and accepting instruction only
> from SMS messages coming from a certain phone number.
That's a rather insecure way, BTW
I wasn't sure I should answer this on the list since it's slightly off-topic,
but there is a **LINUX perspective** here, so
The current situation with ADSL under LINUX is that Bezeq allows you to choose
from a list of ISPs and you can change whenever you want. As I wrote before,
two of them
1. I did not mean that bridge answers the ARP requests - sorry for my
incorrect fraise construction.
2. We have all-Hebrew company, My Mailer is MS Outlook which I have to keep
open during the working day. I do not know how to configure it not to send
my name in Hebrew and the Exchange administrat
Yngvi(*) wrote:
> Seems you can transparently define your external router IP ( ISP router )
> sitting on the other side of your bridge/firewall as default gateway for all
> the protected machines. The bridge cares to provide you with ARP responce
> for routers's MAC.
Right on the first sentenc
Alex Shnitman wrote:
> Hi, Gilad!
>
> On Wed, Nov 29, 2000 at 12:50:32PM +0200, you wrote the following:
>
>
>> The second is to NOT configure your firewall as a router, but rather as
>> a layer 2 bridge with IP firwalling rules(*2) and not give it an IP at
>> all (bridges don't need to ha
I've encountered a similar problem in my Mandrake 7.2 installation - if the
computer can't reach the DNS assigned to it, some applications behave like
you mentioned.
Midnight Commander stuff, and I guess that most GTK application attempt to
resolve their hostname by quering the DNS using gethostby
For your second question, see my post for the guy who asked how to configure
the simplest win->linux network. i.e. if you would give us some details of
how you configured the server, or what errors you are getting it might help
us solve your problem.
Just as a side wonder ... did you start the s
Seems you can transparently define your external router IP ( ISP router )
sitting on the other side of your bridge/firewall as default gateway for all
the protected machines. The bridge cares to provide you with ARP responce
for routers's MAC.
Hi list,
I haven't yet got ADSL. I use Linux exclusively here, and was
wondering - is it possible at all to choose different ISPs
and use them with your own username/password (on subscribtion
basis) rather than use guest accounts and pay per-minute
(as in a post I read here lately),
without Bezeq
1. When I'm tring to run GTK app (like xchat or gnapster) it seems to freeze,
but after 4 mins it runs.
why ?
2. I have apache 1.3. I can't access to the server with http://localhost or
127.0.0.1 .
Thanks
--
Yoav Bornstein.
Listen to Weird Al and George Carlin, watch South Park, use Linux and
Hi, Gilad!
On Wed, Nov 29, 2000 at 12:50:32PM +0200, you wrote the following:
> The second is to NOT configure your firewall as a router, but rather as
> a layer 2 bridge with IP firwalling rules(*2) and not give it an IP at
> all (bridges don't need to have an IP to function). Not having an I
Hi, Nadav!
On Tue, Nov 28, 2000 at 08:38:32PM +0200, you wrote the following:
> 2. The lists mentioned on these directives have other side-effects besides
> making "L" work. The most annoying side-effect (for me) is that for every
> mailing list message, in the message list, you see the
Omer Zak wrote:
> I have the following idea for a Linux based firewall, which will hopefully
> make it safer to connect a LAN to the Internet.
Not a bad shot at all, but here are two suggestion for improvements:
The first is to disable CD-ROM and HD completely and use the LRP(*1)
distributio
On Wed, Nov 29, 2000, Moshe Zadka wrote about "Re: OT: To: & Cc:":
> I use sometimes pine, sometimes mutt and sometimes MH. In each case,
> I usually either reply to the person specifically, or reply to the
> list in general and the person -- unless I remember that this
> person does not like to r
Moshe Zadka <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> > Let's start a poll ;)
>
> I've moved pine->mutt->nmh
elm -> pine -> vm -> gnus was my path, with OpenLook's mailtool
somewhere in between, relatively briefly. We are not on egroups any
more, are we? Is there a polling station on the ILUG site?
--
Ol
On Wed, 29 Nov 2000, Nadav Har'El wrote:
> On Tue, Nov 28, 2000, Herouth Maoz wrote about "Re: OT: To: & Cc:":
> > BTW, my e-mailer is KMail. It has reply and reply-to-all. How many
> > people use Mutt anyway?
>
> Let's start a poll ;)
I've moved pine->mutt->nmh
I love the nmh design, and hate
On Wed, 29 Nov 2000, Nadav Har'El wrote:
> You sort-of missed the point - if people were using vi & sendmail to send
> replies, then indeed almost nobody will reply to both the person on the
> list (except the people who _deliberately_ want to do that, but most people
> don't).
Huh? I'm not sure
On Tue, Nov 28, 2000, Herouth Maoz wrote about "Re: OT: To: & Cc:":
> BTW, my e-mailer is KMail. It has reply and reply-to-all. How many
> people use Mutt anyway?
Let's start a poll ;)
My mailer history was using mailx (a.k.a. Mail) until about 1992, when I
switched to elm, and only about a yea
On Wed, Nov 29, 2000, Moshe Zadka wrote about "Re: OT: To: & Cc:":
> On Tue, 28 Nov 2000, Guy Cohen wrote:
>
> > I been away from the list for a while and beed reading the list again
> > for the last few days. I could not help but noticing pepoel reply
> > to mails to the sender _and_ to the list
29 matches
Mail list logo
