alternative for this. And similarly to the
struct_group_tagged()
change above, no struct members should be added before or after `struct
mlx5e_umr_wqe_hdr hdr;` in `struct mlx5e_umr_wqe`:
Thanks for your patch.
The change with the struct_group_tagged() uses advanced tag, and keeps
code cleaner.
I pref
~~
Switch the argument to unsigned int, which removes the compiler needing
to consider negative values.
Signed-off-by: Kees Cook
---
Cc: Tariq Toukan
Cc: Andrew Lunn
Cc: "David S. Miller"
Cc: Eric Dumazet
Cc: Jakub Kicinski
Cc: Paolo Abeni
Cc: Yishai Hadas
Cc: net...@vger.kernel.or
On 20/02/2025 3:46, Jakub Kicinski wrote:
On Wed, 19 Feb 2025 14:14:35 +0200 Tariq Toukan wrote:
On 18/02/2025 23:13, Jakub Kicinski wrote:
On Tue, 18 Feb 2025 17:53:14 +0200 Tariq Toukan wrote:
Maybe it wasn't clear enough.
We prefer the original patch, and provided the Reviewed-b
On 18/02/2025 17:37, Andrew Lunn wrote:
On Tue, Feb 18, 2025 at 11:49:14AM +0200, Tariq Toukan wrote:
On 18/02/2025 10:14, Gustavo A. R. Silva wrote:
Hi all,
Friendly ping: who can take this, please?
Thanks
--
Gustavo
net-next maintainers, please pick it.
I provided the Reviewed-by
On 18/02/2025 10:14, Gustavo A. R. Silva wrote:
Hi all,
Friendly ping: who can take this, please?
Thanks
--
Gustavo
net-next maintainers, please pick it.
I provided the Reviewed-by tag.
Tariq.
On 18/02/2025 23:13, Jakub Kicinski wrote:
On Tue, 18 Feb 2025 17:53:14 +0200 Tariq Toukan wrote:
Maybe it wasn't clear enough.
We prefer the original patch, and provided the Reviewed-by tag for it.
Can you explain what do you mean by "cleaner"?
I like the alternative much
