On Tue, Dec 17, 2024 at 12:30:36PM -0800, Kees Cook wrote:
> On Tue, Dec 17, 2024 at 10:35:44AM -0500, Willem de Bruijn wrote:
> > Kees Cook wrote:
> > > As part of trying to clean up struct sock_addr, add comments about the
> > > sockaddr arguments of dev_[gs]et_mac_address() being actual classic
On Tue, Dec 17, 2024 at 10:35:44AM -0500, Willem de Bruijn wrote:
> Kees Cook wrote:
> > As part of trying to clean up struct sock_addr, add comments about the
> > sockaddr arguments of dev_[gs]et_mac_address() being actual classic "max
> > 14 bytes in sa_data" sockaddr instances and not struct soc
Kees Cook wrote:
> As part of trying to clean up struct sock_addr, add comments about the
> sockaddr arguments of dev_[gs]et_mac_address() being actual classic "max
> 14 bytes in sa_data" sockaddr instances and not struct sockaddr_storage.
What is this assertion based on?
I see various non-Ethern
