On Sun, 2023-10-01 at 07:44:04 UTC, Christophe JAILLET wrote:
> Use struct_size() instead of hand writing it.
> This is less verbose and more robust.
>
> While at it, prepare for the coming implementation by GCC and Clang of the
> __counted_by attribute. Flexible array members annotated with __cou
Am Sonntag, 1. Oktober 2023, 09:44:04 CEST schrieb Christophe JAILLET:
> Use struct_size() instead of hand writing it.
> This is less verbose and more robust.
>
> While at it, prepare for the coming implementation by GCC and Clang of the
> __counted_by attribute. Flexible array members annotated w
On Sun, Oct 01, 2023 at 09:44:04AM +0200, Christophe JAILLET wrote:
> Use struct_size() instead of hand writing it.
> This is less verbose and more robust.
>
> While at it, prepare for the coming implementation by GCC and Clang of the
> __counted_by attribute. Flexible array members annotated with
On 10/1/23 09:44, Christophe JAILLET wrote:
Use struct_size() instead of hand writing it.
This is less verbose and more robust.
While at it, prepare for the coming implementation by GCC and Clang of the
__counted_by attribute. Flexible array members annotated with __counted_by
can have their
