On Wed, Mar 27, 2024 at 04:03:11PM +, Allen Pais wrote:
> The only generic interface to execute asynchronously in the BH context is
> tasklet; however, it's marked deprecated and has some design flaws. To
> replace tasklets, BH workqueue support was recently added. A BH workqueue
> behaves simi
On Thu, Mar 28, 2024 at 10:52:16AM -0700, Allen wrote:
> On Wed, Mar 27, 2024 at 11:05 AM Corey Minyard wrote:
> >
> > I believe that work queues items are execute single-threaded for a work
> > queue, so this should be good. I need to test this, though. It may be
> &
t; > own
> > > workqueue.
> > >
> > > Thanks for taking time out to review.
> >
> > After looking and thinking about it a bit, a BH context is still
> > probably the best for this.
> >
> > I have tested this patch under load and vari
= {
> #ifdef CONFIG_PROC_FS
> #include
>
> -static struct ctl_table ipmi_table[] = {
> +static const struct ctl_table ipmi_table[] = {
> { .procname = "poweroff_powercycle",
> .data = &poweroff_powercycle,
> .maxlen = sizeof(poweroff_powercycle),
For the IPMI portion:
Acked-by: Corey Minyard
