On Tue, Mar 25, 2025 at 12:39:54PM -0400, Greg Kroah-Hartman wrote:
> On Tue, Mar 25, 2025 at 04:10:59PM +, Wei Liu wrote:
> > On Mon, Mar 10, 2025 at 03:12:01PM -0700, lon...@linuxonhyperv.com wrote:
> > > From: Long Li
> > >
> > > Hyper-V may offer a non latency sensitive device with subcha
On Tue, Mar 25, 2025 at 04:10:59PM +, Wei Liu wrote:
> On Mon, Mar 10, 2025 at 03:12:01PM -0700, lon...@linuxonhyperv.com wrote:
> > From: Long Li
> >
> > Hyper-V may offer a non latency sensitive device with subchannels without
> > monitor bit enabled. The decision is entirely on the Hyper-V
On Mon, Mar 10, 2025 at 03:12:01PM -0700, lon...@linuxonhyperv.com wrote:
> From: Long Li
>
> Hyper-V may offer a non latency sensitive device with subchannels without
> monitor bit enabled. The decision is entirely on the Hyper-V host not
> configurable within guest.
>
> When a device has subch
On Mon, Mar 10, 2025 at 03:12:01PM -0700, lon...@linuxonhyperv.com wrote:
> From: Long Li
>
> Hyper-V may offer a non latency sensitive device with subchannels without
> monitor bit enabled. The decision is entirely on the Hyper-V host not
> configurable within guest.
>
> When a device has subch
From: lon...@linuxonhyperv.com Sent: Monday, March
10, 2025 3:12 PM
>
> Hyper-V may offer a non latency sensitive device with subchannels without
> monitor bit enabled. The decision is entirely on the Hyper-V host not
> configurable within guest.
>
> When a device has subchannels, also signal e
From: Long Li
Hyper-V may offer a non latency sensitive device with subchannels without
monitor bit enabled. The decision is entirely on the Hyper-V host not
configurable within guest.
When a device has subchannels, also signal events for the subchannel
if its monitor bit is disabled.
This patc
