On Fri, 2024-05-17 at 08:18 -0700, Dave Hansen wrote:
> On 5/17/24 07:19, Kirill A. Shutemov wrote:
> > arch/x86/boot/compressed/tdx.c| 32 +---
> > arch/x86/coco/tdx/tdcall.S| 145 ++-
> > arch/x86/coco/tdx/tdx-shared.c| 26 +--
> > arch/x86/coco/tdx/tdx.c
On 5/17/24 07:19, Kirill A. Shutemov wrote:
> arch/x86/boot/compressed/tdx.c| 32 +---
> arch/x86/coco/tdx/tdcall.S| 145 ++-
> arch/x86/coco/tdx/tdx-shared.c| 26 +--
> arch/x86/coco/tdx/tdx.c | 298 --
> arch/x86/hyperv/ivm.c
Sean noticing that the TDCALL wrappers were generating a lot of awful
code.
TDCALL calls are centralized into a few megawrappers that take the
struct tdx_module_args as input. Most of the call sites only use a few
arguments, but they have to zero out unused fields in the structure to
avoid data le
