Re: [EXTERNAL] RE: [PATCH 0/5] Add new headers for Hyper-V Dom0

2024-10-10 Thread MUKESH RATHOR
On 10/10/24 11:21, Michael Kelley wrote: > From: Nuno Das Neves Sent: Thursday, October 3, 2024 12:51 PM >> >> To support Hyper-V Dom0 (aka Linux as root partition), many new >> definitions are required. >> >> The plan going forward is to directly import headers from >> Hyper-V. This is

Re: [EXTERNAL] RE: [PATCH 3/5] hyperv: Add new Hyper-V headers

2024-10-10 Thread MUKESH RATHOR
Hi Michael, I can answer some of the questions since I instigated this effort while ago (you might find old email chain/s). On 10/10/24 11:21, Michael Kelley wrote: > From: Nuno Das Neves Sent: Thursday, October 3, 2024 12:51 PM >> >> Add definitions needed for privileged Hyper-V partitions

RE: [PATCH 3/5] hyperv: Add new Hyper-V headers

2024-10-10 Thread Michael Kelley
From: Nuno Das Neves Sent: Thursday, October 3, 2024 12:51 PM > > Add definitions needed for privileged Hyper-V partitions. > > These files are derived from headers exported from the hypervisor code. Could you elaborate on the naming conventions for the new files, and the rules that govern wha

RE: [PATCH 2/5] hyperv: Remove unnecessary #includes

2024-10-10 Thread Michael Kelley
From: Nuno Das Neves Sent: Thursday, October 3, 2024 12:51 PM > > asm/hyperv-tlfs.h is already included implicitly wherever mshyperv.h > or linux/hyperv.h is included. Remove those redundancies. I've been under the impression that it is preferable to directly include .h files for all definition

RE: [PATCH 0/5] Add new headers for Hyper-V Dom0

2024-10-10 Thread Michael Kelley
From: Nuno Das Neves Sent: Thursday, October 3, 2024 12:51 PM > > To support Hyper-V Dom0 (aka Linux as root partition), many new > definitions are required. > > The plan going forward is to directly import headers from > Hyper-V. This is a more maintainable way to import definitions > rather t