On Thu, Jan 30, 2025 at 07:14:01AM +0100, Greg KH wrote:
> > Anyways, so far so good. For some reason I was under the impression
> > that you two guys wanted the container_first() macro.
>
> I don't :)
Greg, container_first() is like peeing in the shower. Once you try it
you'll never go back.
On Thu, Jan 30, 2025 at 10:06:00AM +1030, Gustavo A. R. Silva wrote:
>
>
> On 30/01/25 02:38, Greg KH wrote:
> > On Wed, Jan 29, 2025 at 05:06:54PM +0300, Dan Carpenter wrote:
> > > On Wed, Jan 29, 2025 at 02:14:14PM +0100, Greg KH wrote:
> > > > On Wed, Jan 29, 2025 at 01:39:27PM +0300, Dan Carp
On 30/01/25 02:38, Greg KH wrote:
On Wed, Jan 29, 2025 at 05:06:54PM +0300, Dan Carpenter wrote:
On Wed, Jan 29, 2025 at 02:14:14PM +0100, Greg KH wrote:
On Wed, Jan 29, 2025 at 01:39:27PM +0300, Dan Carpenter wrote:
On Wed, Jan 29, 2025 at 09:34:07AM +0100, Greg KH wrote:
On Wed, Jan 29,
On Wed, Jan 29, 2025 at 05:06:54PM +0300, Dan Carpenter wrote:
> On Wed, Jan 29, 2025 at 02:14:14PM +0100, Greg KH wrote:
> > On Wed, Jan 29, 2025 at 01:39:27PM +0300, Dan Carpenter wrote:
> > > On Wed, Jan 29, 2025 at 09:34:07AM +0100, Greg KH wrote:
> > > > On Wed, Jan 29, 2025 at 06:35:18PM +103
On Wed, Jan 29, 2025 at 02:14:14PM +0100, Greg KH wrote:
> On Wed, Jan 29, 2025 at 01:39:27PM +0300, Dan Carpenter wrote:
> > On Wed, Jan 29, 2025 at 09:34:07AM +0100, Greg KH wrote:
> > > On Wed, Jan 29, 2025 at 06:35:18PM +1030, Gustavo A. R. Silva wrote:
> > > >
> > > >
> > > > On 29/01/25 16:
On Wed, Jan 29, 2025 at 01:39:27PM +0300, Dan Carpenter wrote:
> On Wed, Jan 29, 2025 at 09:34:07AM +0100, Greg KH wrote:
> > On Wed, Jan 29, 2025 at 06:35:18PM +1030, Gustavo A. R. Silva wrote:
> > >
> > >
> > > On 29/01/25 16:24, Greg KH wrote:
> > > > On Wed, Jan 29, 2025 at 03:56:01PM +1030,
On Wed, Jan 29, 2025 at 09:34:07AM +0100, Greg KH wrote:
> On Wed, Jan 29, 2025 at 06:35:18PM +1030, Gustavo A. R. Silva wrote:
> >
> >
> > On 29/01/25 16:24, Greg KH wrote:
> > > On Wed, Jan 29, 2025 at 03:56:01PM +1030, Gustavo A. R. Silva wrote:
> > > > This is like container_of_const() but it
On Wed, Jan 29, 2025 at 06:35:18PM +1030, Gustavo A. R. Silva wrote:
>
>
> On 29/01/25 16:24, Greg KH wrote:
> > On Wed, Jan 29, 2025 at 03:56:01PM +1030, Gustavo A. R. Silva wrote:
> > > This is like container_of_const() but it contains an assert to
> > > ensure that it's using the first member
On 29/01/25 16:24, Greg KH wrote:
On Wed, Jan 29, 2025 at 03:56:01PM +1030, Gustavo A. R. Silva wrote:
This is like container_of_const() but it contains an assert to
ensure that it's using the first member in the structure.
But why? If you "know" it's the first member, just do a normal cas
On Wed, Jan 29, 2025 at 10:33:56AM +0300, Dan Carpenter wrote:
> On Wed, Jan 29, 2025 at 10:29:24AM +0300, Dan Carpenter wrote:
> > drivers/iommu/iommufd/iommufd_private.h
> >243 static inline struct iommufd_ioas *iommufd_get_ioas(struct
> > iommufd_ctx *ictx,
> >244
On Wed, Jan 29, 2025 at 10:29:24AM +0300, Dan Carpenter wrote:
> drivers/iommu/iommufd/iommufd_private.h
>243 static inline struct iommufd_ioas *iommufd_get_ioas(struct
> iommufd_ctx *ictx,
>244 u32 id)
>245 {
>246 ret
On Wed, Jan 29, 2025 at 06:54:48AM +0100, Greg KH wrote:
> On Wed, Jan 29, 2025 at 03:56:01PM +1030, Gustavo A. R. Silva wrote:
> > This is like container_of_const() but it contains an assert to
> > ensure that it's using the first member in the structure.
>
> But why? If you "know" it's the firs
On Wed, Jan 29, 2025 at 03:56:01PM +1030, Gustavo A. R. Silva wrote:
> This is like container_of_const() but it contains an assert to
> ensure that it's using the first member in the structure.
But why? If you "know" it's the first member, just do a normal cast.
If you don't, then you probably sh
13 matches
Mail list logo
