On Fri, Sep 13, 2024 at 5:01 PM Alice Ryhl wrote:
> +//! Utilities for working with ranges of indices.
> +
> +/// A range of indices.
> +///
> +/// This utility is useful for ensuring that no index in the range is used
> more than once.
> +#[derive(Debug)]
> +pub struct Range {
> +offset: us
On Sun, Sep 29, 2024 at 10:20:59PM +0200, Paul Moore wrote:
> On September 28, 2024 8:26:28 PM Nathan Chancellor wrote:
> > When running get_maintainer.pl on security/Kconfig.hardening, only the
> > security subsystem folks show up, even though they have never taken
> > patches to this file:
> >
On Sun, Sep 29, 2024 at 08:35:44AM -0700, Linus Torvalds wrote:
> On Sat, 28 Sept 2024 at 11:13, Nathan Chancellor wrote:
> >
> > MODVERSIONS recently grew a dependency on !COMPILE_TEST so that Rust
> > could be more easily tested. However, this introduces a Kconfig warning
> > when building allmo
On September 28, 2024 8:26:28 PM Nathan Chancellor wrote:
When running get_maintainer.pl on security/Kconfig.hardening, only the
security subsystem folks show up, even though they have never taken
patches to this file:
$ scripts/get_maintainer.pl security/Kconfig.hardening
Paul Moore <...> (s
On Sat, 28 Sept 2024 at 11:13, Nathan Chancellor wrote:
>
> MODVERSIONS recently grew a dependency on !COMPILE_TEST so that Rust
> could be more easily tested. However, this introduces a Kconfig warning
> when building allmodconfig with a clang version that supports RANDSTRUCT
> natively because R
when unload pstore_blk, we will unlink the pstore file and
set pos->dentry to NULL, but simple_unlink(d_inode(root), pos->dentry)
may free inode of pos->dentry and free pos by free_pstore_private,
this may trigger uaf. kasan report:
kernel: =
On Sun, Sep 29, 2024 at 08:43:37PM +0800, Li XingYang wrote:
I have another idea to fix this issue, which is to no longer use
pstore_put_mackend_records to release dentry, but instead to add the reference
count of the pstore backend driver when mounting pstore using try_rodule_get to
avoid unin
On 28/09/2024 23:51, Kees Cook wrote:
On Sat, Sep 28, 2024 at 02:46:36PM -0700, Andrew Morton wrote:
On Sat, 28 Sep 2024 14:39:45 -0700 Kees Cook wrote:
On Sat, Sep 28, 2024 at 02:35:32PM -0700, Andrew Morton wrote:
So why does __get_task_comm() need to take task_lock()?
That was to make
