On Tue, 21 Nov 2000, Schlomo Schapiro wrote:
> I recently got fed up with the fact that my ssh sessions don't show up in
> utmp/wtmp so I installed openssh. By what I could see till now it seems to
> be 100% compatible with the commercial SSH, but I would like to hear other
> opinions about this.
Hi Linuxers,
I recently got fed up with the fact that my ssh sessions don't show up in
utmp/wtmp so I installed openssh. By what I could see till now it seems to
be 100% compatible with the commercial SSH, but I would like to hear other
opinions about this.
So, is there any reason not to use Ope
Hi,
from experience as a "decent sysadmin" I would say that people who need NT
& Linux should use BootPart (from www.winimage.com). It is really a good
utility and you don't have a risk of fucking up your system with the
dreaded "LI" message ...
Sincerely,
Schlomo Schapiro
---
email: [EMAIL
Hi,
actually you could use the driver from intel. It works very well and
supports many intel100 cards. I already had a case of a not-so-standard
chipset that was supported better by the intel driver (x8EB chip).
Schlomo
Sincerely,
Schlomo Schapiro
---
email: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
WWW: http://
No Sparc version is planned, but Alpha version is being prepared..
Thats from my knowledge only. I could be wrong, but if I recall
correctly, Redhat has stopped creating Sparc versions due to a low
demand...
Hetz
"Geoffrey S. Mendelson" wrote:
>
> Has anyone heard if or when there will be a R
Moshe Zadka wrote:
> What 2.4.0 kernels? If you need NFS server, and you've got a Sun machine,
> I'd stick with Solaris until 2.4.0 comes out (not -testx).
Maybe I wasn't clear. The SUN runs Solaris, our horde of intel machines
and an alpha or two run Linux.
The 2.2 kernels do not do NFS very we
On Tue, 21 Nov 2000, Geoffrey S. Mendelson wrote:
> Why, besides the utterly horrid NFS in the 2.2.x kernels and the almost
> working NFS support in the 2.4.0 kernels. :-)
What 2.4.0 kernels? If you need NFS server, and you've got a Sun machine,
I'd stick with Solaris until 2.4.0 comes out (not
Moshe Zadka wrote:
> AFAIK Red Hat dropped Sun support.
Ouch, oh well. There was nothing on their web site, so it wouldn't
surprise me.
> Since most Suns are servers, I think using RH7.0 for them would be,
> ah, unwise.
Why, besides the utterly horrid NFS in the 2.2.x kernels and the almost
Ely Levy wrote:
>
> If by Sun you mean sparc then till now redhat been releasing versions for
> it.
Yes, but there seems to be no mention of it on their website. :-(
> As for alpha I think there should be as well..but am not sure..
> then again why would you want to run linux on alpha computer?
On Tue, 21 Nov 2000, Geoffrey S. Mendelson wrote:
> Has anyone heard if or when there will be a Red Hat 7 release for
> SUN or ALPHA?
AFAIK Red Hat dropped Sun support.
Since most Suns are servers, I think using RH7.0 for them would be,
ah, unwise.
No knowledge about Alphas, though.
--
Moshe
Hi...
does anyone have some experience with RH 6.2/7.0 on sparc?
I need it compared if possible to Solaris 2.6 on Sun Ultra-10 and Enterprise
220/440. (With\Without Multiple CPU's...)
Thanks.
Benji
=
To unsubscribe, send mail to
If by Sun you mean sparc then till now redhat been releasing versions for
it.
As for alpha I think there should be as well..but am not sure..
then again why would you want to run linux on alpha computer??
with all the respect to linux it's not the idel OS for T64..
Ely Levy
System group
Hebrew U
Has anyone heard if or when there will be a Red Hat 7 release for
SUN or ALPHA?
TIA,
Geoff.
--
Geoffrey S. Mendelson
Tel: (03) 6944-211 Fax: (03) 6944-225 Email: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
=
To unsubscribe, send mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED
Galia Gitliz wrote:
> Hi everybody
>
> Does anybody knows where I can find a driver for a net card of type "Intel Pro/100
>Ve".
This is a normal Ether Express Pro 100 (driver eepro100) EXCEPT for one thing -
the PCI id for it is 80861030 instead of 80861229. Patch kernel.
Marc
èº{
14 matches
Mail list logo
