On Tue, Jun 11, 2024 at 11:26:25PM -0700, srinivas pandruvada wrote:
> On Sat, 2024-06-08 at 11:56 +0200, Erick Archer wrote:
> > Hi Srinivas,
> > First of all, thanks for looking at this ;)
> >
> > On Sat, Jun 08, 2024 at 01:42:54AM -0700, srinivas pandruvada wrote:
> > > On Sun, 2024-05-26 at 15
On Sat, 2024-06-08 at 11:56 +0200, Erick Archer wrote:
> Hi Srinivas,
> First of all, thanks for looking at this ;)
>
> On Sat, Jun 08, 2024 at 01:42:54AM -0700, srinivas pandruvada wrote:
> > On Sun, 2024-05-26 at 15:32 +0200, Erick Archer wrote:
> > > One-element arrays as fake flex arrays are d
Hi Srinivas,
First of all, thanks for looking at this ;)
On Sat, Jun 08, 2024 at 01:42:54AM -0700, srinivas pandruvada wrote:
> On Sun, 2024-05-26 at 15:32 +0200, Erick Archer wrote:
> > One-element arrays as fake flex arrays are deprecated [1] and we are
> > moving towards adopting C99 flexible-a
On Sun, 2024-05-26 at 15:32 +0200, Erick Archer wrote:
> One-element arrays as fake flex arrays are deprecated [1] and we are
> moving towards adopting C99 flexible-array members, instead. This
> case
> also has more complexity because it is a flexible array of flexible
> arrays and this patch need
One-element arrays as fake flex arrays are deprecated [1] and we are
moving towards adopting C99 flexible-array members, instead. This case
also has more complexity because it is a flexible array of flexible
arrays and this patch needs to be ready to enable the new compiler flag
-Wflex-array-member
