Re: OT: To: & Cc:

2000-11-28 Thread Moshe Zadka
On Tue, 28 Nov 2000, Herouth Maoz wrote: > BTW, my e-mailer is KMail. It has reply and reply-to-all. How many > people use Mutt anyway? This sounds like the right time for a shameless plug: have you considered the newly created MUA PMH? While it's only in pre-alpha, you might want to play with

Re: OT: To: & Cc:

2000-11-28 Thread Moshe Zadka
On Tue, 28 Nov 2000, Guy Cohen wrote: > I been away from the list for a while and beed reading the list again > for the last few days. I could not help but noticing pepoel reply > to mails to the sender _and_ to the list, and i ask you why ? > In mutt you press the "L" for replying only to the li

Re: A better Linux based firewall installation?

2000-11-28 Thread Ariel Biener
On Tue, 28 Nov 2000, Omer Zak wrote: Omer dear, rebooting a firewall means stopping the service to your customer. Hardly the way to go. I can't imagine that every added rule to the firewall would require such an ackward procedure. Not to mention how reliable floppy diskettes are. --Ariel > >

Re: A better Linux based firewall installation?

2000-11-28 Thread Omer Zak
On Tue, 28 Nov 2000, Ariel Biener wrote: > On Tue, 28 Nov 2000, Omer Zak wrote: > > > 3. It will boot from a floppy disk (write-protected, of course) - as the > > PC on which I want to implement the idea is older and its BIOS does not > > know to boot directly from CD-ROM. > > Here you sat w

Re: A better Linux based firewall installation?

2000-11-28 Thread Guy Cohen
Omer Zak <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > The advantage is that even if the root is compromised, the cracker's > ability to inflict actual damage will be limited. I may be missing something here, but once an attacker have root access to your firewall, what prevents her from modifying routing tabl

Fw: LOOKING FOR GOOD BOOKS ON LINUX AND POSIX PROGRAMING IN ISRAEL.........

2000-11-28 Thread Avi Boots
try, http://www.privat.schlund.de/a/amiga/ http://www.amigau.com/c-programming/assembler/assemblerlinks.htm http://www.megabytebooks.com/catalogue/88/1873308272/ Title Amiga Assembler Insider Guide Subject Amiga ISBN 1873308272 Author Paul Overaa Publisher Bruce Smith Books > Oded Avrishami

Re: A better Linux based firewall installation?

2000-11-28 Thread Ariel Biener
To achieve a perfectly secured system, follow the below algorithm: 1). Unplug computer from wall outlet. 2). Melt computer into a fish shaped piece of metal. 3). Paint blue. 4). Throw in the ocean. ve ha mevin iavin. --Ariel -- Ariel Biener e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] PGP(6.5.8) public key

Re: A better Linux based firewall installation?

2000-11-28 Thread Aviram Jenik
> I have the following idea for a Linux based firewall, which will hopefully > make it safer to connect a LAN to the Internet. The idea is quite nice (not new, though :-). > > The question - did anyone already do something similar? Yes, I can say that I did (sort of). I can't really give deta

Re: A better Linux based firewall installation?

2000-11-28 Thread Ariel Biener
On Tue, 28 Nov 2000, Omer Zak wrote: > 3. It will boot from a floppy disk (write-protected, of course) - as the > PC on which I want to implement the idea is older and its BIOS does not > know to boot directly from CD-ROM. Here you sat write protected. > 4. Any files, which may have to be mod

Re: LOOKING FOR GOOD BOOKS ON LINUX AND POSIX PROGRAMING IN ISRAEL.........

2000-11-28 Thread Daniel Feiglin
Oded Avrishami wrote: > > HELLO 2 U ALL FRICKS. > For a long time I'm tring to find good books that tells u everything about > linux programing in C, > ASSEMBLER, that will teach u how to use the linux OS, and also will explane > XWINDOWS AND POSIX programing. > > This is not relevent but I know

A better Linux based firewall installation?

