On Wed, Dec 06, 2023 at 11:16:12PM +, justinst...@google.com wrote:
> This patch converts some basic cases of ethtool_sprintf() to
> ethtool_puts().
>
> The conversions are used in cases where ethtool_sprintf() was being used
> with just two arguments:
> | ethtool_sprintf(&data, buffer[i
On Tue, Dec 05, 2023 at 02:52:06PM -0800, Yury Norov wrote:
> On Tue, Dec 05, 2023 at 03:01:38AM -0800, Souradeep Chakrabarti wrote:
> > > > diff --git a/drivers/net/ethernet/microsoft/mana/gdma_main.c
> > > > b/drivers/net/ethernet/microsoft/mana/gdma_main.c
> > > > index 6367de0c2c2e..2194a53cce
On Thu, Dec 07, 2023 at 06:06:38PM +0100, Jeremi Piotrowski wrote:
> >
> >> This doesn't work in partitioning when TDVMCALLs go to L0:
> >> TDVMCALL_MAP_GPA bypasses
> >> L1 and TDX_ACCEPT_PAGE is L1 responsibility.
> >>
> >> If you want to see how this is currently supported take a look at
> >>
On 07/12/2023 18:21, Jeremi Piotrowski wrote:
> On 07/12/2023 13:58, Huang, Kai wrote:
>>>
>>> That's how it currently works - all the enlightenments are in
>>> hypervisor/paravisor
>>> specific code in arch/x86/hyperv and drivers/hv and the vm is not marked
>>> with
>>> X86_FEATURE_TDX_GUEST.
>>
> >> The TDVMCALLs are related to the I/O path (networking/block io) into the L2
> guest, and
> >> so they intentionally go straight to L0 and are never injected to L1. L1
> >> is not
> >> involved in that path at all.
> >>
> >> Using something different than TDVMCALLs here would lead to additiona
On 07/12/2023 13:58, Huang, Kai wrote:
>>
>> That's how it currently works - all the enlightenments are in
>> hypervisor/paravisor
>> specific code in arch/x86/hyperv and drivers/hv and the vm is not marked with
>> X86_FEATURE_TDX_GUEST.
>
> And I believe there's a reason that the VM is not marke
On 06/12/2023 23:54, Kirill A. Shutemov wrote:
> On Wed, Dec 06, 2023 at 06:49:11PM +0100, Jeremi Piotrowski wrote:
>> On 05/12/2023 11:54, Kirill A. Shutemov wrote:
>>> On Mon, Dec 04, 2023 at 08:07:38PM +0100, Jeremi Piotrowski wrote:
On 04/12/2023 10:17, Reshetova, Elena wrote:
>> Check
On Wed, Dec 06, 2023 at 11:16:12PM +, justinst...@google.com wrote:
> This patch converts some basic cases of ethtool_sprintf() to
> ethtool_puts().
>
> The conversions are used in cases where ethtool_sprintf() was being used
> with just two arguments:
> | ethtool_sprintf(&data, buffer[i
On Wed, Dec 06, 2023 at 11:16:10PM +, justinst...@google.com wrote:
> Use strscpy() to implement ethtool_puts().
>
> Functionally the same as ethtool_sprintf() when it's used with two
> arguments or with just "%s" format specifier.
>
> Signed-off-by: Justin Stitt
Reviewed-by: Andrew Lunn
>
> > I think we are lacking background of this usage model and how it works. For
> > instance, typically L2 is created by L1, and L1 is responsible for L2's
> > device
> > I/O emulation. I don't quite understand how could L0 emulate L2's device
> > I/O?
> >
> > Can you provide more informat
On Tue, Dec 05, 2023 at 02:52:06PM -0800, Yury Norov wrote:
> On Tue, Dec 05, 2023 at 03:01:38AM -0800, Souradeep Chakrabarti wrote:
> > > > diff --git a/drivers/net/ethernet/microsoft/mana/gdma_main.c
> > > > b/drivers/net/ethernet/microsoft/mana/gdma_main.c
> > > > index 6367de0c2c2e..2194a53cce
11 matches
Mail list logo
