Hi List, Ira !
at work I am currently installing a Linux system for Office/Intranet/Edu.
This includes Apache Proxy/ProxyPass/VirtualHosts, Samba (Main + TNG),
sendmail, ipchains (later) etc. We are permanently connected, though.
I'll be glad to give a lecture on these topics, especially Samba
Hi all
I tried making an rpm package of the heblatex package (from
http://www.dsg.technion.ac.il/heblatex/ )
The package can currently be found at:
http://www.technion.ac.il/~tzafrir/Rpms/
The rpm *should* work for any rpm-based system. It rely on tetex being
installed on the system.
I would a
Guy,
I believe what he tried to say is the common thought that once you teach
people how to protect themselves - it becomes obsolete, as the hackers read
it too.
However - good security design is NOT one that is based on the ambiguity of
the solution, but rather on the design, and therefore - th
Hi,
> >If Netscape doesn't support it, it should ignore it.
> >What is 'Active Pages' anyway? There's ASP, which is an unrelated
> >server-side technology, and there are tags with ActiveX (OLE)
> >objects.
>
Actually ASP and are different technologies.
ASP is a server side technology. It's
guy keren wrote:
>
> On Fri, 4 Feb 2000, Omer Efraim wrote:
>
> yes, but the way the pop server works, it still performs these files
> copies, no matter if the user eventually downloads their email or not (at
> least qpopper used to make a file copy operation immediatly when the
> user's mail cl
On Fri, 4 Feb 2000, Ilya Konstantinov wrote:
> On Fri, Feb 04, 2000 at 08:22:02PM +0200, guy keren wrote:
> > (for instalce) - the usage of mail dirs. when you have all mail stored in
> > one large file, the pop server needs to copy this email folder back and
>
> Although having dozens of files
On Fri, 4 Feb 2000, Omer Efraim wrote:
> Don't forget that on large corporate mail systems quite a lot
> of the cpu load comes from people _checking_ for mail.
> Imagine 10k users, each checking for mail every 5 minutes.
> Each one of those requires a fork even if the user has no (new?) mail.
y
On Fri, Feb 04, 2000 at 08:22:02PM +0200, guy keren wrote:
> (for instalce) - the usage of mail dirs. when you have all mail stored in
> one large file, the pop server needs to copy this email folder back and
Although having dozens of files for each user is appealing
as a quick solution, don't we
guy keren wrote:
>
> On Sun, 30 Jan 2000, Omer Efraim wrote:
>
> if you want to check on improving a situation, you first need to check
> exactly what is the situation - i'm not suer that the current method, of
> forking off a process for each connection, is very problematic - the life
> time of
On Sun, 30 Jan 2000, Omer Efraim wrote:
> Actually, this whole conversation got me to thinking
> about how a lot of large-scale pop servers (in particular)
> are doing it all wrong(?), and about how one can probably
> come up with a quick hackjob that would scale much better
> than traditional po
I am using fetchmail as root, to collect the mail for all users on my
system. The cronjob entry is as follows:
fetchmail -a -K -s -l 5 -w 1800 -t 90
The limit and warning flags, do not notify the root or the individual users
of an oversized mail still sitting on the ISP's POP server.
Is an
I'll chime in as well to say that Maximum Security was a great read. Yes,
it is old (very old, 1998). You can't read the book, audit a network and
declare anything as being secure. What it's good for is giving those who
have no or little experience with network security (such as myself) an
idea o
12 matches
Mail list logo
