[resend] I do not know why but below message got blocked for, I quote:
Your message looked spammy to us. Please check
https://subspace.kernel.org/etiquette.html and resend.
And I have no clue which part I violated. Maybe it is the gmail web
client? Resending with the git client, hoping this t
...
> > [1] Both the '+' and '*' have extra code to detect overflow and return
> > a 'big' value that will cause kmalloc() to return NULL.
> > I've not looked at the generated code but it is likely to be horrid
> > (especially the check for multiply overflowing).
> > In this case there are enou
From: Vincent Mailhol
> Sent: 10 September 2024 03:50
>
> If the offsetof() of a given flexible array member (fam) is smaller
> than the sizeof() of the containing struct, then the struct_size()
> macro reports a size which is too big.
>
> This occurs when the two conditions below are met:
>
>
On Wed. 11 Sep. 2024 at 09:36, Kees Cook wrote:
> On Tue, Sep 10, 2024 at 11:49:52AM +0900, Vincent Mailhol wrote:
> > If the offsetof() of a given flexible array member (fam) is smaller
> > than the sizeof() of the containing struct, then the struct_size()
> > macro reports a size which is too bi
On Tue, Sep 10, 2024 at 11:49:52AM +0900, Vincent Mailhol wrote:
> If the offsetof() of a given flexible array member (fam) is smaller
> than the sizeof() of the containing struct, then the struct_size()
> macro reports a size which is too big.
>
> This occurs when the two conditions below are met
