On Wed, 29 Sep 1999, Eugene L. Berman wrote:
>
> Our company has two domains, e.g. FOO.com and BOO.co.il.
> How do I configure mail server so that it will have the full name
> mail.FOO.com but will also receive mails for users at BOO.co.il?
> For example, user joe will receive mail for both [EMA
Our company has two domains, e.g. FOO.com and BOO.co.il.
How do I configure mail server so that it will have the full name
mail.FOO.com but will also receive mails for users at BOO.co.il?
For example, user joe will receive mail for both [EMAIL PROTECTED]
and [EMAIL PROTECTED]
One more question.
Hi,
on the CD there is the BOOK in english (look under docs or something like
this. In the book you'll find help.
In general it's quite simple: Compile the kernel you need and edit
/etc/conf.modules to call the correct modules.
I am using it and SuSE is really one of the better distros amongst
Maybe I'm lazy (no flames please), but after using my current OS/2
e-mail client, I don't really want to go back to a command line
solution like PROCMAIL. Again, thanks to those who suggested it, and
I'm sure it is a powerful tool, but I guess I didn't make myself
clear in my previous question. I'
Probably one of the oldest hoaxes around, fairly competing for the top
with "kidney stealing gang" and "nazi newsgroups' RFV" letters...
"Erez Katz" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> > > >>Dear All, PLEASE pass this mail on to everybody you know. It is
> > > >>the request of a special litt
On Wed, 29 Sep 1999, guy keren wrote:
> next thing you'l tell me that you can write a program that has 0 bugs...
No. But a program that is designed properly and only does one thing has
less chances of having bugs than bloated pieces of crap.
> and that you can 'inspect and secure' each and eve
On 27 Sep 1999, Adam Morrison wrote:
> To give an example, you don't need to know a lot to run OpenBSD. But
> the security people at OpenBSD do know what they're doing. (Notethat
> I'm NOT saying that OpenBSD is 100% secure.)
then in your own words, openBSD is insecure (i.e. anything less th
I'm sorry but I have to
GREAT!!
Both an installfest and my birthday on the same day!!
Sorry again
Yoni Elhanani wrote:
> Hello.
>
> I'm happy to announce the new installfest, this time with some more
> details.
>
> It will be held in Dizengoff Center, on friday morning 8/10/99,
> In front
You are having this problem because Samba does not support a Primary
Domain Controller (PDC) functionality at this time. This functionality is
currently under development is undocumented.
rizvi inamdar wrote:
> hi
>
> i am having one problem with loging on windows NT workstation to linux
> samba
I have the evaluation cd. I can find nowhere in it how to configure the
sound modules of my card.
I guess there must be something like "sndconfig" in redhat to do the job
without rebuilding the kernel ?
nothing on the cd (cheapbytes) and I don't understand a word from all the
german suse mailing-
As Ilya Konstantinov pointed it, this is nothing new. The purpose, imo,
of the WinLinux distribution is it's ease of installation. For the time
being, one of the scariest things that a new wannabee Linux user run's
into first is the Installation.
Correct, they could install one of the other dis
For a short time.
Yes
I let the list know when the mirror will be up
Yoni Elhanani wrote:
> Ben-Nes Michael wrote:
> >
> > Sound very intresting.
> >
> > Ill download it, though the site is super slow :-(
>
> Can you set up a mirror then?
>
> --
>
> The day Microsoft makes something that doesn'
I wonder when they'll do a Linux 4 NT.
That might even be good for the NT.
Mike
Ilya Konstantinov wrote:
> So it is basically a distro which has a Windows-based
> install app which assumes about installed hardware
> from Windows registry and installs into a UMSDOS
> partition as a regular Lin
Well, I just asked for RFC's, did't say that i'm gonna install it.
Stop being sucha a pain in the neck.
Mike
Or Sagi wrote:
> Thank you, michael.
>
> now the entire world can sleep soundly tonight, knowing that _you_, above
> all people, are going to download it.
>
> Who's the next person
Hello.
I'm happy to announce the new installfest, this time with some more
details.
It will be held in Dizengoff Center, on friday morning 8/10/99,
In front of the burger king - you know where. :-)
The sure sponsors are PF1, Compaq, and Mootag (the local computer
store),
Others may join too (si
r>> Forgot to mention it earlier, but as a solution (I thought somethin' got
r>> corrupted) I tried to compile a new kernel (same 2.2.10) but it kept
r>> crashing, exiting at different stages, Though I cant quote it's messages
r>> now. Fact is I couldn't compile a new kernel. Think it's related ?
"Stanislav Malyshev a.k.a Frodo" wrote:
>
> r>> Now for the good part: At the same time, on the same machine (dual boot
> r>> Linux+Win98), Windoze98 is starting to go totally berserk, many times
> r>> reporting at boot time about registry problem (and restart needed...) or
> r>> simply spontaneo
r>> Now for the good part: At the same time, on the same machine (dual boot
r>> Linux+Win98), Windoze98 is starting to go totally berserk, many times
r>> reporting at boot time about registry problem (and restart needed...) or
r>> simply spontaneously giving it's famous "blue screens". Occasionall
Hi all,
O.K. I've been using Linux flawlessly for a year or so on a few machines
and never seen Linux behaves as "badly" as this:
When booting to Linux (RH6 with 2.2.10 kernel), at the very beginning
(right when "init" goes into action) the booting halted while I got a
few lines "...respawning
On Tue, 28 Sep 1999, Or Sagi wrote:
Relax Or. No need to be cynical
--Ariel
> Thank you, michael.
>
> now the entire world can sleep soundly tonight, knowing that _you_, above
> all people, are going to download it.
>
> Who's the next person to go "Me too ! Me too!" ?
>
> For those of yo
hi
i am having one problem with loging on windows NT workstation to linux
samba server.
at the time of installing winnt workstation if i say domain it give an
error create computer account in domain.
kindly help me how to logon to domain from winnt Workstation at the
present i am loging locall
Thank you, michael.
now the entire world can sleep soundly tonight, knowing that _you_, above
all people, are going to download it.
Who's the next person to go "Me too ! Me too!" ?
For those of you that wonder (as featured on /.), there's nothing
special about winlinux --- just another umsdos
So it is basically a distro which has a Windows-based
install app which assumes about installed hardware
from Windows registry and installs into a UMSDOS
partition as a regular Linux distro?
All that in case you have a ready Windows machine
already (hmm, remind of Windows upgrades which search
fo
Where are you planning to organize it?
And why not during the holidays? I thought most people here are
working/studying and would find it more convenient during holidays...
--
Best regards,
Ilya Konstantinov, GalaNet Webmaster
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
=
Sound very intresting.
Ill download it, though the site is super slow :-(
Mike ALmogy wrote:
> Any Request for Comments ?
>
> http://www.winlinux.net/
>
> Mike
>
> --
>
> Michael Almogy.
> System Administrator
> Mofet Institute.
> Cel : 972-052-562237
> Tel : 97
Any Request for Comments ?
http://www.winlinux.net/
Mike
--
Michael Almogy.
System Administrator
Mofet Institute.
Cel : 972-052-562237
Tel : 972-03-6901415
Fax : 972-03-6901414
Nathan Fain wrote:
>
> I was just wondering if there was a FAQ for this list. Seems to me there
> should be. Unlike other lists I am seeing allot of practically
> questions. Which is actually nice to see and makes a good base for a
> FAQ.
Yes there is.
You should have read the archive and fou
27 matches
Mail list logo
