On Thu, 6 Mar 2025 at 01:17, Jason Wang wrote:
>
> On Wed, Mar 5, 2025 at 5:30 PM Stefano Garzarella wrote:
> >
> > On Wed, Mar 05, 2025 at 02:27:12AM -0500, Michael S. Tsirkin wrote:
> > >On Tue, Mar 04, 2025 at 04:39:02PM -0800, Bobby Eshleman wrote:
> > >> I think it might be a lot of complexi
On Tue, Mar 11, 2025 at 8:54 AM Jason Wang wrote:
>
> On Mon, Mar 10, 2025 at 10:15 PM Stefano Garzarella
> wrote:
> >
> > On Thu, 6 Mar 2025 at 01:17, Jason Wang wrote:
> > >
> > > On Wed, Mar 5, 2025 at 5:30 PM Stefano Garzarella
> > > wrote:
> > > >
> > > > On Wed, Mar 05, 2025 at 02:27:12
On Tue, Mar 11, 2025 at 4:14 AM Bobby Eshleman wrote:
>
> On Wed, Mar 05, 2025 at 01:46:54PM +0800, Jason Wang wrote:
> > On Wed, Mar 5, 2025 at 8:39 AM Bobby Eshleman
> > wrote:
> > >
> > > On Tue, Apr 28, 2020 at 06:00:52PM +0200, Stefano Garzarella wrote:
> > > > On Tue, Apr 28, 2020 at 04:13
On Mon, Mar 10, 2025 at 10:15 PM Stefano Garzarella wrote:
>
> On Thu, 6 Mar 2025 at 01:17, Jason Wang wrote:
> >
> > On Wed, Mar 5, 2025 at 5:30 PM Stefano Garzarella
> > wrote:
> > >
> > > On Wed, Mar 05, 2025 at 02:27:12AM -0500, Michael S. Tsirkin wrote:
> > > >On Tue, Mar 04, 2025 at 04:39
On Wed, Mar 05, 2025 at 01:46:54PM +0800, Jason Wang wrote:
> On Wed, Mar 5, 2025 at 8:39 AM Bobby Eshleman wrote:
> >
> > On Tue, Apr 28, 2020 at 06:00:52PM +0200, Stefano Garzarella wrote:
> > > On Tue, Apr 28, 2020 at 04:13:22PM +0800, Jason Wang wrote:
> >
> > WRT netdev, do we foresee big gai
On Thu, 6 Mar 2025 at 02:37, Lei Yang wrote:
>
> QE tested this series patch with virtio-net regression tests,
> everything works fine.
>
> Tested-by: Lei Yang
Sorry, but this test doesn't involve virtio-net at all, so what is the
point on testing it with virtio-net?
Thanks,
Stefano
>
> On Thu
QE tested this series patch with virtio-net regression tests,
everything works fine.
Tested-by: Lei Yang
On Thu, Mar 6, 2025 at 8:17 AM Jason Wang wrote:
>
> On Wed, Mar 5, 2025 at 5:30 PM Stefano Garzarella wrote:
> >
> > On Wed, Mar 05, 2025 at 02:27:12AM -0500, Michael S. Tsirkin wrote:
> >
On Wed, Mar 5, 2025 at 5:30 PM Stefano Garzarella wrote:
>
> On Wed, Mar 05, 2025 at 02:27:12AM -0500, Michael S. Tsirkin wrote:
> >On Tue, Mar 04, 2025 at 04:39:02PM -0800, Bobby Eshleman wrote:
> >> I think it might be a lot of complexity to bring into the picture from
> >> netdev, and I'm not s
On Wed, Mar 05, 2025 at 10:42:58AM +0100, Stefano Garzarella wrote:
> On Tue, Mar 04, 2025 at 04:06:02PM -0800, Bobby Eshleman wrote:
> > On Thu, Jan 16, 2020 at 06:24:25PM +0100, Stefano Garzarella wrote:
> >
> > One question: what is the behavior we expect from guest namespaces? In
> > v2, you
On Wed, Mar 05, 2025 at 10:30:17AM +0100, Stefano Garzarella wrote:
> On Wed, Mar 05, 2025 at 02:27:12AM -0500, Michael S. Tsirkin wrote:
> > On Tue, Mar 04, 2025 at 04:39:02PM -0800, Bobby Eshleman wrote:
> > > I think it might be a lot of complexity to bring into the picture from
> > > netdev, an
On Tue, Mar 04, 2025 at 04:06:02PM -0800, Bobby Eshleman wrote:
On Thu, Jan 16, 2020 at 06:24:25PM +0100, Stefano Garzarella wrote:
RFC -> v1:
* added 'netns' module param to vsock.ko to enable the
network namespace support (disabled by default)
* added 'vsock_net_eq()' to check the "net" a
On Wed, Mar 05, 2025 at 02:27:12AM -0500, Michael S. Tsirkin wrote:
On Tue, Mar 04, 2025 at 04:39:02PM -0800, Bobby Eshleman wrote:
I think it might be a lot of complexity to bring into the picture from
netdev, and I'm not sure there is a big win since the vsock device could
also have a vsock->n
On Tue, Mar 04, 2025 at 04:39:02PM -0800, Bobby Eshleman wrote:
> I think it might be a lot of complexity to bring into the picture from
> netdev, and I'm not sure there is a big win since the vsock device could
> also have a vsock->net itself? I think the complexity will come from the
> address tr
On Wed, Mar 5, 2025 at 8:39 AM Bobby Eshleman wrote:
>
> On Tue, Apr 28, 2020 at 06:00:52PM +0200, Stefano Garzarella wrote:
> > On Tue, Apr 28, 2020 at 04:13:22PM +0800, Jason Wang wrote:
> > >
> > >
> > > As we've discussed, it should be a netdev probably in either guest or host
> > > side. And
On Tue, Apr 28, 2020 at 06:00:52PM +0200, Stefano Garzarella wrote:
> On Tue, Apr 28, 2020 at 04:13:22PM +0800, Jason Wang wrote:
> >
> >
> > As we've discussed, it should be a netdev probably in either guest or host
> > side. And it would be much simpler if we want do implement namespace then.
>
On Thu, Jan 16, 2020 at 06:24:25PM +0100, Stefano Garzarella wrote:
> RFC -> v1:
> * added 'netns' module param to vsock.ko to enable the
>network namespace support (disabled by default)
> * added 'vsock_net_eq()' to check the "net" assigned to a socket
>only when 'netns' support is enabl
16 matches
Mail list logo