2000-11-28 Thread Omer Zak
I have the following idea for a Linux based firewall, which will hopefully make it safer to connect a LAN to the Internet. 1. The firewall will be a dedicated machine. 2. Its root filesystem and all software will be burned in a CD-ROM. The other filesystems (floppy and hard disk) will be moun

Re: OT: To: & Cc:

2000-11-28 Thread Herouth Maoz
On Tuesday 28 November 2000 22:15, Jonathan Ben-Avraham wrote: > You answer your own question. The double reply is for folks who post > to lists to which they do not subscribe. Think about it. Also to people who subscribe in digest mode, and may want to have an immediate reply when they ask a q

Re: OT: To: & Cc:

2000-11-28 Thread Guy Cohen
Oleg Goldshmidt <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > How does mutt know what is list and what is a person? > Good point, i have forgot that. in .muttrc put a line start with: lists . For example i have there: lists [EMAIL PROTECTED] [EMAIL PROTECTED] [EMAIL PROTECTED] etc. This will also put the name

Re: OT: To: & Cc:

2000-11-28 Thread Nadav Har'El
And just when we thought the reply-to thread was dead for good ;) On Tue, Nov 28, 2000, Jonathan Ben-Avraham wrote about "Re: OT: To: & Cc:": > On Tue, 28 Nov 2000, Guy Cohen wrote: > > > I been away from the list for a while and beed reading the list again > ~

Re: OT: To: & Cc:

2000-11-28 Thread Oleg Goldshmidt
Guy Cohen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > I been away from the list for a while and beed reading the list again > for the last few days. I could not help but noticing pepoel reply > to mails to the sender _and_ to the list, and i ask you why ? > In mutt you press the "L" for replying only to the li

Re: OT: To: & Cc:

2000-11-28 Thread Jonathan Ben-Avraham
On Tue, 28 Nov 2000, Guy Cohen wrote: > I been away from the list for a while and beed reading the list again ~ > for the last few days. I could not help but noticing pepoel reply > to mails to the sender _and_ to the list, and i ask you why ? > In mutt you p

OT: To: & Cc:

2000-11-28 Thread Guy Cohen
I been away from the list for a while and beed reading the list again for the last few days. I could not help but noticing pepoel reply to mails to the sender _and_ to the list, and i ask you why ? In mutt you press the "L" for replying only to the list, so is that so hard to do that instead of ty

Re: How Do I Create Simplest Network: Win98 <-> Linux?

2000-11-28 Thread Sagi Bashari
should be easy.. check those howto's: http://www.linuxdoc.org/HOWTO/mini/Home-Network-mini-HOWTO.html http://www.linuxdoc.org/HOWTO/IP-Masquerade-HOWTO.html if you still need help after you read them, email us =) On Tue, 28 Nov 2000, Moses Ellias wrote: > > I am trying to set up the simplest

Re: How Do I Create Simplest Network: Win98 <-> Linux?

2000-11-28 Thread Guy Cohen
Why pay for an answer you can get here, at linux-network mailling list or any where else ? If you would give some information about routing tables, ifconfigs output, or any errors you can log to the list, i'm sure you'll solve it with no problems. Guy Moses Ellias <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: >

How Do I Create Simplest Network: Win98 <-> Linux?

2000-11-28 Thread Moses Ellias
I am trying to set up the simplest network possible network connecting a Windows 98 machine with a Redhat 6.1 server machine. In each machine I have a 3com 3c905c card connected by a cross cable. I am having a difficult time with this. If there is anyone out there who can help me get through t

Re: LOOKING FOR GOOD BOOKS ON LINUX AND POSIX PROGRAMING IN ISRAEL.........

2000-11-28 Thread Omer Musaev
Oded Avrishami wrote: > HELLO 2 U ALL FRICKS. > For a long time I'm tring to find good books that tells u everything about > linux programing in C, > ASSEMBLER, that will teach u how to use the linux OS, and also will explane > XWINDOWS AND POSIX programing. There is no such single book. You c

LOOKING FOR GOOD BOOKS ON LINUX AND POSIX PROGRAMING IN ISRAEL.........

2000-11-28 Thread Oded Avrishami
HELLO 2 U ALL FRICKS. For a long time I'm tring to find good books that tells u everything about linux programing in C, ASSEMBLER, that will teach u how to use the linux OS, and also will explane XWINDOWS AND POSIX programing. This is not relevent but I know u all fricks know about that : I also

need mamadrake 72 have cdr .help me please.

2000-11-28 Thread peter7
 

Re: StarOffice 5.2 CD?

2000-11-28 Thread Gavrie Philipson
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > > Hi > > Did any of you check on the freeware version, on www.openoffice.org, and > decided that it's not enough? > I havn't looked there myself (yet), but I was under the impression that > they released as freeware all of the latest closed-source (5.2?) version. > BTW