Re: [RFC PATCH net-next v6 04/14] af_vsock: generalize bind table functions

2024-07-30 Thread Amery Hung
On Tue, Jul 30, 2024 at 1:00 AM Stefano Garzarella wrote: > > On Sun, Jul 28, 2024 at 11:52:54AM GMT, Amery Hung wrote: > >On Tue, Jul 23, 2024 at 7:40 AM Stefano Garzarella > >wrote: > >> > >> On Wed, Jul 10, 2024 at 09:25:45PM GMT, Amery Hung wrote: > >> >From: Bobby Eshleman > >> > > >> >Thi

[PATCH net-next v2] net: mana: Implement get_ringparam/set_ringparam for mana

2024-07-30 Thread Shradha Gupta
Currently the values of WQs for RX and TX queues for MANA devices are hardcoded to default sizes. Allow configuring these values for MANA devices as ringparam configuration(get/set) through ethtool_ops. Signed-off-by: Shradha Gupta Reviewed-by: Haiyang Zhang Reviewed-by: Long Li --- Changes in

Re: [PATCH v2] Drivers: hv: vmbus: Optimize boot time by concurrent execution of hv_synic_init()

2024-07-30 Thread Srivatsa S. Bhat
On Mon, Jul 29, 2024 at 12:57:18AM -0700, Saurabh Sengar wrote: > Currently on a very large system with 1780 CPUs, hv_acpi_init() takes > around 3 seconds to complete. This is because of sequential synic > initialization for each CPU performed by hv_synic_init(). > > Schedule these tasks parallell

Re: [RFC PATCH net-next v6 09/14] virtio/vsock: add common datagram recv path

2024-07-30 Thread Stefano Garzarella
On Mon, Jul 29, 2024 at 05:35:01PM GMT, Amery Hung wrote: On Tue, Jul 23, 2024 at 7:42 AM Stefano Garzarella wrote: On Wed, Jul 10, 2024 at 09:25:50PM GMT, Amery Hung wrote: >From: Bobby Eshleman > >This commit adds the common datagram receive functionality for virtio >transports. It does not

Re: [RFC PATCH net-next v6 07/14] virtio/vsock: add common datagram send path

2024-07-30 Thread Stefano Garzarella
On Fri, Jul 26, 2024 at 04:22:16PM GMT, Amery Hung wrote: On Tue, Jul 23, 2024 at 7:42 AM Stefano Garzarella wrote: On Wed, Jul 10, 2024 at 09:25:48PM GMT, Amery Hung wrote: >From: Bobby Eshleman > >This commit implements the common function >virtio_transport_dgram_enqueue for enqueueing data

Re: [RFC PATCH net-next v6 05/14] af_vsock: use a separate dgram bind table

2024-07-30 Thread Stefano Garzarella
On Sun, Jul 28, 2024 at 02:37:24PM GMT, Amery Hung wrote: On Tue, Jul 23, 2024 at 7:41 AM Stefano Garzarella wrote: On Wed, Jul 10, 2024 at 09:25:46PM GMT, Amery Hung wrote: >From: Bobby Eshleman > >This commit adds support for bound dgram sockets to be tracked in a >separate bind table from

Re: [RFC PATCH net-next v6 04/14] af_vsock: generalize bind table functions

2024-07-30 Thread Stefano Garzarella
On Sun, Jul 28, 2024 at 11:52:54AM GMT, Amery Hung wrote: On Tue, Jul 23, 2024 at 7:40 AM Stefano Garzarella wrote: On Wed, Jul 10, 2024 at 09:25:45PM GMT, Amery Hung wrote: >From: Bobby Eshleman > >This commit makes the bind table management functions in vsock usable >for different bind tabl