> From: Naman Jain
> Sent: Monday, March 10, 2025 9:45 PM
> > [...]
> > Hi Greg,
> > I understand this is deviating from the discussions that we have had
> > till now, but I wanted to kindly request your opinion on the following
> > approach, which came up in one of our internal discussions.
> >
>
On 3/5/2025 12:36 PM, Naman Jain wrote:
On 2/27/2025 11:54 AM, Naman Jain wrote:
On 2/26/2025 8:03 PM, Greg Kroah-Hartman wrote:
On Wed, Feb 26, 2025 at 05:51:46PM +0530, Naman Jain wrote:
On 2/26/2025 3:33 PM, Greg Kroah-Hartman wrote:
On Wed, Feb 26, 2025 at 10:43:41AM +0530, Naman
On 2/27/2025 11:54 AM, Naman Jain wrote:
On 2/26/2025 8:03 PM, Greg Kroah-Hartman wrote:
On Wed, Feb 26, 2025 at 05:51:46PM +0530, Naman Jain wrote:
On 2/26/2025 3:33 PM, Greg Kroah-Hartman wrote:
On Wed, Feb 26, 2025 at 10:43:41AM +0530, Naman Jain wrote:
On 2/25/2025 2:09 PM, Greg
On 2/26/2025 8:03 PM, Greg Kroah-Hartman wrote:
On Wed, Feb 26, 2025 at 05:51:46PM +0530, Naman Jain wrote:
On 2/26/2025 3:33 PM, Greg Kroah-Hartman wrote:
On Wed, Feb 26, 2025 at 10:43:41AM +0530, Naman Jain wrote:
On 2/25/2025 2:09 PM, Greg Kroah-Hartman wrote:
On Tue, Feb 25, 2025 a
On Wed, Feb 26, 2025 at 05:51:46PM +0530, Naman Jain wrote:
>
>
> On 2/26/2025 3:33 PM, Greg Kroah-Hartman wrote:
> > On Wed, Feb 26, 2025 at 10:43:41AM +0530, Naman Jain wrote:
> > >
> > >
> > > On 2/25/2025 2:09 PM, Greg Kroah-Hartman wrote:
> > > > On Tue, Feb 25, 2025 at 02:04:43PM +0530, N
On 2/26/2025 3:33 PM, Greg Kroah-Hartman wrote:
On Wed, Feb 26, 2025 at 10:43:41AM +0530, Naman Jain wrote:
On 2/25/2025 2:09 PM, Greg Kroah-Hartman wrote:
On Tue, Feb 25, 2025 at 02:04:43PM +0530, Naman Jain wrote:
On 2/25/2025 11:42 AM, Greg Kroah-Hartman wrote:
On Tue, Feb 25, 2025
On Wed, Feb 26, 2025 at 10:43:41AM +0530, Naman Jain wrote:
>
>
> On 2/25/2025 2:09 PM, Greg Kroah-Hartman wrote:
> > On Tue, Feb 25, 2025 at 02:04:43PM +0530, Naman Jain wrote:
> > >
> > >
> > > On 2/25/2025 11:42 AM, Greg Kroah-Hartman wrote:
> > > > On Tue, Feb 25, 2025 at 10:50:01AM +0530,
On 2/25/2025 2:09 PM, Greg Kroah-Hartman wrote:
On Tue, Feb 25, 2025 at 02:04:43PM +0530, Naman Jain wrote:
On 2/25/2025 11:42 AM, Greg Kroah-Hartman wrote:
On Tue, Feb 25, 2025 at 10:50:01AM +0530, Naman Jain wrote:
On regular bootup, devices get registered to vmbus first, so when
uio_hv
On Tue, Feb 25, 2025 at 02:04:43PM +0530, Naman Jain wrote:
>
>
> On 2/25/2025 11:42 AM, Greg Kroah-Hartman wrote:
> > On Tue, Feb 25, 2025 at 10:50:01AM +0530, Naman Jain wrote:
> > > On regular bootup, devices get registered to vmbus first, so when
> > > uio_hv_generic driver for a particular d
On 2/25/2025 11:42 AM, Greg Kroah-Hartman wrote:
On Tue, Feb 25, 2025 at 10:50:01AM +0530, Naman Jain wrote:
On regular bootup, devices get registered to vmbus first, so when
uio_hv_generic driver for a particular device type is probed,
the device is already initialized and added, so sysfs cr
On Tue, Feb 25, 2025 at 10:50:01AM +0530, Naman Jain wrote:
> On regular bootup, devices get registered to vmbus first, so when
> uio_hv_generic driver for a particular device type is probed,
> the device is already initialized and added, so sysfs creation in
> uio_hv_generic probe works fine. Howe
11 matches
Mail list logo