On Sat, Oct 07, 2023 at 12:38:28PM +0200, Lukas Loidolt wrote:
> On 07.10.23 06:12, Kees Cook wrote:
> > On Sat, Oct 07, 2023 at 12:30:01AM +0200, Lukas Loidolt wrote:
> > > In my tests, however, the performance version behaves more or less like
> > > the
> > > full version of randstruct.
> >
> >
On 07.10.23 06:12, Kees Cook wrote:
On Sat, Oct 07, 2023 at 12:30:01AM +0200, Lukas Loidolt wrote:
In my tests, however, the performance version behaves more or less like the
full version of randstruct.
Can you try this patch?
commit d73a3244700d3c945cedea7e1fb7042243c41e08
Author: Kees
On Sat, Oct 07, 2023 at 12:30:01AM +0200, Lukas Loidolt wrote:
> In my tests, however, the performance version behaves more or less like the
> full version of randstruct.
Can you try this patch?
commit d73a3244700d3c945cedea7e1fb7042243c41e08
Author: Kees Cook
AuthorDate: Fri Oct 6 21:09:28
On Sat, Oct 07, 2023 at 12:30:01AM +0200, Lukas Loidolt wrote:
> Hello!
>
> I have been looking into the implementation of the "randstruct" gcc-plugin
> and noticed a potential bug in its performance version, which is supposed to
> limit randomization to cache-line sized groupings of structure mem
Hello!
I have been looking into the implementation of the "randstruct"
gcc-plugin and noticed a potential bug in its performance version, which
is supposed to limit randomization to cache-line sized groupings of
structure members.
I haven't been able to find too much documentation on this vers
